| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
原始链接: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44056407
Hacker News上的一篇帖子讨论了E.M. 福斯特的《机器停止运转》及其预见性,许多人认为它影响了皮克斯的《机器人瓦力》等作品。评论者赞赏了故事对人类对技术的依赖和社会衰败的探讨。 一位用户提出了一种基于技术水平的分层社会结构,以增强应对灾难的韧性。这个想法引发了进一步的讨论,提到了格雷格·伊根的《Diaspora》和约翰·迈克尔·格里尔的《Retrotopia》中的类似概念。 谈话涉及到《沙丘》中没有电脑的世界和预言家的作用。一些人认为故事的主题越来越贴近现实,尤其是在失去与物理世界的联系以及技术可能使个人孤立方面。一些人提到了BBC对该故事的改编。最终,这篇帖子突出了《机器停止运转》作为对文明、技术和人性的评论的持久力量。
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
I wonder if humanity could/should have its cake and eat it to. Imagine a world where different communities intentionally live at different technology levels. At the lowest level, you don't have electricity, just man- and animal-power. At the mid-level, you have steam engines and electricity, but no computers. At the high-level you have everything. Ideally one could choose which level to live at, perhaps at the coming-of-age. The nice thing about such a civilization is that it's resiliant to damage - for example, a Carrington event (e.g. massive solar flare) might destroy the high-level civ, damage the medium-level civ, but leave the low-level civ untouched. There might even be instructions/commitment/duty for civs to rebuild each other after disaster. (I believe we badly overestimate our ability to "drop down" a tech level in an emergency; such lifestyles must be maintained by practice.)
reply