燃烧的毛
Burning Mao

原始链接: https://granta.com/burning-mao/

1977年夏天,一个16岁的女孩,痴迷于安迪·沃霍尔和写作,开始在他位于纽约的工厂工作。她从小就从母亲那里听说了沃霍尔古怪世界的各种故事,终于在一家高级餐厅见到了他。起初她非常紧张,但发现沃霍尔出奇地平易近人,很容易交谈。然而,沃霍尔似乎更感兴趣的是她对《访谈》杂志的潜在贡献,这导致了两人之间略显尴尬的交流。尽管这次相遇看似光鲜亮丽,但她感到沮丧和格格不入。 沃霍尔自己的日记证实了这次会面,并重点提到了她承认之前曾尾随工厂的行为。作者反思了与沃霍尔之间共同的孤独感和疏离感,一种渴望置身事外、旁观一切的愿望。这种宁愿远观而不愿完全参与的冲动深深地触动了她,尽管她有着优越的背景。这种共同的孤独感,这种更倾向于观察而非归属的偏好,正是他们之间联系显得真实可信的原因。

Hacker News上的一篇帖子讨论了关于安迪·沃霍尔毛泽东肖像的文章“燃烧的毛泽东”。一些评论者纠结于展示毛泽东肖像的伦理问题,将其与希特勒和斯大林作比较,因为毛泽东应对数百万人的死亡负责。一些人认为,在中国,毛泽东因统一国家、结束外国压迫而受到好评,而另一些人则强调其政策造成的灾难性后果,特别是大跃进。关于这场饥荒是否是蓄意的以及它是否等同于谋杀存在争议。讨论涉及到西方帝国主义在中国历史上扮演的角色,以及用现代标准评判历史人物的复杂性。一些人认为毛泽东肖像可以被解读为具有讽刺意味的或纯粹的艺术品,而另一些人则强烈反对任何对这位导致大量苦难的领导人的正常化。这篇帖子探讨了艺术表达、历史背景和道德责任之间的界限。

原文

The summer of 1977, when I was sixteen years old, I started work at Andy Warhol’s Factory.

I was a teen stalker, a fantasist who mostly preferred sitting on a stoop opposite someone’s house, noting the street-scene in my diary, to actually meeting the person inside, and Andy had long been one of my simmering obsessions.

My parents – New York society people with an interest in downtown art – had first met Andy in the late fifties, when my father was working as a fashion photographer and Andy was still an illustrator dressing windows for Bonwit Teller. My father liked to say that back then he’d thought Andy Warhol an embarrassing little creep whose determination to be famous was clearly doomed. But my mother had a taste for oddball dreamers and she and Andy became friends; she appeared in one of his 1964 Screen Tests. I’d been raised on her stories of the Factory – the silver-tinfoil-walled spaceship where Andy, pedaling on his exercise bike, swigged codeine-infused cough syrup and watched his superstars squabble and self-destruct. Watched and subtly egged them on. At a certain point, my mother got spooked by how many of his beautiful, lost young creatures ended up dead.

In 1968, Andy was shot by Valerie Solanas and he too, briefly, died. It was a time when America’s chickens, in Malcolm X’s phrase, seemed to be coming home to roost – Andy’s shooting was edged off the front pages by Robert F. Kennedy’s two days later – and when Andy came back from the dead, with his insides shattered and sewn together again, he was seemingly cured of his taste for watching other people detonate.

On 7 December 1976, I finally succeeded in pestering my parents into introducing me to Andy Warhol.

By then, they had devolved into merely social, semi-professional friends who exchanged poinsettia plants at Christmas, and the Andy I had wanted to know – the ghostly cyclist who could mesmerize you for eight hours with a flickery image of a skyscraper – had been supplanted by the art-businessman flanked by pinstripe-suited managers. And I too was in a different phase. By the time I actually made it to the Factory, I was less interested in Andy than in dancing at Studio 54 with his managers.

Our first meeting was at La Grenouille, a fancy French restaurant in Midtown. My parents had invited Andy to dinner, and later that night, I wrote my first impression of him in my diary. Andy was ‘standing there in his dinner jacket and blue jeans, tape recorder tucked under his arm, looking shy and uncertain but friendly’. He had brought as his date Bianca Jagger, gorgeous in a purple fox stole and a gold lamé toque. They ordered oysters and a spinach soufflé, which she sent back because, as she explained to the waiter, it was affreux. ‘Halfway through dinner Mummy asked me to switch places with her so I could talk to Andy. Andy said something about my mother being “mean” not to let me sit next to him before. So we talked the rest of the evening. I was a little shy and ended up feeling oddly depressed and dispirited, sort of drained. He said I looked like a movie star, had I ever thought of being one. That seemed like the sort of thing he says to about five hundred people a week . . . He asked me to bring down my whole class to the studio – that too I found depressing. I asked “Why don’t you come to Brearley [the private girls’ school where I was in eleventh grade]?” He said no, he could never do that, something about being too shy. I said, “Well, a lot of them are really awful.” He said, “Well, bring the awful ones too.” He’s very easy to talk to, I kept saying things I wished I hadn’t.’

My mother had told Andy I was a writer and he asked if there was anyone I wanted to write about for his magazine Interview.

He said they needed something for the January issue. ‘“We want someone young and really new – what have you seen on Broadway, who can you think of” on and on, I was completely stuck. Ludicrously I suggested Mr [Edward] Gorey. Andy said, “Oh come on. He’s creepy – he’s really old. I saw him walking along Park Avenue the other day. He’s too peculiar for me.” That made me laugh. “Too peculiar for you? He’s just a bit moldy. I was obsessed with him for about two years.” Mr Gorey’s star was pretty dim that night.’

I suggested other writers, photographers, film-makers whose work I admired. All too old, too peculiar. Finally, I proposed the choreographer Andy de Groat, who had just collaborated on Philip Glass and Robert Wilson’s Einstein on the Beach.

Andy agreed, ‘though he thought Einstein on the Beach was “stinky”. He wanted some more people. I told him I’d provide some later. Andy said to call A de G tomorrow, and then him. “The piece has to be in really soon.”

Andy’s description of the evening, published in his Diaries, accords with mine, but he added a nice coda. ‘The Eberstadt daughter didn’t say anything during dinner but then she finally blurted out that she used to go to Union Square and stare up at the Factory, so that was thrilling to hear from this beautiful girl. I told her she should come down and do interviews for Interview and she said, “Good! I need the money.” Isn’t that a great line? I mean, here Freddy’s father died and left him a whole stock brokerage company.’

As a kid, I used to feel this need to be outside in the dark, looking up at lighted windows, imagining the life inside. I still do. But nowadays the lighted window is my own, my husband and children are inside, but something broken and uncured keeps me outside, sniffing the night wind and rain, unable to join the circle by the fire.

The Andy I was drawn to was dogged by this same self-imposed and unassuageable loneliness, though his version of the family fire was the VIP lounge at Studio 54 with Truman Capote, Halston and Liza Minnelli. Yet no matter how famous he became, he was still the ‘embarrassing little creep’ who, when he first arrived in New York, had harassed Truman Capote with daily fan letters, phone calls, and camped out on his doorstep; he was still the balding twenty-something sitting every day at the counter of Chock full o’Nuts, eating the same cream-cheese sandwich on date-nut bread; someone who founded his art on boredom, repetition, because only unvarying sameness could soothe his raging anxiety.

I told Andy the first time we met that this was something we had in common – that although, as he put it in his Diaries, I was a ‘beautiful girl’, a banker’s granddaughter, I was also a freak like him, a person who in some way would rather stand outside staring up at the Factory windows than be invited in.

Even today, it’s this same dividedness in Andy that gives me a pang of fellow feeling, the same compulsion to hide away that
overrules your hunger to belong, a compulsion that then leaves you feeling too lonely, too weird, too left out of everyone else’s fun. And why does the loneliness feel truer, more essential than any love or acclaim?

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com