海洋铁施肥
Ocean Iron Fertilization

原始链接: https://www.whoi.edu/know-your-ocean/ocean-topics/climate-weather/ocean-based-climate-solutions/iron-fertilization/

20世纪90年代和2000年代早期的实验表明,向海洋施加铁肥可以促进浮游植物的繁殖,特别是硅藻。这些较大的藻类能有效捕获二氧化碳,并且由于它们的硅质外壳,在死亡后很容易下沉,潜在地将碳封存在深海中。 尽管结果令人鼓舞,但仍存在一些担忧。虽然确实发生了藻华现象,但碳下沉情况并非总是能够被追踪到。此外,铁的浓度是否过高也尚不清楚。硅藻会产生毒素,铁肥可能会扰乱海洋养分循环。需要更多研究来了解这些潜在的影响,并在广泛实施之前量化碳封存量。 尽管过去存在抵制,但科学家们正在重新审视铁肥作为一种具有成本效益的二氧化碳去除策略。改进的技术允许对碳流进行全面的监测。然而,必须记住,铁肥的探索应该透明进行,并且不能否定减少化石燃料排放的紧迫需要。

Hacker News上的一篇讨论帖谈论了海洋铁施肥作为一种潜在的碳捕获解决方案,并引用了WHOI的一篇文章。一位名为Mistletoe的用户表达了兴奋之情,但也对潜在的负面后果表示担忧。Ryandamm承认对未知风险的担忧是合理的,但他认为持续的气候变化造成的潜在危害可能超过这些风险。他们强调了海洋铁施肥相比其他方法(如增强风化作用,需要搬运大量的岩石)的可扩展性。Ryandamm认为这种散布微量矿物质的方法可能在去除大气中大量二氧化碳(以应对气候变化所需)方面具有很高的杠杆作用,并最终支持进一步研究这种方法。

原文

In the 1990s and early 2000s, a series of experiments tested iron fertilization in the open ocean. These tests consistently found that adding iron led to phytoplankton blooms, However, the extent to which that carbon sank to the depths wasn’t always measured, and the phytoplankton were not able to use all of the iron for growth before the mineral sank.

Researchers did document changes in phytoplankton communities, with diatoms becoming more abundant than many other types of phytoplankton. These algae can be up to 1,000 times larger than cyanobacteria, allowing them to take up more carbon dioxide via photosynthesis. Diatoms create silica-based glass-like shells that add weight, increasing the likelihood that they will sink faster than other, smaller phytoplankton when they die. Their fast growth rates and loss to the deep sea bodes well for potential removal of carbon from the atmosphere and its sequestration deeper in the ocean.

Some diatoms, however, release toxins that can contribute to harmful algal blooms, although these did not occur following any of the field experiments. In addition, iron fertilization has the potential to alter where and how nutrients are allocated in the marine ecosystem. Until experiments are done to test these potential outcomes and determine how much carbon can be sequestered in the ocean depths, iron fertilization should not be put to use as a method of slowing climate change.

Early iron fertilization experiments faced resistance, due to the many unknowns. Despite this, scientists are returning to the idea as one CDR tool that should be on the table in the fight against climate change. They are currently working to create codes of conduct, so that research can be conducted in a transparent manner to better understand both intended and unintended consequences of adding iron to the ocean’s surface.

New technologies using autonomous platforms and sensors now exist that allow scientists to fully investigate the potential for iron to remove atmospheric carbon and track the subsequent movement of that carbon through the ocean. Because iron fertilization would be relatively inexpensive, it could be an important part of a suite of CDR activities aimed at removing excessive amounts of carbon dioxide from our atmosphere. But it’s important to remember that such approaches do not replace the need for immediate and major reductions in the use of fossil fuels that produce carbon dioxide in the first place.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com