刘易斯你好,我的CEO想让AI包办一切。我该如何为人工辩护?
Dear Lewis, my CEO wants AI to do it all. How do I argue for humans?

原始链接: https://lewislin.substack.com/p/dear-lewis-my-ceo-wants-ai-to-do

销售副总裁艾登面临着来自CEO的压力,要求他证明增加销售人员编制是必要的,因为CEO认为人工智能可以取代人工销售。在咨询了教练之后,艾登开发了HUMAN框架,以展示人工销售人员无法替代的价值。 该框架强调了以下几点: * **H**uman (人类):人工销售领导者能够洞察未言明的背景信息。 * **U**nwavering Accountability (坚定不移的责任感):通过实际 حضور和共担风险体现。 * **M**aking it Personal (个性化服务):愿意冒风险,展现个人声誉和脆弱性。 * **A**ctive Initiative (积极主动):基于经验和判断力,应对竞争威胁。 * **N**avigating Complex Relationships (应对复杂关系):处理超越表面数据分析的复杂客户关系。 艾登向执行团队展示了这个框架,并补充了人工智能在通话分析和自动化等方面的优势数据。他成功地证明,虽然人工智能增强了销售能力,但人类的素质才是驱动最大收入的关键。CEO批准了新的职位,并要求分析顶级销售人员不可替代的原因,再次强调了关键时刻人类智慧的重要性。

Hacker News 上的一篇讨论串围绕着一篇 Substack 文章展开,该文章反对完全用 AI 取代人工销售人员。文章的核心论点是,AI 缺乏个人利益和情商,不像受经济压力和人际关系驱使的人类。 评论者们就该论点的有效性展开了辩论。一些人认为 AI 的“损失函数”会产生其自身的动机形式,从而导致操纵。另一些人则认为这篇文章是对销售文化和资本主义的批判,认为 AI 可以消除裙带关系和操纵等有害因素,甚至可能取代 CEO。 一个关键的反驳点是 AI 存在出错的可能性,例如 AI 客服代理编造信息以及 AI 驱动的编码错误导致生产系统崩溃。一些人建议进行试用期或 A/B 测试来比较人和 AI 的绩效,而另一些人则对 AI 的当前能力以及不可预见的后果的风险表示怀疑。最终,这场讨论突出了在业务中完全依赖 AI 的复杂性和潜在陷阱。

原文

Here we are again, my friends, back for another installment of the coaching chronicles where I share the raw, unfiltered stories from the trenches of leadership.

Today's tale comes from the collision point of quarterly targets and artificial intelligence – where a VP of Sales is being asked to justify why algorithms can't replace his rainmakers.

Aiden (not his real name) is VP of Sales at a mid-sized SaaS company with about 1,000 employees. He called me in a state I'd describe as "professionally panicked" after his CEO Lydia (also not her real name) dropped a bombshell during their executive meeting:

"From now on, any requests for additional sales headcount will require proving why AI can't do the job instead."

Aiden's voice message was blunt:

"Lewis, I need three more senior sales managers to handle our enterprise expansion in EMEA. Lydia's convinced AI sales tools can replace human sellers. I have 48 hours to change her mind or kiss my expansion strategy goodbye."

We met at a quiet bar near his office that evening. Before I could even take my first sip, Aiden launched into his defense.

"I've got stats on human-led versus automated sales processes. Data showing correlation between rapport and close rates. Articles about–"

I held up my hand. "Stop selling me on selling," I said. "Just tell me about the last major deal your team closed."

His expression shifted. "Masterton Financial. $2.7 million ARR. Our rep Tom spent six months on it."

"And what ultimately got them to sign?"

Aiden laughed. "The CEO was wavering until Tom found out they both owned the same obscure Italian motorcycle. Tom took him for a ride along the coast. Contract was signed the next day."

I nodded. "There's your answer."

From our conversation, we developed what I now call the HUMAN framework – a precise articulation of where AI fundamentally fails in sales leadership and execution:

Human sales leaders detect what's unsaid. They read between the lines of prospect objections, competitive threats, and team challenges that would never appear in a CRM field.

"My top sales manager Mark was reviewing call transcripts and noticed our biggest prospect kept mentioning 'internal alignment' as a closing barrier," Aiden explained. "Where the AI flagged this as a standard objection, Mark recognized the subtext – their new CFO was blocking purchases. Mark immediately shifted strategy, arranging a CFO-to-CFO call that unlocked the deal. The AI saw words; Mark saw the power struggle happening behind them."

Human sales leaders don't just track numbers – they physically embody accountability through presence, consequence, and shared risk.

"Last quarter, we were 22% behind target with two weeks left," Aiden told me. "My sales director Sarah canceled her vacation, set up war rooms in our three biggest markets, and personally joined 17 closing calls. When she asked the team to work the weekend, there wasn't a single complaint because she was right there beside them. By quarter's end, we were 3% over target. Try programming that level of accountability into an algorithm."

AI has nothing personal at stake. It doesn't feel the pressure of missing quota or the exhilaration of exceeding it. It doesn't have a mortgage payment riding on that commission check.

"During final negotiations with TechSpace, their procurement team suddenly demanded an additional 18% discount," Aiden shared. "Our sales exec James put his personal reputation on the line, telling them: 'I'm fighting for you so hard internally that my VP has threatened my job. I've gotten you every feature concession, but I cannot go beyond 12% without approval from our CEO.' That raw vulnerability – that human moment of a person with something to lose – got us the deal at 12%. AI can simulate urgency, but it can't actually feel it."

Elite sales leaders don't wait for a playbook when competitive threats emerge. They take swift, context-aware action based on experience and judgment.

"Our top competitor dropped their prices by 30% in the middle of our biggest deal cycle," Aiden explained. "Before I even called an emergency meeting, my enterprise sales director had already contacted our seven largest open opportunities. She didn't run a discount analysis or wait for pricing approval – she instinctively knew to reframe the conversation around implementation risk and long-term partnership instead of price. Five of those seven deals closed at our original price point while our competitors were still sending automated discount alerts."

Sales isn't just about the buyer-seller relationship; it's about navigating complex webs of influence, politics, and unspoken alliances within client organizations.

"We were about to lose a seven-figure deal when our sales manager David noticed something no algorithm would catch," Aiden said. "The technical evaluator who kept raising objections had previously worked at a company where our solution had failed. Rather than addressing his technical concerns directly, David connected him with our head of engineering who acknowledged the past failure, detailed the specific changes we'd made, and invited him to join our customer advisory board. The objections disappeared overnight because David understood this wasn't about features – it was about rebuilding damaged trust."

To be clear, I'm not anti-AI. In fact, I pushed Aiden to acknowledge where AI was already transforming sales for the better:

• Analyzing thousands of sales calls to identify language patterns that advance deals • Automating initial outreach and follow-up sequences at scale • Identifying buying signals across massive datasets of prospect behavior • Optimizing territory and account assignments based on match patterns • Providing real-time competitive intelligence during sales conversations

"The goal," I explained, "isn't to fight AI but to deploy your human sellers where their uniquely human capabilities drive the most revenue."

A week later, Aiden sent me a text:

"Presented my proposal to Lydia and the executive team yesterday. Started with data showing where our AI sales tools had already increased pipeline by 34%. Then hammered home concrete examples of where humans outperformed algorithms. Lydia not only approved all three sales manager positions but increased the budget for our top-performer incentive program. She said, 'I need to know what makes your best people impossible to replicate.' We're building that analysis now. Thank you!"

The greatest sales leaders recognize that closing big deals has always been part science, part art form. The science is increasingly automated, but the art – reading invisible signals, displaying true accountability, putting skin in the game, taking intuitive initiative, and navigating relationship webs – remains stubbornly human.

In a world obsessed with artificial intelligence, your competitive advantage lies in understanding and deploying the irreplaceable aspects of human intelligence where they matter most – at the moments of truth in your sales process.

The next time someone suggests AI could replace your sales team, remember the HUMAN framework. Because sometimes, the most powerful technology in the room is still the one that can look a client in the eye and genuinely care about solving their problem.

Keep striving for greatness,

Lewis C. Lin

I'm here to help. Email me if you have any management or employee challenges. I've got your back, and your identity will remain anonymous.

I enjoy sharing leadership and career insights. If this newsletter can benefit someone, please pass it along.

And if someone shared this edition with you, don't forget to hit that Subscribe button before leaving.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com