美国功能失调的上层阶级
America's Dysfunctional Overclass

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/americas-dysfunctional-overclass

据政治评论家迈克尔·巴罗内撰写的《大纪元时报》报道,美国上层阶级对普通民众抱有强烈的偏见。 一项针对精英人士(包括持有高级学位、年收入超过 15 万美元或毕业于名牌大学的人士)进行的调查显示,绝大多数人认为,普通美国人过着自我放纵的生活方式,过度消耗资源,破坏了环境。 该阶层主张采取严格措施控制温室气体排放,这可能会导致空调或航空旅行等日常用品受到限制。 传统上,政客自称代表寻求舒适、安全生活的“小人物”,但这一新兴趋势突显了统治精英现在如何将普通美国人视为贪婪和不负责任的人。 结果,当以一党为主的精英与普通公民存在巨大分歧时,就会出现不稳定和不安全的情况。 相反,杰米·戴蒙(Jamie Dimon)等商界领袖认识到硅谷以外城市中心以外正在发生的积极经济增长,并鼓励相互尊重他人。 巴拉克·奥巴马(Barack Obama)表示,“这不是你建造的”,民主党人越来越蔑视普通民众,同时提倡紧缩政策,而不是促进合作与协作。 这种立场对社会凝聚力构成了令人不安的威胁,因为它暗示着贵族文化的回归,让人想起革命前的法国时代,或者晚期俄罗斯帝国在各自革命之前的超然和冷漠态度。

相关文章

原文

Authored by Michael Barone via The Epoch Times,

What does America’s overclass think of the rest of us? The short answer is “not much.”

They think ordinary people’s splurging on natural resources is destroying the planet and needs to be cut back forcefully.

And that the government needs to stamp down on ordinary people enjoying luxuries that, in their view, should be reserved for the top elites.

These are the implications of the results of two surveys of elite people conducted by pollster Scott Rasmussen by the Committee to Unleash Prosperity, an organization that supports low tax rates and low government spending. The surveys covered not large swaths of the population but were confined to the top 1 percent of society.

One survey, the Elite, included only respondents with postgraduate degrees, household incomes above $150,000 and residents in a ZIP code with more than 10,000 people per square mile. Another, Ivy League graduates, included adults who attended Ivy League or other selective private colleges such as Chicago, Duke, Northwestern, or Stanford.

You probably won’t be surprised that the large majority of this Elite feels economically well off. Nor, if you’ve kept up with recent changes in party identification, will you be much surprised that 73 percent of these elites identify as Democrats and only 14 percent as Republicans.

What is surprising is the extent to which this American overclass would deprive its fellow citizens of things they have taken for granted. Half of these groups, 47 percent of Elites and 55 percent of Ivies, say the United States provides people with “too much individual freedom.”

More than three-quarters favor, “to fight climate change, the strict rationing of energy, gas, and meat,” a proposition rejected by 63 percent of the public. Again, “to fight climate change,” between half and two-thirds favor bans on gas stoves (a recent target despite demurrals of Biden bureaucrats and New York state Democrats), gasoline-powered cars (heavily disfavored by Biden Democrats and California rules) and SUVs, “private” air conditioning, and “nonessential air travel.”

The ascetic economist Thorstein Veblen, in his 1899 book “The Theory of the Leisure Class,” argued that the rich engaged in “conspicuous consumption” activities such as golf, polo, and art collecting, for which ordinary people had neither the time nor the money.

A century and a quarter later, America has rich people hoping to deprive ordinary people of “conspicuous consumption” activities they can afford and where they clutter up the airports, interstate highways, and high-end malls.

For generations, Democrats have liked to portray themselves as the tribune of the little man, the defender of policies that enable ordinary people without special advantages, or with many disadvantages, to live comfortably, securely, and in dignity. There may be some condescension in this posture, but also a considerable element of respect.

This survey shows that today, this 1 percent of the public, which includes virtually all elective and appointive Democrats in Washington and states like California, New York, and New Jersey, tends to see the bulk of its fellow citizens as selfish and destructive, in need not just of discipline but deserving of harsh restrictions on their freedoms.

This attitude is echoed by the wider group of Democratic voters. A 2023 Pew Research survey shows that while 31 percent of Republicans, even with their party out of power, think America “stands above all other countries in the world,” only 9 percent of Democrats do so.

It’s an unstable and dangerous situation when a largely one-party elite looks, with fear and loathing, across what Rasmussen describes as a “Grand Canyon gap” between it and its multiparty fellow citizens. It’s reminiscent somehow of the “let them eat cake” French royalists in 1789 or Russian nobles in 1917. An overclass this disconnected and contemptuous risks disruption.

A better approach comes from an undoubted member of America’s elite, JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon. Speaking to CNBC at Davos last month, Dimon recounted a bus trip to Spokane and Boise and Bozeman: “People are growing. They’re hungry to grow. They’re innovating. It’s everywhere. It’s not just Silicon Valley.”

Perhaps aware the Mountain West votes Republican, Dimon, who calls himself a centrist Democrat, conceded that former President Donald Trump “wasn’t wrong about some of the critical issues” and was “kind of right” about NATO and immigration and “grew the economy quite well.”

Of elite Democrats’ contempt for Trump supporters, he had less to say.

“The Democrats have done a good job with the deplorables, hugging their Bibles and their beer and their guns. I mean, really? Can we stop that stuff and actually grow up and treat other people respectfully and listen to them a little bit?”

It’s a question other members of our dysfunctional overclass might ask themselves.

*  *  *

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times or ZeroHedge.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com