私募股权公司过去十年收购了500多家自闭症中心:研究显示。
Private equity firms acquired more than 500 autism centers in past decade: study

原始链接: https://www.brown.edu/news/2026-01-07/private-equity-autism-centers

一项来自布朗大学的新研究显示,全美自闭症治疗中心中的私募股权投资大幅增加。过去十年里,各公司已收购42个州的574家中心,其中近80%的收购发生在2018年至2022年间。 研究人员发现,投资集中在自闭症患病率较高且保险覆盖范围较宽松的州。私募股权的快速涌入引发了人们对利润优先于患者护理的担忧,可能导致治疗强度增加(且可能不必要),并给州医疗补助预算带来压力。 该研究强调了这些收购缺乏透明度,因为私募股权公司没有义务公开披露收购信息。研究人员目前正在寻求资金,以调查私募股权所有权对治疗效果、护理可及性和自闭症儿童服务整体质量的影响。目标是确定这项投资是否真正改善了护理,还是主要由财务收益驱动。

最近一项被Hacker News 强调的研究显示,过去十年里,私募股权公司收购了超过500家自闭症中心。 这一收购趋势引发了评论员的担忧,他们担心利润会优先于患者护理——这种模式已经在私有股权拥有的医院和疗养院中出现。 用户指出治疗师的薪水(25-30美元/小时)与服务费用(80美元/次以上)之间存在显著差异,表明利润率很高。 虽然一些人承认需要监管,以及像B Corp认证等模式可能带来的好处,例如在董事会中增加患者/医生代表,但另一些人对此表示怀疑,并提到了游说和监管俘获。 许多人对从弱势群体中获利表示沮丧,而另一些人则认为医疗保健*可以*既有利可图又富有同情心。 普遍的观点是,私募股权利用监管漏洞,有效的监督对于防止护理质量进一步恶化至关重要。
相关文章

原文

PROVIDENCE, R.I. [Brown University] — Private equity firms acquired more than 500 autism therapy centers across the U.S. over the past decade, with nearly 80% of acquisitions occurring over a four-year span.

That’s according to a new study from researchers at Brown University’s Center for Advancing Health Policy through Research.

Study author Yashaswini Singh, a health economist at Brown’s School of Public Health, said the work highlights how financial firms are rapidly moving into a sensitive area of health care with little public scrutiny or data on where this is happening or why.

“The big takeaway is that there is yet another segment of health care that has emerged as potentially profitable to private equity investors, and it is very distinct from where we have traditionally known investors to go, so the potential for harm can be a lot more serious,” Singh said. “We're also dealing with children who are largely insured by Medicaid programs, so if private equity increases the intensity of care, what we're looking at are impacts to state Medicaid budgets down the road.”

The findings were published in JAMA Pediatrics and offer one of the first national assessments of private equity’s growing role in autism therapies and services. Autism diagnoses among U.S. children have risen sharply in recent years, nearly tripling between 2011 and 2022, and autism has been in the national spotlight amid political debate claiming links between autism and childhood vaccines.

The findings suggest that investment has been concentrated in states with higher rates of autism diagnoses among children and states that have fewer limits on insurance coverage.

The researchers identified a total of 574 autism therapy centers owned by private equity firms as of 2024, spanning 42 states. Most of those centers were acquired between 2018 and 2022, the result of 142 separate deals. The largest concentrations of centers were in California (97), Texas (81), Colorado (38), Illinois (36) and Florida (36). Sixteen states had one or no private equity-owned clinics at the end of 2024.

States in the top third for childhood autism prevalence were 24% more likely to have private equity–owned clinics than others, according to the study.

The scale and speed of acquisitions underscore the growing trend of private equity’s entry into the market, the researchers say. According to Singh, the team was prompted to investigate that trend after hearing anecdotal reports from families and health providers about changes following private equity takeovers.

The primary concern is that private equity firms may prioritize financial gains over families, said Daniel Arnold, a senior research scientist at the School of Public Health.

“It's all about the financial incentives,” Arnold said. “I worry about the same types of revenue-generating strategies seen in other private equity-backed settings. I worry about children receiving more than the clinically appropriate amount of services and worsening disparities in terms of which children have access to services.”

To establish a baseline of where private equity firms are investing and why, the team used a mix of proprietary databases, public press releases and manual verification of archived websites to track changes in ownership. Unlike public companies, private equity firms and private practices are not required to disclose acquisitions, making data collection challenging and labor-intensive.

The team is now seeking federal funding to examine how private equity ownership affects outcomes, including changes in therapy intensity, medication use, diagnosis age or how long children stay in treatment. They seek to determine whether these investments are helping to meet real needs or are primarily a way to make money.

“Private investors making a little bit of money while expanding access is not a bad thing, per se,” Singh said. “But we need to understand how much of a bad thing this is and how much of a good thing this is. This is a first step in that direction.”

This study received funding from the National Institute on Aging (R01AG073286) and the National Institute on Mental Health (R01MH132128).

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com