法院允许政府保留在车库下埋藏的100万美元,即使居民已被判无罪。
Court Lets Government Keep $1 Million Found Buried Under Garage... Even After The Resident Was Acquitted

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/court-lets-government-keep-1-million-found-buried-under-garage-even-after-resident-was

2009年,安大略省警方在农村一处住宅搜寻手枪时,在一个Rubbermaid塑料盒中发现了超过120万加元的现金,以及在其他地方发现的少量现金。尽管租户马塞尔·布雷顿因搜查令存在缺陷而被判无罪,但他被指控拥有犯罪所得,但检察官成功辩称这笔钱并非他合法所得。 安大略省上诉法院最近维持了一项裁决,允许政府保留大部分现金,理由是其数量巨大、包装仔细,并且与毒品交易金额——特别是2009年的可卡因价格——相符。布雷顿声称他的生意是现金维修业务,并且可能中奖,但这些说法被认为是不可信的解释。 值得注意的是,此案是通过刑事法院而非民事没收进行的。专家认为,存在一种预设观念,即大量隐藏的现金与犯罪活动有关,而且政府不愿归还无人认领的资金。只有在通风口发现的一小部分现金,1.5万加元,被判决归还给布雷顿。

相关文章

原文

In 2009, Thunder Bay police searched a rural Ontario home for an illegal .22-caliber handgun. They didn’t find the gun, but they did uncover cash hidden throughout the property: C$15,000 stuffed into a floor vent, C$9,750 tucked in a garage suitcase, and about C$1.2 million sealed in a Rubbermaid tub buried beneath the garage floor, according to the New York Times.

The tenant, Marcel Breton, was charged with possessing proceeds of crime, but he successfully challenged the search warrant and was acquitted. That left the courts to decide whether the money should be returned or forfeited—never a tough call for a government that treats unclaimed cash like its natural habitat.

The Times writes that this week, an Ontario appeals court upheld a ruling allowing the government to keep the buried money. Though Breton wasn’t convicted, prosecutors persuaded the court the cash wasn’t lawfully his. The judges emphasized the sheer scale and packaging of the money. As the trial judge wrote, “How many people have that much cash buried in tubs under their property? How many average people have that much money in their bank accounts at any given time? Not a lot in my experience.”

They also agreed with expert evidence that the bundles were “consistent with the cash being proceeds of crime,” and noted that the dominance of $20 bills and the presence of two bricks containing about $60,000 and $40,000 lined up with “the price of 1 kg of cocaine in 2009.” 

Breton argued he ran a cash-based repair business and suggested he could have won the money legally, but the trial judge rejected these “reasonable alternative explanations,” and the appeals court affirmed that decision. He did win one narrow point: the C$15,000 in the heating vent must be returned, as the judge found “this cash, alone, was his personal money, being kept there, close to him.”

Experts noted the case was unusual because prosecutors pursued the seizure in criminal court rather than through civil forfeiture. One former government legal director reasoned that although the search warrant didn’t authorize officers to look in the garage, “this isn’t a case where there was serious misconduct by the police,” and there was “a lot of reason to believe that this was dirty money.”

Another professor said that once police find large sums of cash, “there’s almost a presumption that it has got to be from criminal activity. Period.” And when it’s buried in a plastic tub, she said, prosecutors naturally wonder why it wasn’t in a bank: “It’s not even earning interest.”

Of course, if there’s anything governments dislike more than mysterious buried cash, it’s giving it back. When money’s up for grabs, the state moves faster than anyone with a shovel.

Loading recommendations...

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com