我们的孩子在“有偏见”的育儿测试后被带走。
Our babies were taken after 'biased' parenting test

原始链接: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1wlw2qj113o

格陵兰父母正面临有限的案件复审,尽管他们曾接受“强制家庭联合”(FKU)测试——一项备受争议的计划,该计划评估父母的育儿能力。尽管一些案件正在重新审查,但涉及已完成的收养案件,例如约翰娜和乌尔里克一案,将*不会*由丹麦政府审查。 约翰娜和乌尔里克在2019年与他们早产的儿子共度了17天,之后社工和警察强行带走了他。此前,约翰娜在2010年接受了FKU测试,之后她与前任关系中的两个孩子也被带走。 2019年的评估将约翰娜定义为“自恋”且患有“智力障碍”——她强烈否认这些说法。这对夫妇描述了失去儿子的心碎,强调了FKU计划的破坏性影响以及对家庭造成的持久痛苦。

## 丹麦有争议的育儿评估 近期BBC报道详细描述了丹麦在带走父母子女方面令人担忧的做法,尤其影响格陵兰家庭。父母需要接受评估,包括罗夏墨迹测试和看似无关紧要的琐事(例如关于特蕾莎修女或阳光速度的问题),引发了对偏见和与实际育儿能力无关的担忧。 Hacker News上的讨论凸显了对这一程序的愤怒,许多人将其比作历史上的殖民主义滥用,并质疑基于此类评估进行国家干预的合理性。评论员指出,研究表明,即使在困难的情况下,孩子在寄养家庭的表现也*不如*与亲生父母在一起。 担忧的中心在于测试的主观性、潜在的文化偏见以及缺乏透明度。一些人认为,该系统优先考虑官僚控制而非家庭保护,重点应该放在解决对儿童安全的真正威胁上,而不是武断的父母“适格性”标准。这一情况引发了关于国家在家庭生活中作用以及儿童保护服务过度干预的更广泛的辩论。
相关文章

原文

But not all Greenlandic parents who had children taken into care after completing FKUs will have their cases reviewed.

Johanne and Ulrik's son was adopted in 2020 and the Danish government has said it will not review cases where children have been adopted.

Johanne, 43, was tested in 2019 during pregnancy.

Like Zammi, her son was meant to have been taken away immediately after birth.

But because he was born prematurely on Boxing Day and social workers were on holiday, she and her husband Ulrik got to keep him for 17 days.

"It was the happiest time of my life as a father," says Ulrik, 57.

"Being with my son, holding him, changing his nappy, making sure that Johanne pumps her milk before going to bed in the evening."

Then one day, two social workers and two police officers arrived at Johanne and Ulrik's home to take their son away.

The couple say they pleaded with them not to take him.

Johanne asked if she could breastfeed him one last time.

"As I was dressing my son to hand him over to his foster parents who were on their way, I felt the most horrific heartbreak," Ulrik says.

Johanne had been tested after two children from another relationship, who were five and six, were taken into care after FKU testing in 2010.

Her 2019 assessment describes her as "narcissistic" and as having "mental retardation" - a categorisation based on designations developed by the WHO which were in use at the time.

She rejects both of these descriptions of her.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com