AWS 弃用二十多项服务(其中大部分你可能从未听说过)
AWS deprecates two dozen services (most of which you've never heard of)

原始链接: https://www.lastweekinaws.com/blog/aws-deprecates-two-dozen-services-most-of-which-youve-never-heard-of/

AWS 近期进行了一次常规清理,停用了多项服务,其中包括 19 项已归档、4 项即将停止服务以及 1 项已完全停止的服务。虽然列表看起来很长,但其中许多是鲜为人知且很少使用的利基服务,例如 Cloud Directory。 主要变更包括逐步淘汰对 **Glacier**(现为 S3 存储类别)的直接 API 访问,以及由于采用率有限而停止 **S3 Object Lambda**。**CodeCatalyst** 是一款开发工具,由于未能获得发展,也将被停止服务。**Snowball Edge** 用于本地 EC2 实例和数据传输,现有用户仍可使用,但不建议用于新架构。 许多其他弃用涉及将功能整合到 **AWS Transform** 中,或用改进的替代方案替换它们,例如从 **IoT Greengrass V1** 更新到 V2。作者认为这些变化是积极的一步,表明 AWS 在推出大量有时冗余的服务后,正在简化其产品线。最终目标是将资源集中在对客户有益的核心服务上。

## AWS 弃用数十项服务 AWS 近期宣布弃用约二十项服务,其中许多服务对大多数用户来说相对不为人知。此举引发了 Hacker News 上的讨论,关于 AWS 产品数量之多以及应对其复杂生态系统的挑战。 许多评论员指出服务之间的重叠,认为 AWS 经常会创建流行的开源项目的托管版本。如此广阔的范围可能会让人感到不知所措,导致一些人更喜欢 Backblaze S3 和 Vultr 等更简单的替代方案来处理个人项目。 对话强调了在没有专门的企业级团队的情况下管理 AWS 基础设施的困难。用户建议专注于特定需求(“我需要一个托管的 Postgres 数据库”),而不是试图广泛地浏览可用选项。虽然 AWS 文档和支持通常受到好评,但 IAM(身份和访问管理)仍然是许多人的痛点。一些人也指出了许多 AWS 服务不直观的命名约定。 这些弃用也引发了对 IoT APIs 等服务现有用户的影响的担忧,尽管 AWS 通常允许现有客户继续使用。总而言之,这场讨论强调了 AWS 持续需要简化其产品并提高易用性的必要性。
相关文章

原文

AWS has done its quarterly housecleaning / “Googling” of its services, and deprecated what appears at first glance to be a startlingly long list. However, going through them put my mind at ease, and I’m hoping this post can do the same for you.

What Got the Axe

19 services are mothballed (“maintenance mode”), four are being sunset (“you can’t use these anymore after an upcoming date), and one is being end of supported (“it’s finally dead”).

A few are alarming: something like “Cloud Directory” seems like it’d be hard to replace, until you think about it and realize that you’ve never used it. Now that you really think about it, you don’t know anyone who has, either.

The ones that really jumped out to me are “Amazon Glacier,” “S3 Object Lambda,” “Snowball Edge,” and “CodeCatalyst.”

The Ones That Matter

Glacier is a red herring. Once upon a time Glacier was its own service, with its own APIs. Now, it’s an S3 storage class. What they’re doing is removing the ability to interact with Glacier via its own APIs, which frankly have always been profoundly annoying to work with.

S3 Object Lambdas have always been a bit weird. You can still have Lambdas operate on S3, and at least actual Lambdas are likely to see service improvements; Object Lambdas have been moribund for years.

CodeCatalyst was a big deal when it launched, and afterwards nary a peep was heard from it, either from customers or from AWS. This could have been something, but the will to make it that thing clearly has departed AWS along with some of its better talent.

That leaves Snowball Edge. This is a weird one, because a bunch of customers have run local EC2 instances on them, as well as using them for data transport jobs. Those customers can continue to do so (for now, at least), but if you’re architecting something new that leverages this I’d suggest making other plans.

Everything Else

A bunch of the modernization stuff that’s being Googled has simply been dragged into AWS Transform. New service marketing, same capabilities, and to top it off if you’re doing a migration you at least aspirationally like to think you won’t be doing it forever; finish your damned migrations already.

IoT Greengrass V1 let you run Lambdas on your own gear, and v2 has been out for many years. I do give this one a bit of a questioning side-eye, since it’ll require updating deployed things in the customer field, but… if it’s running detached entirely and hasn’t been updated in this long, keep on going, I guess?

Systems Manager Change Manager and Systems Manager Incident Manager are being wound down, with replacements ranging from “other Systems Manager capabilities with equally bad names” to “do what sensible people do and use a best in class third party option instead.”

The Bottom Line

Most of these deprecations appear to me to be the rotten fruit of the AWS “launch a new service to solve problem X” approach that persisted for far too long. It was clear that not all of these would be commercial successes, and I’m optimistic that clearing out their shambling corpses will let Amazon put more effort into the fewer things that actually matter for customers.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com