偏好朴素的技术
Prefer Boring Technology

原始链接: https://itwont.work/blog/prefer-boring-technology

在与问题频出的Framework笔记本电脑经历了一次令人沮丧的体验后,作者选择了一台可预测地“乏味”的戴尔Latitude(很可能是5450)——这种标准的公司笔记本电脑很容易被误认为是工作设备。虽然缺乏亮点,但它运行稳定快速,唯一的缺点是蓝牙范围有限。 这个选择源于对“乏味技术”的偏好:来自信誉良好公司的、经过充分测试的、成熟的解决方案,优先考虑可靠性而非创新。这些技术避免炒作,注重持续的性能,并拥有易于获得的售后支持和零件。 作者通过询问一项技术是否被用于对持续功能至关重要的行业来定义“乏味”,避免使用初创公司和第一/早期版本的产品。虽然令人兴奋的技术在非关键用途中有所用处,但核心购买应该优先考虑可靠性,最终节省时间和精力,避免排查新颖、未经充分验证的替代方案。

一场由一篇倡导“无聊技术”文章(itwont.work)引发的黑客新闻讨论,围绕着戴尔等老牌厂商与框架(Framework)等注重可修复性的新兴公司之间的权衡。 用户普遍认同选择可靠、成熟技术的原则,但争论戴尔是否符合这一标准。 许多评论者支持框架笔记本电脑,强调其易于升级——一位用户仅用20分钟就更换了显示屏——并认为可修复性应成为标准,而非新奇事物。 讨论还涉及“无聊技术”文章的作者,一些人根据网站“关于”页面声称其非人类身份,质疑其精神状态。 最终,该讨论强调了对耐用、易于维护技术的渴望,并将框架定位为朝着这个方向迈出的积极一步。
相关文章

原文

This one recently bought a new laptop to replace the framework laptop it had no end of issues with, and decided, on the recommendation of a few friends, to buy a Dell Latitude. It thinks the specific model is 5450, but it doesn't really care. It's a boring laptop. The kind of laptop a company will give out to all their employees, so common in the corporate world that has already confused multiple friends thinking that it is their work laptop. It is fast enough and runs everything fine, and the only complaint it can make about the thing is that the bluetooth range is low. It's a laptop that is maximally boring. You might wonder, as a nerd, why it would buy such a boring laptop. This is because it thinks it is always a good idea to prefer a boring technology over an exciting one, especially when money is on the line.

Maybe it should define "boring technology", beyond its association with the emotion of boredom. A boring technology is one that has had enough time to have been well tested. Boring technologies are produced by established companies, teams, and developers, not startups. Boring technology is used in production in places where reliability matters. You'll never hear hyperbolic marketing about how a boring technology is going to redefine anything, disrupt anything, or usher in a new era of anything. Some good examples of boring technologies in the computing space might be business laptops, or the linux kernel, or something. It's a bit of a vibes-based definition, but these are the things it looks for when evaluating a tech purchase for sufficient boringness:

  • is this used by the type of people who need their technology to consistently work? (like, in industry)

  • Is there hype around it? (if so, act with caution or avoid)

  • Does it have a reputation for reliability? Is it built with reliability in mind? (prefer reliable)

  • Is this being made by a startup? (if so, avoid)

  • Is this version 1 of something? Is this revision 1 of something? (if so, avoid)

  • Is there an existing community of knowledgeable folks who can help if anything goes wrong? Is there spare parts available? (these are both positives)

  • Is there any standout features that make you go "wow"? (if so, avoid! These tend to be the earliest things to break)

The benefit of using boring technology is that it has a much lower chance of blowing up on you. It's usually available affordably second hand, or even for free. The only thing you are sacrificing by choosing a boring option over an exciting one is a few weeks of tinkering before the exciting tech, to you, becomes boring - and then you're just left with something less reliable and less well tested than having gone with a boring option in the first place.

There's a place for interesting, exciting and novel technology. But that place is not at the core of anything you do. Buy interesting peripherals, interesting noncritical software, interesting toys. But for any serious tech purchase? Get something boring.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com