如果努力不那么费力呢?
What if hard work felt easier?

原始链接: https://jeanhsu.substack.com/p/what-if-hard-work-felt-easier

## 在工作中找到心流 今天是访问“创造空间”早鸟价(使用代码FALLEARLYBIRD可享40美元)的最后一天。“创造空间”是一个自定进度的日记课程,旨在帮助你重新连接真正重要的事情。此优惠与对耗竭的“努力工作”和感觉自然而快乐的工作之间的差异的反思相吻合。 作者最近观察到这一原则的实际应用——看到一位朋友将写书的过程描述为快乐的体验,并意识到将真实的自我与职业形象保持一致的力量。这种一致性能够带来轻松,并且常常*提高*效率,与普遍存在的“奋斗文化”形成鲜明对比。 个人经历也证实了这一观点:过去的成功源于感觉内在驱动的工作,即使在要求严格的时期也是如此。避免强迫学习,而是追求激情项目——比如构建零食盒应用程序和社区图书馆——释放了快速的进步和毫不费力的学习。 最终,关键不是强制的努力,而是帮助个人找到对他们来说感觉“显而易见”的工作,从而激发他们的内在动力。这种方法在作者的通讯*Startup Soup*中得到了进一步探讨,可以带来更大的动力和产出。思考一下什么能让你充满活力,你即使没有被要求也会做什么,以及“应该做的事情”是否阻碍了你的心流。

## 黑客新闻讨论摘要:让工作感觉更轻松 最近一篇由[jeanhsu.substack.com](jeanhsu.substack.com)上的文章引发的黑客新闻讨论,围绕着寻找*感觉*更轻松的工作(不一定是更简单),以及阻止人们享受工作的因素展开。 核心观点认为,缺乏自主权是主要的负担,尤其是在大型组织中。许多评论者强调了自雇或小型企业的优势,在这些环境中,个人拥有更多的控制权,并能从工作中获得内在回报。然而,他们也指出了小型企业日益增加的准入门槛——复杂的法规、税收以及平台垄断对创作者价值的榨取。 提出的解决方案包括强制开放协议和互操作性,以创造更公平的市场,并简化小型企业的法规。另一些人则告诫不要过于理想化,指出所有工作都存在固有的困难,以及找到有意义的项目的重要性,即使这些项目需要付出努力。人工智能也被讨论为一种潜在工具,可以降低启动项目和在创作中获得初始乐趣的门槛。最终,这场对话强调了人们对有意义和赋能工作的渴望,而不是令人精疲力竭的义务。
相关文章

原文

Today is the last day to get the early bird pricing ($40) on Creating Space, my self-paced journaling course with Buster Benson. It’s a lightly structured way to slow down and reconnect with what matters most — through thoughtful journaling prompts and reflections that help you find clarity and direction at your own pace. Join us for the fall cohort!

I’ve been thinking a lot about the difference between work that feels hard and work that just flows.

Sometimes work doesn’t feel effortful, but still leads to big results — it can just feel natural, even joyful. That’s the kind of work I’ve been leaning into lately, and I’m starting to believe it’s not just more sustainable — it can also be more effective.

I was reminded of this when I went into SF a few weeks ago to hear my friend Kate Mason speak about her new book, Powerfully Likeable, at the Ferry Building.

During her conversation with Heather Knight, two things really landed.

First, when asked what it was like to write the book, Kate said, “I know I’m supposed to say it was a slog, but honestly, it was joyful.” Getting her ideas down, things she’d been working through with clients for years, just made sense.

Second, she talked about how powerful it is when your real self and your performative self at work are as close to the same as possible. When you stop trying to lead like someone else — and instead lean into your natural way of working — everything gets easier. And the results are often better, too.

Both of those insights point to the same idea: that ease and alignment aren’t indulgent — they’re a path to real, lasting impact.

These thoughts are so counter to the current state of the tech industry, which feels like it’s glorifying grind culture and mandating long hours with butts in seats more than ever. There’s an implicit assumption that if your work doesn’t feel difficult or draining, you must not be trying hard enough.

But what if that’s completely backwards?

What if the most effective thing you could do is to follow the path that feels most obvious to you — the one that doesn’t feel like a grind at all?

What if the work that flows easily, the things you’d do even if no one asked, is where your real leverage lives?

I’ve experienced this kind of easeful, high-output work many times — both at companies and on my own.

At my first startup, I wore every hat imaginable, and it all felt obvious and fun. Building out a coaching and leadership development company for engineers felt joyful.

In fact, for a long time I felt shameful that maybe I wasn’t working hard enough. I wondered what I could do if I really pushed myself.

But when I look back, any reasonable person would say I was working incredibly hard. I have just had good luck and judgment to choose several environments where hard work felt like what I wanted to do.

In college, I’d work after dinner and stay up until 3am coding in my dorm basement, then sleep for four hours, go to class, eat lunch, and sleep another four before dinner. That bizarre bimodal sleep/work rhythm felt totally natural at the time. I think back on it fondly — not because it was “hard work,” but because I loved coding and debugging so much, it didn’t feel like work.

I’ve also built my career at early-stage startups, which are known for being a lot of work. But when I’m on the right team, working on something I care about, it feels like I’m just getting what needs to get done, done (and often this does look like putting in extra hours). On the flip side, I’ve also worked on teams where just getting through each work day felt like a grind, regardless of hours worked.

In the year or so after having Baby K, I have had this heavy sense of being behind on the latest in engineering, product development, and AI. I saw emails with tips and tools and tutorials… and avoided opening all of them.

I felt like I should catch up to stay relevant in the changing tech landscape, but that feeling just didn’t translate to action.

Then, a few months ago, I had this silly idea for a Trader Joe’s snack box builder. It made me smile to think about it existing in the world. So I downloaded Cursor, and built and shipped a basic version in two hours.

That tiny spark of joy reminded me how much I love to build. A few weeks ago, I got pulled into building a Community Library app — something I’d been noodling on for months as a shared Google Sheet. Once I had the idea for a real site, it just made sense to build it.

And without realizing it, I started learning all the things I’d been avoiding or feeling like it’d be a slog to learn: Claude Code, agents, auth flows, email automations, SSO integration. Learning those things to bring this idea to life was far more effective (and easy! It felt easy!) than forcing myself to “sit down and learn.”

Working on the community library app has felt like the most obvious, natural thing to do. With the help of my good ol’ friend Claude, I shipped a working site complete with item upload, loan request flow, and email notifications, in two weeks. The Berkeley library has over 100 people, and people are regularly adding new items

I know what it feels like to brute-force work. I try to do it all the time.

I’ll sit at my desk when I’m tired, click around, skim articles, answer a Slack message, open a doc. Two hours later: technically, I’ve “worked.” Realistically, I’ve accomplished nothing.

If I’d just let go of the “should,” I could’ve gone for a walk, or taken a nap, or called a friend. After any of those, I probably would’ve gotten more done in 15 minutes than in those two wasted hours.

Meanwhile, I launched the Community Library site in a few weeks. For someone else who didn’t really care if this utility existed in the world, building that same app could take months: requirements docs, back-and-forth with a PM, getting edge cases hammered out— even for a competent engineer. All while logging “work” hours that look reasonably productive, but could be so much more effective.

If you’re leading a team, the most effective way to get output is not to mandate effort or hours. It’s to help people find work that feels easy for them — not necessarily work they already know how to do, but work that feels obvious for them to get done by whatever means possible. You can achieve this by tapping into their internal motivation and goals and aligning what the team and company needs with what they want (this also requires being clear about what company needs aka strategic alignment, which is surprisingly often lacking). That’s where you’ll find motivation, momentum, and output you don’t have to measure by the hour.

For more on team motivation that is more effective than hour mandates, check out my post on harnessing scrappy startup energy in my other newsletter Startup Soup — also a fine example of a joyful “work” collaboration with my longtime friend and colleague Jen Dennard!

Honestly, as I get older, my tolerance for doing things I don’t want to do has really dropped off a cliff. So finding the most frictionless way to get from where I am to where I want to be is the only way I’ll get it done.

If you’re trying to find more ease in your work, here are a few questions to play with:

  • When has your work felt surprisingly easy and energizing? What were you doing?

  • What are the things you’d do even if no one asked you to?

  • Is there a “should” that’s been sitting on your to-do list for weeks (or months)? What’s holding you back? Do you actually need to get it done, or can you let go of the “should.” If you do need to do it, is there a more joyful way to approach it?

The more overlap you can find between what energizes you and what needs doing, the more effective (and sustainable) your work will be.

And it might not feel like hard work at all.

This question of how to find the kind of work that feels almost effortless — where output is high but it doesn’t feel like a grind — is something I keep coming back to, especially as I gain more and more clarity around the shape of my own work, which I will share more about soon.

If you are curious about doing some exploration here as well, you would probably enjoy Creating Space, the journaling course I created with

Benson. The course isn’t focused on work, but more broadly about creating the space to notice where things flow easily and making more room for that kind of energy in your work and life.

Early bird pricing ($40 with FALLEARLYBIRD) ends at midnight (PT) today if you want to join us for the fall cohort!

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com