随着成长,保持有主见。
Staying opinionated as you grow

原始链接: https://hugo.writizzy.com/being-opinionated/57a0fa35-1afc-4824-8d42-3bce26e94ade

公司发展到一定规模(600+人)后,面临的核心挑战是:保持目标清晰,避免“沦为臃肿”——为了取悦所有人而变得过于复杂,最终却让所有人失望。这适用于产品开发*和*沟通。 最初,产品的声音是真诚直接的,清晰地阐述其价值和局限性。随着公司规模扩大,营销往往会转向更广泛的受众,从而冒着信息被稀释的风险。作者提倡优先确定一个强有力的、定义性的声明,即*你是谁,以及你不是谁*,尤其是在早期。 以Writizzy简约的首页为例,他们强调需要在10秒内迅速抓住访客的注意力,并用清晰的宣言来表达。他们之前的公司受益于一年专注于核心身份的努力。即使是看似负面的表述(“不浪费你的时间”)在定义产品,使其与现有痛点和复杂性形成对比时,也能产生强大的效果。关键在于深思熟虑的选择,并抵制过度复杂化的冲动。

## 随着成长坚守价值观 一则Hacker News讨论的核心是,公司在扩张时如何维持其核心价值观和最初的成功。其核心观点,源于托尼·谢伊的一句话(“你真正展现价值观的方式,是通过你拒绝的机会”),即抵制有利可图但与价值观不符的机会至关重要。 许多评论者强调公司文化的重要性,以及优先考虑长期愿景而非短期收益的必要性。 这通常意味着对可能损害原始产品重点或价值观的功能、招聘或客户说“不”。 对话还涉及“劣质化”(enshittification)的概念——为了获取更多价值而故意降低产品质量——并争论其恰当的定义。 一些人将其泛指任何产品衰退,而另一些人则强调它特指主导平台上的剥削性行为。 最终,这场讨论强调了在保持公司最初成功的品质与实现增长之间的平衡的难度。
相关文章

原文

I built a company that ended up getting big (more than 600 people).

And that's not always easy to manage. Especially because you constantly need to reaffirm what you are, and what you're not.

We often talk about enshittification, and it happens a lot with software that grows too much.

They get worse because they need to keep pleasing new users, new needs, address every edge case.

This can create incredibly powerful tools, but also incredibly complex ones, and sometimes that complexity gets dumped straight onto the user.

To be clear, I'm not saying it's inevitable. There are good products that have managed to grow well. But people don't realize the difficulty behind that growth:

  • knowing how to say no
  • knowing how to hide complexity. Because complexity doesn't mean complicated
  • knowing when to cut things

Building a product is making choices.

And all of this also applies to how you talk about your product.

In the beginning, it's authentic by definition, because it's the creators talking directly. Sometimes it's clumsy, but it's direct, it's opinionated.

The creator says where they want to go, what they are, and what they're not.

Then over time, teams take over communications. You need to appeal to more people, attract new user segments, have a smoother message.

There's a real risk at that point: trying to please everyone, you end up pleasing no one.

I was having this conversation earlier with Thomas about writizzy's homepage.

It's deliberately very clean, very simple. Just a manifesto. That's it.

It's rare to do that for a company with several million dollars in annual revenue.

Because you need to convert, right?!

I think in the beginning, you should focus on saying who you are.

With my previous company, we had a manifesto for the first year.

That manifesto laid out who we were and what we wanted to do.

You're free to work freely

People coming to the site didn't need to scroll for 5 minutes through dozens of beautifully designed blocks. The truth is, for a product you don't know, nobody does that.

A new visitor needs to decide whether to continue in less than 10 seconds. There needs to be a strong statement somewhere that hooks them.

And for us, that statement is who we are. And who we're not.

A blogging platform that doesn't waste your time.

This phrase isn't positive. Someone pointed that out to us. Why not just say "A blogging platform that saves your time"?

True. It's more consensual. But we just showed up. We're inevitably going to be compared to others. That's natural.

What the hell are we doing here?

We're frustrated, and we're building this product in opposition to something.

We want to create a simple product.

But not simplistic.

And beyond that, we want to give people back the ability to write easily, without being forced to show off on their professional network or create fake engagement on some bot-filled social media platform.

Maybe tomorrow our homepage will be full of colorful blocks with flashy marketing slogans.

Or not.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com