菲科与VantageScore:美国信用评分的重量级竞争
FICO Versus VantageScore And The Heavyweight Battle for America’s Credit Scores

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/fico-versus-vantagescore-and-heavyweight-battle-americas-credit-scores

一场关于FICO信用评分主导地位的争端正在酝酿。FICO信用评分是美国贷款决策的标准,已沿用数十年。近期FICO大幅提高费用——从几美分到预计的每份抵押贷款评分10美元——引发了与征信机构Equifax、Experian和TransUnion之间的紧张关系,它们正在推广竞争对手VantageScore模型。 联邦住房金融局指责FICO存在反竞争行为,可能为VantageScore在抵押贷款审批中更广泛的应用打开大门。FICO为自己的定价辩护,认为这反映了评分的价值,并防止了贷款过于宽松的“恶性竞争”。 征信机构反驳说,VantageScore扩大了信用记录有限人群的信用获取途径。这场争端已经升级为敌对关系,FICO战略性地将利润从征信机构转移,而征信机构则通过免费提供VantageScore来回应。结果将显著影响谁控制信用获取以及全国借款人的成本。

相关文章

原文

Your credit score has long determined whether you can get a mortgage, car loan, or credit card. For decades, the FICO score dominated that decision. Created in 1956 by William Fair and Earl Isaac, it became the standard measure of a borrower’s risk and is used in about 90% of lending decisions in the U.S, according to the Wall Street Journal.

But WSJ writes that a recent $10 fee increase has sparked an open battle over control of this critical number. Fair Isaac Corp. depends on credit data from Equifax, Experian and TransUnion. Those three firms have spent years trying to weaken FICO’s power by promoting their own scoring model, VantageScore.

When Federal Housing Finance Agency chief Bill Pulte accused FICO of anticompetitive behavior and declared that VantageScore could be used in many mortgage approvals, tensions exploded. Pulte wrote, “FICO, and any other monopoly who has ripped off Americans for decades, should not be using improper efforts to threaten regulators.”

The relationship among the four companies has turned hostile. One longtime industry figure said what previously looked like a mutually beneficial partnership now appears closer to war. At FICO, CEO Will Lansing raised prices to reflect what he called the true value of their score. FICO’s mortgage-score fee climbed from just cents years ago to $4.95 in 2025 and is set to double to $10. Mortgage lenders complain the increases cut into already thin margins, especially when borrowers back out and lenders must absorb the fee.

Lansing argues that competition will motivate lenders to favor lenient scoring, warning that “choice encourages mortgage participants to shop for the most lax score” and creates a “race to the bottom.” He said, “The FICO score is the backbone of safety and soundness in the mortgage industry.” Meanwhile, the bureaus say VantageScore can evaluate millions of people who lack traditional credit histories and expand access to homeownership.

You know, the kind of people that probably shouldn't own homes...

As pressure rose in Washington, lawmakers took interest. Sen. Josh Hawley said, “FICO has abused its government-granted market power.” FICO lobbied aggressively, while Pulte and his agency pushed for more competition.

To limit the bureaus’ influence, FICO changed strategy and enabled “tri-merge resellers” to generate scores using the company’s algorithm. That move cut out the bureaus and shifted profits toward FICO, driving its stock higher and theirs lower. In response, the bureaus began offering VantageScore for free on many loans.

The outcome will determine who controls access to credit in America and how much borrowers pay. What began as a small fee hike has escalated into a fight over the financial future of millions. Stay tuned...

Loading recommendations...

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com