PSF已撤回向美国政府拨款计划提交的150万美元提案。
PSF has withdrawn $1.5M proposal to US Government grant program

原始链接: https://pyfound.blogspot.com/2025/10/NSF-funding-statement.html

2025年初,Python软件基金会(PSF)申请了150万美元的国家科学基金会(NSF)拨款,以增强Python及其软件包索引PyPI的安全性,重点是主动恶意软件检测。这是PSF首次尝试获得联邦资金,并显示出希望,该提案最初被推荐批准。 然而,PSF最终因不可接受的条款和条件而撤回了申请。NSF要求PSF确认其不推广且将来也不会推广多元化、公平性和包容性(DEI)倡议——这与PSF的核心使命和价值观直接冲突,即促进多元化社区。这一限制扩展到PSF的所有活动,并可能导致失去先前获得的资金。 虽然该拨款将大大增加PSF的预算,并能够实现对更广泛的开源生态系统有益的关键安全改进,但董事会一致决定坚持其价值观至关重要。该项目旨在创建适用于PyPI之外的工具,提高NPM和Crates.io等软件包注册表的安全性。PSF现在正在通过会员资格、捐赠和赞助寻求社区支持,以继续其重要工作。

相关文章

原文

In January 2025, the PSF submitted a proposal to the US government National Science Foundation under the Safety, Security, and Privacy of Open Source Ecosystems program to address structural vulnerabilities in Python and PyPI. It was the PSF’s first time applying for government funding, and navigating the intensive process was a steep learning curve for our small team to climb. Seth Larson, PSF Security Developer in Residence, serving as Principal Investigator (PI) with Loren Crary, PSF Deputy Executive Director, as co-PI, led the multi-round proposal writing process as well as the months-long vetting process. We invested our time and effort because we felt the PSF’s work is a strong fit for the program and that the benefit to the community if our proposal were accepted was considerable.  

We were honored when, after many months of work, our proposal was recommended for funding, particularly as only 36% of new NSF grant applicants are successful on their first attempt. We became concerned, however, when we were presented with the terms and conditions we would be required to agree to if we accepted the grant. These terms included affirming the statement that we “do not, and will not during the term of this financial assistance award, operate any programs that advance or promote DEI, or discriminatory equity ideology in violation of Federal anti-discrimination laws.” This restriction would apply not only to the security work directly funded by the grant, but to any and all activity of the PSF as a whole. Further, violation of this term gave the NSF the right to “claw back” previously approved and transferred funds. This would create a situation where money we’d already spent could be taken back, which would be an enormous, open-ended financial risk.   
Diversity, equity, and inclusion are core to the PSF’s values, as committed to in our mission statement

The mission of the Python Software Foundation is to promote, protect, and advance the Python programming language, and to support and facilitate the growth of a diverse and international community of Python programmers.

Given the value of the grant to the community and the PSF, we did our utmost to get clarity on the terms and to find a way to move forward in concert with our values. We consulted our NSF contacts and reviewed decisions made by other organizations in similar circumstances, particularly The Carpentries.  

In the end, however, the PSF simply can’t agree to a statement that we won’t operate any programs that “advance or promote” diversity, equity, and inclusion, as it would be a betrayal of our mission and our community. 

We’re disappointed to have been put in the position where we had to make this decision, because we believe our proposed project would offer invaluable advances to the Python and greater open source community, protecting millions of PyPI users from attempted supply-chain attacks. The proposed project would create new tools for automated proactive review of all packages uploaded to PyPI, rather than the current process of reactive-only review. These novel tools would rely on capability analysis, designed based on a dataset of known malware. Beyond just protecting PyPI users, the outputs of this work could be transferable for all open source software package registries, such as NPM and Crates.io, improving security across multiple open source ecosystems.

In addition to the security benefits, the grant funds would have made a big difference to the PSF’s budget. The PSF is a relatively small organization, operating with an annual budget of around $5 million per year, with a staff of just 14. $1.5 million over two years would have been quite a lot of money for us, and easily the largest grant we’d ever received. Ultimately, however, the value of the work and the size of the grant were not more important than practicing our values and retaining the freedom to support every part of our community. The PSF Board voted unanimously to withdraw our application. 

Giving up the NSF grant opportunity—along with inflation, lower sponsorship, economic pressure in the tech sector, and global/local uncertainty and conflict—means the PSF needs financial support now more than ever. We are incredibly grateful for any help you can offer. If you're already a PSF member or regular donor, you have our deep appreciation, and we urge you to share your story about why you support the PSF. Your stories make all the difference in spreading awareness about the mission and work of the PSF. 

  • Become a Member: When you sign up as a Supporting Member of the PSF, you become a part of the PSF. You’re eligible to vote in PSF elections, using your voice to guide our future direction, and you help us sustain what we do with your annual support.
  • Donate: Your donation makes it possible to continue our work supporting Python and its community, year after year.
  • Sponsor: If your company uses Python and isn’t yet a sponsor, send them our sponsorship page or reach out to [email protected] today. The PSF is ever grateful for our sponsors, past and current, and we do everything we can to make their sponsorships beneficial and rewarding.
联系我们 contact @ memedata.com