所有货币将在2030年成为稳定币:Tether联合创始人
All Currencies Will Be Stablecoins By 2030: Tether Co-Founder

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/crypto/all-currencies-will-be-stablecoins-2030-tether-co-founder

## 稳定币与金融的未来:2030年预测 Tether联合创始人里夫·柯林斯预测,到2030年**所有货币都将是稳定币**,包括美元和欧元等传统法定货币,只是在区块链上运行。他认为稳定币将在五年内成为主要的资金转移方式,这得益于代币化资产的显著优势——更高的透明度、效率和全球可访问性。 柯林斯认为,美国政府对加密货币的近期积极转变,为传统金融(TradFi)的参与打开了“大门”。他预计中心化金融(CeFi)和去中心化金融(DeFi)之间的界限将变得模糊,应用将无缝融合传统和去中心化的金融方法。 尽管承认与区块链技术相关的安全风险——桥接、智能合约和黑客攻击,柯林斯强调正在不断改进。他预见,在自我托管(技术复杂性)和信任第三方托管人之间将继续存在权衡,并且将为用户提供更多更强大的选择。最终,他相信代币化资产的实用性提升将带来显著的回报,并重塑金融格局。

相关文章

原文

Authored by Brian Quarmby via CoinTelegraph.cvom,

Tether co-founder Reeve Collins expects “all currency” to become stablecoins by 2030 as part of a broader shift that will see all forms of finance go onchain. 

“All currency will be a stablecoin. So even fiat currency will be a stablecoin. It’ll just be called dollars, euros, or yen,” said Collins in a wide-ranging interview during Token2049 in Singapore. 

“A stablecoin simply is a dollar, euro, yen, or, you know, a traditional currency running on a blockchain rail by 2030,” he added. 

Collins argues that stablecoins will be the primary method for transferring money within the next five years, as the benefits of tokenized assets have become too compelling for traditional finance to ignore.

“Probably before that, because you’re still going to use dollars. But it depends on what your definition of stablecoin is. The definition of stablecoin is essentially that you’re moving money on a blockchain,” he added. 

US crypto shift was the best thing to happen

Collins said that the best thing to ever happen to the crypto market was the positive “shift in stance” toward the sector by the US government this year.

Tether co-founder Reeve Collins. Source: Cointelegraph.

He argued that many large TradFi firms were too afraid to enter the industry out of fear of government scrutiny, and while there is still some gray area surrounding the industry, it’s a very different ball game these days.

The Tether co-founder stated that this shift has opened the “floodgates,” with the traditional finance world scrambling to enter the crypto sector and blockchain-based stablecoins being a key focus due to their inherent utility.

“Every large institution, every bank, everyone wants to create their own stablecoin, because it’s lucrative and it’s just a better way to transact. And so those floodgates are open, and what it’s going to lead to is that soon, there won’t be CeFi and DeFi,” he said.

“There’ll be applications that do things, move money, give loans, do investments, and it will be a mix of the kind of the old, traditional style investments, and then the DeFi types of investments.”

The tokenization narrative is strong

Collins said tokenized assets offer far greater transparency and efficiency than non-tokenized assets — given that they can be moved quickly across the globe without middlemen — which in turn offers more potential upside.

“That is why the tokenization narrative is so big, because everyone realizes the increase in the utility that you get from a tokenized asset versus a non-tokenized asset is so significant that even the same two assets, just once they’re moved onchain, since the utility increases, that means the return increases.” 

Downsides of going fully onchain

However, Collins acknowledged there were also risks to such a monumental shift in global finance, such as the security of blockchain bridges, smart contracts and crypto wallets.

Crypto hacks and social engineering are also key issues that need to be addressed, he said, though he emphasized that overall levels of security are “improving.”

“And so the old trade off is still going to remain there… which is if you want to be fully in control … you can do that, but it’s technically complex,” said Collins.

“If you want to trust a third party like you do traditionally with banks, there are a lot of those services like the custodial versus non-custodial, so that those services will get more robust, and people will have more options moving forward. So yes, there are always risks in technology,” he concluded. 

Loading recommendations...

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com