英特尔、三星和台积电演示 3D 堆叠晶体管
Intel, Samsung, and TSMC Demo 3D-Stacked Transistors

原始链接: https://spectrum.ieee.org/cfet-intel-samsung-tsmc

最近有关半导体技术的消息称,英特尔、三星和台积电三大厂商已成功开发出互补场效应晶体管(CFET)。 这些 CFET 允许采用单一结构,结合了 CMOS 逻辑所需的两种晶体管类型。 由于不需要额外的互连,它们还拥有更高的密度和更低的成本,英特尔报告密度质量提高了 60 纳米。 虽然制造商之间存在设计差异,例如三星使用单个纳米片与英特尔的三重片结构,但所有人都同意 CFET 的实施是开发晶体管密度加倍芯片的一个重要里程碑,预计大约需要七到十年的时间。 几年后。 此外,虽然这些原型显示出希望,但最终可能需要改进制造来解决任何性能缺陷。 总体而言,这些进步为未来微处理器的生产提供了令人兴奋的前景。

然而,三星的进展似乎更快,而且可能更实用,正如他们成功创建实际原型所证明的那样。 此外,它们对堆叠器件的源极和漏极进行电隔离的能力似乎对于克服潜在的泄漏问题至关重要。 最终,CFET 是否在不久的将来达到主流商业化生产仍不确定,在这成为广泛的现实之前,还需要进一步的研究和开发工作。 尽管如此,三星在这方面的有希望的发展无疑为推动半导体技术的发展带来了有趣和令人兴奋的前景。
相关文章

原文

A vision for future processors with nearly double the density of transistors is beginning to take shape, now that all three advanced chipmakers have demonstrated CFETS, or complementary field-effect transistors. CFETs are a single structure that stacks both the types of transistors needed for CMOS logic. At the IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting this week in San Francisco, Intel, Samsung, and TSMC showed what progress they’ve made toward the next evolution in transistors.

Chip companies are transitioning from the FinFET device structure in use since 2011 to nanosheet, or gate-all-around, transistors. The names reflect the basic structure of the transistor. In the FinFET, the gate controls the flow of current through a vertical silicon fin. In the nanosheet device, that fin is cut into a set of ribbons, each of which is surrounded by the gate. The CFET essentially takes a taller stack of ribbons and uses half for one device and half for the other. This device, as Intel engineers explained in the December 2022 issue of IEEE Spectrum, builds the two types of transistor—nFETs and pFETs—on top of each other in a single, integrated process.

Experts estimate CFETs to roll out commercially seven to ten years from now, but there is still a lot of work before they are ready.

Intel’s inverter

Intel was earliest of the three to demonstrate the CFET, unveiling an early version at IEDM back in 2020. This time around, Intel is reporting several improvements surrounding the simplest circuit that the CFET makes, an inverter. A CMOS inverter sends the same input voltage to the gates of both devices in the stack and produces an output that is the logical inverse of the input.

“The inverter is done on a single fin,” Marko Radosavljevic, principal engineer at Intel’s components research group, told reporters ahead of the conference. “At maximum scaling, it would be 50 percent” of the size of an ordinary CMOS inverter, he said.

A graph with three colored lines beside a colorful 3D figure of rectangular blocks.Intel’s inverter circuits depend on a new way of connecting the top and bottom transistors [yellow] and on contacting one of them from beneath the silicon [grey]Intel

The hitch is that squeezing in all the interconnects needed to make that two-transistor stack into an inverter circuit eats away at the area advantage. To keep things tight, Intel tried to remove some of the congestion involved in connecting to the stacked device. In today’s transistors, all the connections come from above the device itself. But later this year, Intel is deploying a technology called backside power delivery that allows interconnects to exist both above and below the surface of the silicon. Using that technology to contact the bottom transistor from below instead of from above significantly simplified the circuit. The resulting inverter had a density quality called contacted poly pitch (CPP, essentially the minimum distance from one transistor gate to the next) of 60 nanometers. Today’s 5 nm node chips have a CPP of about 50 nm.

Additionally, Intel improved the CFET stack’s electrical characteristics by increasing the number of nanosheets per device from two to three, decreasing the separation between the two devices from 50 nm to 30 nm, and using an improved geometry for connecting parts of the device.

Samsung’s secret sauce

Samsung went even smaller than Intel, showing results for 48-nm and 45-nm contacted poly pitch (CPP), compared to Intel’s 60 nm, though these were for individual devices, not complete inverters. Although there was some performance degradation in the smaller of Samsung’s two prototype CFETs, it wasn’t much, and the company’s researchers believe manufacturing process optimization will take care of it.

Crucial to Samsung’s success was the ability to electrically isolate the sources and drains of the stacked pFET and nFET devices. Without adequate isolation, the device, which Samsung calls a 3D stacked FET (3DSFET), will leak current. A key step to achieving that isolation was swapping an etching step involving wet chemicals with a new kind of dry etch. That led to an 80 percent boost in the yield of good devices.

Like Intel, Samsung contacted the bottom of the device from beneath the silicon to save space. However, the Korean chipmaker differed from the American one by using a single nanosheet in each of the paired devices, instead of Intel’s three. According to its researchers, increasing the number of nanosheets will enhance the CFET’s performance.

TSMC takes its shot

Like Samsung, TSMC too managed to get to an industrially-relevant pitch of 48 nm. Its device’s distinctions included a new way to form a dielectric layer between the top and bottom devices to keep them isolated. Nanosheets are generally formed from alternating layers of silicon and silicon germanium. At the appropriate step in the process, a silicon-germanium specific etching method removes that material, releasing the silicon nanowires. For the layer destined to isolate the two device from each other, TSMC used silicon germanium with an unusually high fraction of germanium, knowing that it would etch away faster than the other SiGe layers. That way the isolation layer could be built several steps before releasing the silicon nanowires.

From Your Site Articles

Related Articles Around the Web

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com