探索我们的收藏:金丝雀复苏器(2018)
Exploring our collection: the canary resuscitator (2018)

原始链接: https://blog.scienceandindustrymuseum.org.uk/canary-resuscitator/

馆长助理刘易斯揭示了他令人惊讶的最爱展品:一个在煤矿中使用的金丝雀复苏笼。19世纪后期,由于金丝雀对气体的敏感度更高,它们被用来检测一氧化碳等致命气体。这个由约翰·霍尔丹设计的笼子,允许矿工用氧气罐使受气体影响的金丝雀复苏。 刘易斯欣赏的是,这个笼子并非完美无瑕,它所展现的磨损痕迹揭示了它的历史和使用情况,他认为这比全新的例子提供了更多的背景信息。博物馆更青睐那些能够讲述故事的展品,即使这些故事涉及困难的主题或不完美之处。这个“脏兮兮且损坏的盒子”代表了采矿实践上的一个创新,反映了我们对气体和鸟类生理学的理解,以及科学理解与工业变革之间的相互作用。 虽然承认对动物的残忍,但刘易斯认为它具有重要的历史意义。他还提到了几个值得一提的展品:不同寻常的灯泡、一个赛博人的服装和一块阿波罗太空服的布料样本。

Hacker News 最新 | 过去 | 评论 | 提问 | 展示 | 招聘 | 提交 登录 探索我们的收藏:金丝雀复苏器 (2018) (scienceandindustrymuseum.org.uk) 19 分,由 mooreds 发帖 1 天前 | 隐藏 | 过去 | 收藏 | 讨论 指南 | 常见问题 | 列表 | API | 安全 | 法律 | 申请 YC | 联系我们 搜索:
相关文章

原文

Have you ever wondered what our curators' favourite collection items are? Here, assistant curator Lewis takes us through his rather surprising pick.

I’ve been asked many times what my favourite object is in our collection. You’d think that would be quite difficult when there are over 20,000 objects here at the Museum, and millions in the Science Museum Group’s overall collections, but it’s actually really easy. My favourite object, without a doubt, is this device that was used to resuscitate canaries in coal mines, and I’m going to tell you why.

A canary resuscitator - an aluminium cage device housing a canary, used to warn miners of the presence of carbon monoxide
Cage for reviving canary, with oxygen cylinder, made by Siebe Gorman & Co. Ltd, London.
View object in our online collection.

First, a little background history. Canaries were used in mines from the late 1800s to detect gases, such as carbon monoxide. The gas is deadly to humans and canaries alike in large quantities, but canaries are much more sensitive to small amounts of the gas, and so will react more quickly than humans.

This was discovered by John Haldane, who was asked to help determine the cause of an explosion at Tylorstown Colliery in 1896. He concluded the explosion was caused by a build-up of carbon monoxide and set out to find a way of detecting the odourless gas before it could harm humans. The result was this cage and its captive canary.

The circular door would be kept open and had a grill to prevent the canary escaping. Once the canary showed signs of carbon monoxide poisoning the door would be closed and a valve opened, allowing oxygen from the tank on top to be released and revive the canary. The miners would then be expected to evacuate the danger area.

So why is this my favourite object in our collections? Firstly, while I don’t advocate the use of animals in testing dangerous conditions, I am pleased that Haldane spared a thought for the canaries themselves and worked to make their job as non-lethal as possible. My impression from hearing about canaries in coal mines was that they were expected to die to warn people, so when I came across this object it was a huge relief (though my research on the topic has found less thoughtful cages).

I’ve even read that many miners cared deeply for their canary companions, and some disliked the advent of electronic sensors in the mid-1980s because it meant they would lose this companionship. Personally, I’m pleased that this practice has come to an end.

Another reason this is my favourite object is because it isn’t pristine. It’s scuffed and has clear signs of wear from use. This may sound strange, but when it comes to museum objects we often prefer the ones that are a little beaten up. They add more context and show how the object may have been used. We are able to research and understand much more from a used example than a pristine one.

For instance, here is another canary cage down at our sister site, the Science Museum:

A canary resuscitator - an aluminium cage device housing a canary, used to warn miners of the presence of carbon monoxide
Science Museum Group © The Board of Trustees of the Science Museum

It looks great, and the canary is definitely more life-like, but in museums like ours we love an object that can tell a story. I’d rather work with one that looks like it’s seen some action, and I’m not alone in this opinion.

Our museum aims to tell the history of innovation relating to science and industrialisation, and we often show that this history isn’t a clean one. We have objects that are dirty or damaged, or perhaps represent difficult topics, and I personally wouldn’t have it any other way. If we were to scrub away the dirt, or hide the dark spots, then the histories we tell wouldn’t be true.

So, my favourite object is a mucky and damaged box, in which a canary would have been caged, and used as an indicator of dangerous conditions. It’s not pretty, and it’s cruel to the animal, but it is representative of an innovation in mining practices, and our understanding of gases and bird physiology. It lets us tell interesting histories, and it’s a great example of how scientific understanding leads to changes in industrial practices, which is one of our major themes at this museum.

Before I go, here are some honourable mentions from our wider collections here at MSI that I have a great fondness for:

Our many unusual light-bulbs, for reasons you can see here:

A vintage lightbulb resembling a spider with wiry legs and arms
Science Museum Group © The Board of Trustees of the Science Museum

Our Cyberman costume, AKA Bob:

A gold a silver coloured cybernman, a sinister metal humanoid with a robotic or industrial-looking face
Science Museum Group © The Board of Trustees of the Science Museum

And our sample of Apollo spacesuit fabric, just like the ones Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin wore while walking on the moon. You can read more about Manchester’s role in putting humans on the moon in my post here:

A swatch of grey fabric, of the same kind used in the Apollo spacesuits
Science Museum Group © The Board of Trustees of the Science Museum

If you’d like to find out more about any of these objects, or come to the museum to research them then you can browse our collections online at http://collection.sciencemuseum.org.uk/ or email [email protected].

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com