A recent paper updates the Standard Model's prediction of the muon's anomalous magnetic moment, addressing a long-standing discrepancy between theory and experiment. The original difference of 3.5 standard deviations sparked excitement about potential "new physics" beyond the Standard Model. The discrepancy arose because there are two methods to make the prediction: a "data-driven" approach using experimental interaction rates and a "brute-force" method using Lattice QCD simulation. One important measured interaction rate was significantly updated. This measurement disagreed with previous measurement, and made the data-driven method worse. The "brute force" Lattice QCD calculation got better and is now in line with the experimental value. The mystery is resolved by switching from the "data-driven" method to the Lattice QCD simulation. While this resolution is important, some commenters express mild disappointment as an anomaly would imply scientific revolution. It also highlights the ongoing evolution of the Standard Model, its successes, and its known limitations (like gravity and neutrino mass). Some say that this is not truly a part of the Standard Model and is just an add-on.