特朗普议程中的“老年人奖金”将暂时为65岁以上美国人提供救济
'Senior Bonus' In Trump Agenda Bill Would Temporarily Provide Relief To Americans Over 65

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/senior-bonus-trump-agenda-bill-would-temporarily-provide-relief-americans-over-65

众议院以微弱优势通过了名为“一个宏大美丽的法案”(One Big Beautiful Bill Act)的法案,其中包括一项针对65岁以上美国人的临时税收抵免,被称为“老年人奖金”(senior bonus),金额为4000美元,有效期为2025年至2028年。这是对特朗普总统竞选承诺中取消社保税收计划的一种规模较小的替代方案。这项抵免针对低收入老年人,单身报税者年收入超过7.5万美元,已婚联合报税者年收入超过15万美元将逐步减少抵免金额。 专家表示,之所以做出这一改变,是因为国会规则禁止在预算协调法案中调整社保,而且取消社保税收将不成比例地使较富裕的老年人受益。尽管未能完全兑现最初的承诺,但这项税收抵免仍得到了美国退休人员协会(AARP)、美国老年公民协会和60 Plus协会等老年人权益组织的支持。分析人士指出,这是一种成本更低的替代方案,不会像完全取消税收的提案那样影响社会保障信托基金。该法案现已提交参议院审议。


原文

Authored by Kevin Stocklin via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, narrowly approved by the House of Representatives on May 22, includes a tax break for Americans older than 65 in the form of a temporary deduction of $4,000.  

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-La.) speaks to the media at the U.S. Capitol after the House narrowly passed a bill forwarding President Donald Trump's agenda, in Washington, on May 22, 2025. Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

In lieu of President Donald Trump’s campaign pledge to eliminate taxes on Social Security benefits, this deduction, called the “senior bonus,” would offer a smaller tax cut, targeted to benefit lower-income seniors. 

The House bill allows seniors, whether they take the standard deduction or itemize their returns, to deduct an additional $4,000 from their taxable income. It phases out for single filers earning more than $75,000, or $150,000 for taxpayers filing jointly. 

The deduction would last from 2025 through 2028. For those who qualify, it would amount to dollar savings of $480 for those in the 12 percent tax bracket, and $880 for those in the 22 percent tax bracket. The deduction reduces taxable income and is distinct from a tax credit, which would be a dollar-for-dollar reduction in taxes.

Jessica Riedl, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute focusing on budget, tax, and economic policy, told The Epoch Times that “Republicans converted the pledge of no taxes on Social Security benefits into the $4,000 additional senior deduction for two reasons.”

“First, because congressional rules forbid altering Social Security or its taxes in a reconciliation bill,” Riedl said. “Second, ending Social Security income taxes would overwhelmingly benefit wealthier seniors, because their benefits currently face higher taxes, and this deduction is instead targeted to lower-earning seniors.”

According to what is called the 1974 Byrd Rule, changes to Social Security-related provisions cannot be included in budget reconciliation bills in the Senate and must be enacted through regular legislation, which is subject to a filibuster. No Democrat representatives voted in favor of the House bill, which passed 215-214.

According to a May 16 White House statement in support of the House budget bill, it “provides historic tax relief to Social Security recipients“ and ”slashes taxes on seniors’ Social Security benefits.” 

The bill now proceeds to the Senate, which will have the opportunity to approve or alter it. Trump has urged the Senate to pass the bill, which has also received support from senior citizens’ advocates. 

It’s not perfect, but given the political realities of no bipartisan support, we urge Republicans to unite and pass ‘The One, Big Beautiful Bill,’” Saul Anuzis, president of the American Association of Senior Citizens, said in a statement.

The American Association of Retired Persons also endorsed the senior bonus, with its chief advocacy and engagement officer Nancy LeaMond stating in a May 5 letter that it was “a targeted and commonsense adjustment that reflects today’s economic realities.”

And calling the provision “a win for seniors across the country,” Jim Martin, chairman of the 60 Plus Association, stated that “the president and House Republicans are providing much needed tax relief to middle and low-income seniors.” 

The senior bonus provides significantly less tax relief than eliminating Social Security taxes altogether; however, it benefits the Social Security trust, which analysts, including those at the Peter G. Peterson Foundation, project will be depleted in 2035, at which point benefits would be reduced by 17 percent.

Ultimately, the $4,000 deduction is significantly cheaper than the original Social Security tax proposal—$20 billion annually versus $120 billion,” Riedl said. “It also does not divert money out of the Social Security trust fund like the original proposal would have.” 

The reduction in revenue from the senior bonus would come out of general revenue from federal income tax, rather than from the Social Security fund, as would have been the case if the Social Security tax were eliminated. 

Up to 85 percent of Social Security benefits are currently taxable for single filers earning more than $34,000 and for joint filers above $44,000, according to the Internal Revenue Service. Up to 50 percent of benefits are taxable for single filers earning $25,000–$34,000, and for joint filers earning $32,000–$44,000. 

Loading...

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com