(comments)

原始链接: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44028286

This Hacker News thread discusses iText's improved table rendering speed. A commenter reminisces about using iText 20 years ago, noting its continued relevance. Another user points out that the title was changed to remove the claim of "95% faster" rendering, arguing that the original title was more informative about the scale of the improvement. A moderator explains that removing specific numbers from titles is standard practice to avoid baity titles and discussions focused on the accuracy of the numbers, particularly when the claimed improvements might be based on specific, unusual conditions. They argue that a more general title, like "faster," allows the article itself to demonstrate the improvement's magnitude. However, some believe the specific improvement percentage is important context for the nature of the update.

相关文章
  • 我们如何加快 iText 表格渲染速度 2025-05-21
  • 2025-05-22
  • 2025-05-20
  • 2025-05-20
  • (评论) 2025-03-26

  • 原文
    Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login
    Making iText's table rendering faster (itextpdf.com)
    30 points by whizzx 1 day ago | hide | past | favorite | 5 comments










    It's funny that iText is still around. I used this 20 years ago in a hybrid .NET/Java web app that needed a PDF renderer and it was pretty much the top choice. The rendering still looks the same!


    Heading compaction buried the lede: "made rendering faster" vs "made rendering 95% faster".

    Dear @dang, may we have the "95%" back?



    It's standard practice to take those kinds of numbers out of title, because they make the title more baity, and often cause much of the discussion to focus on debate about how accurate/normal the figure is. It's sufficient for the title to say "faster" then let the article demonstrate how much faster it can be in different scenarios.


    But there is a qualitative difference between 5% faster and 95% faster: the latter usually meaning a serious rework, and the former being a small incremental improvement.

    I'd be okay with replacing "95% faster" with "several times faster" to still convey the point.



    It's not about the size of the number or improvement; we do the same thing when the number is "10,000%", which is not unusual in the titles we see here.

    The problem with these kinds of titles – and this is no comment on this particular article (I haven't checked, because it's irrelevant) – is that sometimes writers will put a figure in the title that was achieved in a one-off result under very specific/unusual conditions, whereas the realistic improvement under more normal conditions is like 20% or 50% – still great, just not what the title claimed.

    Then when that happens, the discussion becomes dominated by comments pointing that out and debating the validity of the tests and results – even if the article does a good job of revealing those details.

    We've found we can reduce that effect by taking the numbers out of the title altogether.







    Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact



    Search:
    联系我们 contact @ memedata.com