(评论)
(comments)

原始链接: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44004224

Hacker News 上的一个帖子讨论了 xAI 在 GitHub 上发布 Grok 聊天助手提示词一事。用户对这种透明度表示怀疑,指出自开源以来,X/Twitter 算法库就没有更新过。一些人认为发布提示词只是为了转移公众对 Grok 过去争议的注意力,特别是关于其与南非相关的偏见回应和“白人种族灭绝”叙事。 评论强调了操纵的可能性以及难以验证发布的提示词是否是生产中使用的唯一提示词。一位用户提到了 Grok 的私有版本“BigBrain 模式”,引发了对其能力的质疑。虽然一些人赞赏这种透明度的努力,但其他人则批评埃隆·马斯克的所有权,并对潜在的偏见表示担忧。一些用户链接到外部资源,引用了 Grok 的南非事件和 X/Twitter 算法库停滞不前的相关信息。最终,该帖子反映出人们对 xAI 是否真正致力于透明和道德 AI 开发的谨慎乐观和深深怀疑并存的态度。


原文
Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login
Prompts for our Grok chat assistant and grok bot on X (github.com/xai-org)
37 points by taubek 2 days ago | hide | past | favorite | 23 comments










Hmmm, very little mention of South Africa in these prompts.


https://www.theverge.com/news/668220/grok-white-genocide-sou...

Another lame excuse and some faux transparency to go with it.



> faux transparency

Yep, this isn't the first time they've made this play. Remember when they open sourced the X/Twitter algorithm in the name of transparency-maxxing? Those repos haven't been updated for nearly two years now.



The repo has served its intended purpose: his legion of bizarre fans can now say "it's open source" and brag about his transparency


Call me cynical but this smells like a PR stunt to get people talking about how much controlling the system prompt matters to everyone’s interaction with assistants.

Most people wouldn’t give it a second thought unless something like this happened and it’s now plain to see how quickly they can be (poorly) manipulated.





Buried deep in the #include Tom Sharpe Riotous Assembly and #include Jeremy Taylor Ag Pleez Daddy et al material.


It's response for their South African debacle. https://x.com/xai/status/1923183620606619649


Regardless of what one thinks about Mr Musk, this is very good move and ethical thing to do and I hope other LLMs would follow the lead


Ethical or unethical doesn't really matter when it's owned and operated by a racist POS ands his collaborators.


It's also entirely performative garbage. There's nothing that actually proves these are the (only) prompts being used, and if Elon Musk wants Grok to start pushing bullshit again he will do it. But this time it'll be more subtle and they'll point to this "transparency" to explain how it's not possible.


This was interesting: "Grok 3's BigBrain mode is not publicly available." - What is "BigBrain"?


It's a private version of Grok that can query the US Social Security database to locate fertile Elon Musk fans with desirable genes. /s


I know this is fake but I like that it puts pressure on openai etc to be more transparent.


"We need to feign some transparency and release something. Quick, sanitize the instructions and put something on a repo, doesn't need to be exactly what's in production."


Similar to what they did to the X/twitter open source algorithm (which hasn't been updated in 2 years)


Pretty basic stuff that you'd been in a blog post from 2022.


Quite a biased dataset you have there...


No mention of the "white genocide" story aka why they need to whitewash their system prompt and are releasing this. They were quite efficient in covering it up.


Elon claims that was done by an "unauthorized employee"

I believe that as much as I believe it when a politician says it was an "overzealous intern"



It must have been Adrian Dittmann!




Why are y'all associating with a neo-Nazi wannabe?






Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact



Search:
联系我们 contact @ memedata.com