乌克兰议会批准与美国矿产协议,以期确保未来获得武器。
Ukraine's Parliament Ratifies US Minerals Deal In Hopes Of Securing Future Arms

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/ukraines-parliament-ratifies-us-minerals-deal-hopes-securing-future-arms

乌克兰议会一致批准了一项与美国备受争议的资源协议,泽连斯基政府希望此举能确保华盛顿持续提供军事援助。第一副总理尤利娅·斯维里登科称其为新的战略伙伴关系的基础。虽然批评人士警告称这可能是美国掠夺资源,但有报道称该协议的全部细节并不完全透明,加剧了反对派对隐瞒信息的指控。核心协议提到了进一步的文件——一份有限合伙协议和一份基金会章程——一些议员声称这些文件已经最终确定,但政府否认了这一点。尽管特朗普之前的言论和美国外交政策可能发生转变,但考虑到美国对保护其投资的兴趣日益浓厚,这项矿产协议表明美国将继续向乌克兰提供武器。然而,这项协议是长期的,预计其细节将在十年或更长时间内逐步展开。

相关文章

原文

The minerals deal is now official and legally binding for Ukraine as on Thursday Ukraine's parliament voted in favor of ratifying the controversial resources agreement with the United States. This was a final key step in its adoption.

The Zelensky government is hoping this will more firmly secure future military assistance from Washington. The vote was unanimous: 338 Ukrainian lawmakers approved of ratifying it, and none opposed.

Via AFP

"The Ukrainian Parliament has ratified the historic Economic Partnership Agreement between Ukraine and the United States," First Deputy Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko announced on X.

"This document is not merely a legal construct — it is the foundation of a new model of interaction with a key strategic partner," Svyrydenko added.

Critics have warned that this could be a big resource grab by the United States, but since it's signing was accomplished in Washington last month, Trump administration rhetoric toward Kiev has softened. For example, Trump is no longer demanding that Ukraine quickly move toward holding new presidential and parliamentary elections.

Meanwhile, Moon of Alabama has highlighted that there's still a fight on as well as confusion over some suppressed details of the deal, citing Strana, which reported (machine translation)...

The opposition already accuses the authorities of concealing the main points about the deal. The fact is that the agreement on the creation of the fund, signed last week and already made public, is being submitted for ratification, and there are very few specifics in it. This is essentially a framework agreement. For all the main points in the text of the agreement, there are references to another document - the Limited Partnership Agreement. There is also a third document - the Foundation's charter.

A number of deputies claim that all three documents have actually been signed (or agreed upon). But they showed only one-the least important and most abstract of them, from which it is not even clear what the Foundation will do in general.

The government denies this, saying that only one document has been signed, and the rest will still be discussed.

Trump has indicated the US could just walk away from efforts to mediate peace, if neither side is a willing partner. The White House has not said whether this means it would halt arms for Ukraine's military, or intelligence-sharing. 

But the minerals deal means the US is indeed very likely to continue arming Kiev. After all, the White House now has more of an interest in protecting US 'investment' now and into the future.

Still, it is a very long-haul agreement: "Two supplements would spell out the details and would be published at a later date, officials have said about the deal which might not see a payoff for a decade or longer," France24 notes.

Loading...

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com