特朗普的三重反对
President Trump's Threefold Opposition

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/president-trumps-threefold-opposition

在这篇分析特朗普政府反对势力的文章中,维克多·戴维斯·汉森指出,民调机构、媒体和民主党/左翼发起了三管齐下的攻击。他认为,民调机构故意低估特朗普的支持者,以制造虚假叙事并激励反对派,这与以往选举中的错误如出一辙。汉森批评媒体对拜登认知能力的沉默,认为这是与民主党内部人士的合谋。他认为,由于民主党缺乏明确的议程或领导力,媒体转而扮演反对派的角色,仅仅依靠攻击特朗普。他指出,民主党缺乏令人信服的“昔日辉煌”的叙事,因为他们在边境政策、外交政策和通货膨胀问题上的政策可以说是失败的。因此,反对派诉诸于对特朗普的个人攻击和夸大其词的指控,其驱动力是对特朗普政府可能成功的恐惧。


原文

Authored by Victor Davis Hanson via DailySignal.com,

At the end of the 100 days of the Trump administration, let’s just review for a moment the opposition to it. 

And it’s actually, if you think about it, a tripartite, a threefold opposition:

  1. pollsters, 

  2. the media, 

  3. and the Democratic Party and the institutionalized Left.

The pollsters have President Donald Trump down four or five points. But when you actually look at the Rasmussen poll or Mark Penn’s poll, a Democratic centrist, Trump is almost even. And then when you look with greater clarity at The New York Times poll that has him way down, you see that only 37% of the people polled voted for Donald Trump. But Donald Trump won by almost a point and a half. Don’t you think it should have been, I don’t know, 51%-49%? So, they were deliberately, in the case of The New York Times, under-polling Trump supporters.

The same was true with The Washington Post. They polled over 2,000 people, but only 840 were identified as Trump voters. Shouldn’t that have been half?

So, what am I getting at? 

We’re getting right back to what happened in 2016 when the polls were completely wrong. 

The same thing happened in 2020 when they overestimated former President Joe Biden’s strength by four or five points. And then, even in 2024, the NPR poll had—on the last day of the election—they had then-Vice President Kamala Harris winning by four points.

The Des Moines Register had Iowa lost to Trump by three points. He won it by 12.

So, what the pollsters are doing—not that Trump hasn’t lost some to the controversy over the trade wars—but the pollsters are trying to create momentum, fundraising, and jazz up opposition.

Then we turn to the media. The media’s in a fight with the Democratic Left now because of the scandal of Joe Biden. The Democratic Left is saying, “Well, you were a journalist. If you thought he was demented or cognitively challenged, why didn’t you report it?” But the journalists are saying, “We couldn’t get close to him. He looked OK for us because you had him in such a guarded environment.” In truth, they’re both guilty.

Do you remember those press conferences by then-White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre? Did anyone ever hear one question on those daily or three or four times a week press conferences? “Miss Jean-Pierre, is Joe Biden cognitively able to navigate himself to the podium? What is the nature of his cue cards? Have you had a Montreal Cognitive Assessment of him?” There was nothing. 

It was a combination of the Democratic Party, the Biden insiders, and the media.

And here’s another point, very quickly.

The media has gained a lot of influence and power in the opposition because there is no opposition on the Democratic Party. So, in lieu of an alternate agenda, the media has taken it upon themselves to use the only strategy that the Democratic Party can come up with. And that is to attack Donald Trump.

Now, what do I mean by that? If you look at the Democratic Party and the Left in general, they have boxed themselves in. 

On the one hand, they have no institutional power; no ability to pass legislation, losing the House and the Senate; no presidency, White House; no executive orders. 

Ultimately, all of the cherry-picked district and circuit judges will be overturned by a largely conservative Supreme Court.

In lieu of actual power, then you look at what is the alternative. 

Maybe the alternative is a 1994 Newt Gingrich Contract with America, an alternate agenda: Yes, we can do better on the border than you can. Yes, we have a better foreign policy with Iran. 

There’s nothing. There’s no shadow government. There’s not a young Bill Clinton ascendant. There’s no young Barack Obama. There’s nobody. There’s no leaders. There’s no agenda. Nothing. It’s nihilism.

And so, let’s look at the third element. 

Do they have a good old days?

Can they say, “Donald Trump ruined things”? “They were so good under Biden. The border was—we liked it open. Twelve million, we could have got 20 million illegal aliens. Let’s go back to that. We had a wonderful retreat from Afghanistan. Picture perfect. We can do it again. The Iran—the theater war in Ukraine and Iran, that wasn’t our fault. Maybe it was inevitable. We had a really good inflation—we had a little hyperinflation of 9%.”

So, there is no alternative good old days. They can’t say Donald Trump wrecked something because they had wrecked the country.

So, what are we left with? 

We’re left with Donald Trump wore a blue suit at the Vatican funeral. Donald Trump is a fascist. No. According to Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, he is a Nazi. No. According to former Vice President Al Gore, he is a Nazi. No. According to members of the Congress, is he deserving a polite conversation? You have to use the F-word. Or maybe it’s the S-word.

It’s smutty mouth, potty mouth video.

What is the one principle that ties them all together? 

We’re gonna talk about that in the next video.

But it’s about fear that Donald Trump’s first 100 days are not as chaotic and bad as they tell us. 

But we might be on the cusp of something that will be very, very successful and will ensure Donald Trump has a successful presidency.

Loading...

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com