加入W3C探索兴趣小组:标准从这里开始
Join the W3C Exploration Interest Group: where standards start

原始链接: https://www.w3.org/blog/2025/join-the-w3c-exploration-interest-group-where-standards-start/

W3C探索兴趣小组 (IG) 充当 Web 身份、认证和信任的研发实验室。它弥合了现实世界实施和 Web 标准之间的差距,专注于在寻求解决方案之前提出正确的问题。这个小组面向所有为 Web 构建应用、处理 Web 策略或努力实现互操作性的人,尤其是在不断变化的身份环境中,例如逐步淘汰 Cookie 和新的浏览器 API。 IG 识别技术差距,探索新兴的身份模型(钱包、凭证、联合身份),并解决标准化组织忽略的用例。它还监测需要技术响应的监管信号,并旨在防止标准碎片化。 探索 IG 欢迎实施者、研究人员、政策制定者以及任何在 Web 身份方面有见解或面临挑战的人的贡献。社区成员可以在其公共 GitHub 存储库中贡献想法、提出问题和参与讨论。小组每两周举行一次会议,讨论社区提出的主题,促进合作并确定未来标准化工作的领域。

Hacker News上对W3C探索兴趣小组的公告进行了一番讨论,对话集中在W3C标准的作用和相关性上。一位用户建议制定一个阻止不需要的广告资源的浏览器扩展标准。一些评论者对此表示怀疑,声称W3C主要制定的标准要么被忽略,要么是从WHATWG复制而来。ActivityPub被提出作为一个潜在的例子,但这很快就被驳斥了。另一位用户声称谷歌现在是网络标准的事实上的来源,这引发了人们的担忧,即开发者优先考虑Chrome的实现,而不管官方标准化或bug如何。另一人反驳说,鉴于Chrome系浏览器的庞大用户群,优先考虑它们是有意义的,因为用户优先考虑功能而非技术纯度。

原文

You know the feeling. You’re in a product meeting, skimming GitHub issues, or catching up on another EU regulatory proposal, and you realize there’s something missing in how we’re building for the web. Maybe it’s a technical shortfall, maybe it’s a user experience no one’s nailed yet, or maybe it’s a whole category of use case the current standards aren’t touching with a ten-foot pole.

That’s where the W3C Exploration Interest Group (IG) comes in.

We’re not a working group. We’re not here to define normative specs. We’re here to connect the dots between the real world and the standards world and to ask better questions before jumping to answers. Think of us as the early R&D lab for identity, authentication, and trust on the web.

Why this group, and why now?

If you’re building for the web, navigating its policy landscape, or just trying to make something interoperable, this group’s for you. Why? Because web identity is in flux. Cookies are on the way out. Federated login flows are being rebuilt. Browsers are experimenting with new APIs. And regulators? They're not exactly standing still either.

If we want a web that works for real users, across real use cases, we need more people at the table who can say:

“Here’s what’s happening in production, and here’s what we still don’t understand.”

That’s what the Exploration IG is here for: to find the gaps, to make space for disagreement, to spotlight use cases that standards groups haven’t prioritized yet, and to build the bridges that might become working group charters down the line.

What we’re exploring?

We don’t have a single-track agenda—but here’s the kind of stuff that gets us talking:

  • Technical gaps between browser implementations and web specs
  • Emerging wallet models, identity credentials, and federation flows
  • Use cases that span trust frameworks, sectors, or jurisdictions
  • Fragmentation risks when multiple standards solve the same problem differently
  • Regulatory signals that need a better technical response

Contribute your ideas!

Our GitHub repo is public, and we actively welcome ideas and discussion there; this is an open forum, and everyone is welcome to contribute their ideas. If you see something in the wild that standards groups should be thinking about, bring it to us. Whether you’re an implementer, a researcher, a policymaker, or someone with a stubborn browser bug and a vision, open an issue. We want to hear from you. And if it turns into a recurring collaboration, we’d be delighted to have you join the group.

Some of the best conversations start with “I’m not sure this fits anywhere else."

And that’s exactly the kind of conversation we want to have. So if you’ve ever felt like there’s something important that doesn’t quite have a home in the standards process yet, maybe it belongs with us.

We meet every other week and organize sessions around topics raised by the community. Join us. Listen in. Bring your questions. Or just open an issue and see what happens.

Learn more about the Exploration Interest Group.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com