(评论)
(comments)

原始链接: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43416615

在Hacker News上,一篇关于写作中不提及批评者的帖子引发了短暂的讨论。一位评论者建议将纳博科夫的《微暗的火》作为参考批评者的案例研究。另一位用户nashashmi似乎暗示,如果某人错了,那么他们的观点就无关紧要。Nitwit005指出,引用相关作品是很正常的,而且可以做到不粗鲁。_Algernon_ 指出引用来源以避免剽窃的重要性,尤其是在学术界。Blast澄清说,最初的帖子是关于不提及批评者,这与未能引用来源不同,什么都不做也符合不提及批评者和避免剽窃的条件。

相关文章
  • (评论) 2024-01-23
  • 评论: 2023-10-17
  • (评论) 2024-02-20
  • (评论) 2024-01-10
  • (评论) 2024-07-08

  • 原文
    Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login
    When writing, don't mention people who've criticized you (twitter.com/paulg)
    10 points by amrrs 29 minutes ago | hide | past | favorite | 5 comments










    Anyone who wants a case study in referencing detractors can read Pale Fire by Nabakov. It’s a beautiful 80 page epic poem with 200 pages of footnotes by the author’s less talented and insecure colleague.


    > if you are wrong, no one …

    … No one cares about what you are saying, so it doesn’t matter anyways.



    Mentioning other relevant work is normal. You can do it without being a jerk.


    Better not working in academia then, cause you will have a plagiarism accusation coming for you.


    You can fail to mention critics without copying anyone. For example, doing nothing at all satisfies both conditions.

    Maybe you meant failing to cite authors you quote? That's not what the OP is talking about.







    Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!


    Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact



    Search:
    联系我们 contact @ memedata.com