埃隆·马斯克驳斥“网络卡车轰炸机”FSD 理论:“自动驾驶仪需要细心的驾驶员”
Elon Musk Dismisses 'Cybertruck Bomber' FSD Theory: "Autopilot Requires Attentive Driver"

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/elon-musk-dismisses-cybertruck-bomber-fsd-theory-autopilot-requires-attentive-driver

克拉克县警长凯文·麦克马希尔报告称,赛博卡车爆炸案嫌疑人马修·利夫斯伯格在爆炸前自杀身亡。然而,罗根·奥汉德利等互联网侦探提出了关于利夫斯伯格之死的其他理论。奥汉德利表示,利弗斯伯格可能是被其他人枪杀的,而特斯拉在到达特朗普酒店时处于自动驾驶状态。 特斯拉首席执行官埃隆·马斯克驳斥了第二种情况,称车辆的自动驾驶仪需要驾驶员坐在座位上专心致志。 Tesla 车辆配备了车载摄像头,可以监控驾驶员的注意力,并在 FSD 启动时向他们发出警报。奥汉德利的理论要求相机被欺骗,但根据特斯拉对 FSD 操作的描述,这似乎不太可能。


原文

Clark County Sheriff Kevin McMahill told reporters on Thursday that the Cybertruck bomber, Matthew Livelsberger, a 37-year-old Green Beret, died by a self-inflicted gunshot wound to the head just moments before the detonation outside Trump's hotel in Las Vegas. This sequence of events is based on the official statements from law enforcement. However, speculation on X, particularly among internet sleuths, has brought up alternative theories regarding the timing of Livelsberger's death. 

Rogan O'Handley, aka "DC Draino" on X, floated two scenarios about Livelsberger's final moments:

Now that we know the Vegas suspect was found with a bullet in his head, I see 2 possible scenarios:

1. He shot himself - he was planning to commit suicide & didn't want to risk being burned alive

2. He was shot by someone else & the Tesla was auto-pilot navigated to the Trump hotel

"A long fuse could've been lit, a timer could have been set, or the bomb could have been remotely detonated I wonder if anyone in the vicinity heard a gunshot That would help confirm where the car was when he was shot," O'Handley wrote in another post. 

Tesla's Elon Musk quickly dismissed the second scenario, stating, "Autopilot will not function unless it detects an attentive person in the driver's seat."

Tesla vehicles have a cabin camera that monitors driver attentiveness and provides audible alerts when FSD is engaged. The camera is mounted above the rearview mirror. 

"Like other Autopilot features, Full Self-Driving requires that the driver pay attention to the road, their surroundings, and other road users," Tesla wrote on its website under the "Driver Attentiveness" section of FSD. 

Tesla said, "The cabin camera does not require full visibility of the driver's eyes in order to monitor attentiveness. The system is still active, for example, if the driver is wearing sunglasses." 

"If the cabin camera does not have clear visibility of the driver's hand and arm locations, Full Self-Driving periodically displays a message reminding the driver to apply slight force to the steering wheel," Tesla continued. 

It noted, "If the driver repeatedly ignore prompts to apply slight force to the steering wheel or to pay attention, Full Self-Driving displays a series of escalating warnings and, if those warnings are ignored, disables for the rest of the drive and displays the following message." 

What's apparent from Tesla's description of how FSD works suggests any scenario with Livelsberger shot in the head well before the bombing would be extraordinarily hard to trick the camera. 

X users should call on Musk to release the cockpit camera footage and any other recordings from the high-tech EV truck to disprove O'Handley's second scenario. Additionally, footage from charging stations could provide valuable insights into what happened leading up to the bombing. We're sure the FBI is already doing this... 

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com