为什么欧盟在全球人工智能竞赛中落后
Why The EU Is Falling Behind In The Global AI Race

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/why-eu-falling-behind-global-ai-race

欧盟(EU)对数据和技术的严格监管阻碍了欧盟内部人工智能的进步。 英国在人工智能创造方面采取了更具适应性的方法,有望从欧盟的过度监管中受益,并成为人工智能领域的全球领导者。 意大利前总理马里奥·德拉吉承认欧盟的竞争劣势,但提出了可能加剧这一问题的政策。 欧盟的过度监管一度被认为是英国脱欧支持者提出的一个牵强的想法,但目前欧盟领导人自己已经承认并解决了这个问题。 然而,在人工智能方面,欧盟由于严格的隐私法和复杂的数据保护要求而落后。 与此同时,美国培育了开发先进人工智能系统的公司,包括ChatGPT、自动驾驶汽车、无人机和许多其他创新技术。 最近欧盟内部受法规启发的创新例子涉及对带有不可拆卸瓶盖的饮料瓶进行改造。 尽管有人批评欧洲国家之间的竞争力差距,但欧盟官员认识到改革的必要性,并解决了前总理马里奥·德拉吉撰写的一份报告中的担忧。 他提出的补救措施包括进一步欧盟一体化、增加政府支出和脱碳举措——导致成本增加、竞争减少和税收增加。 相反,英国在监管较少的情况下,旨在促进人工智能取得更大进展,英国信息专员办公室(ICO)最近决定允许用户数据在英国训练人工智能模型,使 Meta 等公司能够创建尖端的人工智能模型。 人工智能应用程序仅在英国境内可用。 Meta总裁尼克·克莱格爵士承认欧盟法规对英国技术创新造成的损害。 作为前副首相和欧洲议会议员,尼克爵士对未来科技趋势具有重大影响力和洞察力。 英国拥有顶尖大学、进入资本市场的机会,并拥有谷歌 DeepMind 等著名的人工智能研究机构,将自己定位为新兴人工智能技术的潜在全球领跑者。 如果欧洲由于繁琐的监管而在人工智能应用方面继续落后,那么欧洲将面临落后于竞争对手的危险,阿拉伯联合酋长国等国家的成功案例就证明了这一点。

相关文章

原文

Via OilPrice.com,

  • The EU's stringent regulations on data and technology are stifling AI innovation within the bloc.

  • The UK, with a more flexible approach to AI development, could benefit from the EU's regulatory overreach and become a global leader in AI.

  • Former Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi acknowledges the EU's competitiveness gap but proposes solutions that may exacerbate the problem.

EU regulatory overreach has gone from a Brexiteer conspiracy theory and source of ridicule to something that  EU leaders themselves acknowledge and are trying to address. But when it comes to AI, they’re already behind, says James Price

If you’ve bought a plastic drinks bottle in recent months, you may have noticed a maddening change – the lid can  no longer be detached from the rest of the bottle. You may find this rather annoying; you may even pretend to yourself that you like the increase in spills and mess in order to help save the environment. Regardless, it represents one of the major regulation-led innovations emanating from the European Union.

At the same time, the United States has fostered companies that have created large language models like ChatGPT, self-driving cars, drones, commercial space walks, and many, many other things that I’m not smart enough to understand.

This shocking gap in competitiveness across Europe has, like many ideas, gone from a crazy Brexiteer conspiracy theory and source of ridicule to something that  EU leaders themselves acknowledge and are trying to address.

This has come to a head with the recent publication of former Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi’s long-awaited report into the EU’s competitiveness gap. Whilst correctly diagnosing some of the problems, the remedies it offers are – inevitably – more European integration, government spending and decarbonisation. That means more expensive energy, less competition or experimentation between member states, and higher taxes. Good luck with that!

But Mr Draghi’s first lament in a piece he wrote on the report focuses on something even the layman knows is a potentially enormous growth area, artificial intelligence (AI). This new wellspring of technologies could prove to quite literally be a deus ex machina for the economic and governmental ills of the world, and there’s no reason why Europe shouldn’t be able to be a leader in it. 

Mr Draghi’s report literally proposes “making it easier for researchers to commercialise ideas”. But the EU has been blocking some of the biggest tech companies who are investing in AI from training its products on user data inside the bloc. This means less innovation, and products that are not as useful inside the EU as they are outside. 

At the same time, Thierry Breton, an EU Commissioner, decided that the major tech challenge in Europe was Elon Musk’s Twitter removing blue ticks from celebrities. Threatening to ban Twitter across the EU has at least seen Monsieur Breton quit his post after being told he would lose it.

These barmy EU priorities are proving another Brexiteer talking point that was called ‘crazy’ at the time: the idea that over time the UK could benefit from diverging from statist EU rules.

The UK Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has recently decided NOT to intervene to prevent user data training AI models in the UK. Partly thanks to the beefed-up guidance on regulators’ duties to promote growth, instituted by the Conservative government back in May, companies like Meta will be able to release and develop exciting new AI products that will benefit users in the UK, but will be absent across the Channel. 

This was such a divergence from the EU that Meta President of Global Affairs and former EU MEP (oh, and former Deputy Prime Minister) Sir Nick Clegg has acknowledged the deep damage the EU is doing to itself here.

Sir Nick is a serious man who has spent enough time amongst the geniuses of Silicon Valley to know which way the world is turning. He will also understand that the UK can be a world leader in these new techs, thanks to its university talent, access to capital markets and the sheer good luck of having Google Deepmind based here.

The potential benefits are enormous, and other countries are already stealing a march. When the UAE appointed a minister for AI in 2017 others laughed at it as a gimmick. They aren’t laughing now as the Gulf state pioneers all manner of new tech. 

There are some great European AI companies, from defence firms like Helsing in Germany to Mistral AI in France who are world-leaders, but they risk being left behind by the American primes because of the EU’s backwards take on regulation.

If you don’t trust politicians not to mess up a bottle of fizzy pop, don’t trust them not to strangle the world-changing, life-saving tech of AI.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com