“哈里斯竞选总统”行动是媒体史上最阴暗的行动之一
Operation 'Harris For President' Is One Of The Shadiest In Media History

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/operation-harris-president-one-shadiest-media-history

简而言之:作者认为,美国总统乔·拜登避免回答有关他的健康状况和提前退出 2024 年总统竞选的决定的棘手问题,引发了人们对他履行总统职责的能力的怀疑。 与此同时,副总统卡马拉·哈里斯(Kamala Harris)尽管是民主党推定候选人,但避免接受采访并明确说明自己的政策和背景。 文章表明,两位领导人都在逃避媒体的审查,而前总统唐纳德·特朗普仍然愿意接受采访,并在最近的露面中面临棘手的问题。 此外,这篇文章还批评媒体未能追究政客的责任,特别是他们的言论前后矛盾,并回避解决移民、治安和枪支管制等有争议的问题。 总体而言,作者呼吁政治家和媒体在报道影响国家的关键话题时采取更加透明的方式。

相关文章

原文

Authored by David Harsanyi via PJMedia.com,

The past month has likely been the most eventful in American political history. Yet the two top officials of the most powerful nation in the world won't answer any genuine questions.

Three weeks have passed since Joe Biden was pushed out of the 2024 presidential race over deteriorating physical and mental abilities, and he has yet to publicly clarify with any specificity why he took this unprecedented step -- or why, if he's incapable of campaigning for the presidency, he's fit to serve out his term in the White House.

Then again, not one journalist in the corporate or legacy media has explained how Biden's obvious senility could turn from a democracy-corroding MAGA misinformation operation into an accepted reality in a single day.

If they were fooled for three years, how can we trust them? If they weren't fooled, and they didn't tell us, how can we trust them?

Well, we can't. Because they're back at it.

The Democrats' new presidential candidate, who has never won a single primary vote, might have been crowned but hasn't given a real interview or even an extemporaneous political statement since Democrat bigwigs pushed Biden aside.

In a functioning liberal "democracy," this would be pretty big news.

The last time the vice president of the United States had a press conference was December 2023. The last time she sat down with any media was June 24, when she was interviewed by the sycophants on MSNBC's "Morning Joe." Before that was the "Momala" Harris interview with Drew Barrymore, which might be the most cringeworthy display of fawning in recorded history.

"What is the incentive for her [to take more questions]?" a person close to Kamala Harris' campaign told Politico recently. "She's getting out exactly the message she wants to get out."

Indeed, it's quite the paradox. The media continue to baby Harris and get her message out to the public, so Harris doesn't feel the least bit of urgency in clarifying her record.

If they were so inclined, the navel-gazing media could probably get Harris out of her shell by doing some honest deep dives into her history and positions. If her lack of transparency were a daily top-of-the-fold story, she would be compelled to speak.

Say what you will about Donald Trump, but he's done scores of interviews and pressers over the past few months, many of them with antagonistic venues -- including taking questions at the National Association of Black Journalists convention just weeks after surviving an assassination attempt.

Harris hasn't spoken to a hostile outlet in years. She won't even take questions from her fans.

Trump's running mate, J.D. Vance, is compelled to answer questions about a throwaway comment he made on a podcast before he was even in the Senate. Harris just sends her minions to walk back major policy positions that would fundamentally affect every American. She staked out these radical positions only a few years earlier while running for the same office. Harris isn't triangulating her views for a general election; she is effectively negating an entire political history through press releases.

Harris, for instance, says she no longer supports banning all air travel, meat and combustible engines. That's nice. Harris says she no longer believes in decriminalizing illegal border crossings. Good. The media treat her new claims as indisputable. No questions asked. No explanations given.

Is Harris still going to try to ban semiautomatic rifles through an executive order? Does she believe all Americans should "end up in the same place" no matter how hard they work? Does she support defunding the police? We have no clue.

Most of the media hackery is driven by partisanship. Some of it is also driven by access. There are practical concerns for journalists. Any reporters who truly challenge Harris are sure to find themselves on the outs. This is why we need a press, not just an outlet, to take their professional responsibility seriously. Because right now, they don't.

Instead, the same people who gaslit the nation, concealing the brittle state of the president for years -- not just an abdication of their profession but of their responsibility as citizens -- are now ensuring that voters won't be subjected to Harris' swirling, mind-bending tautologies and nonsensical stories.

And I'd thank them for it ... if she weren't running for president.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com