为了拯救全球经济,必须摧毁它
It Became Necessary To Destroy The Global Economy To Save It

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/it-became-necessary-destroy-global-economy-save-it

查尔斯·休·史密斯认为,当前的经济和货币政策反映了越南战争时期使用的政策。 与越南不断升级的旨在控制“人心”的军事行动类似,现代政​​策涉及前所未有的央行刺激措施和政府赤字支出,旨在通过“滚雷行动”管理和稳定全球经济。 然而,这些旨在防止经济崩溃的紧急措施已经成为永久性的,并且像任何药物滥用一样,需要增加剂量才能产生预期的效果。 这种对低利率和量化宽松(QE)的依赖,人为地扩大了贫富差距,导致了“一切泡沫”。 随着这些暂时刺激的消退和戒断症状的出现,其破坏性后果可能会导致整个全球金融体系崩溃。 史密斯还指出,尽管美联储提振股市、保护银行和少数富人的努力造成了不平等和附带损害的加剧,但由于廉价资金和量化宽松造成的人为高位,他们仍然没有意识到。 虽然底层 90% 的人在经济上陷入困境,但顶层 10% 的人却继续受益,进一步加剧了贫富差距的扩大。 此外,对短期收益和操纵的重视导致对生产性行业的长期投资和创造就业机会的下降。 从本质上讲,史密斯警告继续沿着这条道路前进的危险,认为金融抑制的临时解决办法会导致意想不到的灾难性后果。

相关文章

原文

Authored by Charles Hugh Smith via OfTwoMinds blog,

As the high generated by the previous iteration of financial repression wears off, the dose increases, as do the stakes when that high wears off.

You've no doubt heard "We had to destroy the village in order to save it." The original quote noted by reporter Peter Arnett in 1968 was "It became necessary to destroy the town to save it." The phrase (whether an exact transcript or not) became emblematic of America's war in Vietnam, encapsulating the impossibility of fighting an unconventional war without front lines for "the hearts and minds" of the citizens with massive firepower.

We find ourselves in a similar situation today as all the immense firepower of central bank stimulus and intervention will be unwound in a chaotically destructive fashion in what I term The Great Unwinding of all the excesses of leverage, debt, stimulus and feverish speculation that now dominate the global financial system and economy.

As in Vietnam, the policies were launched with good intentions: Saving South Vietnam from Communism, the Domino Theory, etc. were the stated goals at the start, just as the goal of all the "emergency measures" pursued by central banks and Treasury departments in 2008-09 was "saving the system from collapse," a possibility succinctly expressed by President Bush at the time: "This sucker's going down."

Just as America's intervention in Vietnam was an "emergency measure" that started out limited and then ballooned into all-out war, the Federal Reserve and other central banks unleashed the financial equivalent of Operation Rolling Thunder while governments cranked up deficit spending, i.e. borrowing and spending trillions to prop up the economy.

The policies that were announced as "emergency measures" quickly became permanent and were expanded as ending the programs would have torpedoed the fragile debt-based asset bubbles being inflated to boost the wealth effect, a metric eerily similar to the Vietnam War's infamous body count, where "winning" morphed into counting the casualties of the "emergency measures."

That the bottom 90% lost ground as the Fed boosted the wealth of the top 10% was another case of destroying the town to save it. Collateral damage is the antiseptic phrase of choice in such cases, and so as the Fed's bubble inflation enriched the already-wealthy--the wealth effect sounds so bubbly and positive, doesn't it?--the real economy became addicted to near-zero-interest debt, extreme leverage and gaming the Fed's expanding interventions: buy the dip, because the Fed will always leap into action to "save" the market.

The problem with interventions and addictions is that it takes ever larger doses to maintain the high. There is no consequence-free intervention or addiction, and so with each new round of stimulus, the economy's dependence on Fed / central bank manipulation--oops, I meant intervention--also expanded.

How the housing sector survived without trillions of dollars in Fed manipulation is a mystery, as the Fed buying trillions of dollars of mortgage-backed securities (MBS) is now the permanent policy, and reversing that "support" would unleash frighteningly uncontrollable market forces.

That's where all this has taken us: the unmanipulated market is now Nemesis. Should the Fed and Treasury loosen their grip and the market wrenches free, then the global financial system and the global economy that now depends on it will both unwind in non-linear, unpredictable ways that will wipe out much of the debt, leverage and phantom wealth of The Everything Bubble.

Lost in all the speculative babble of how to game the Fed's next round of Rolling Thunder is the catastrophic unfairness of the Fed's 15 years of propping up zombies and enriching the already-rich. The bottom 90% who live off their labor have seen their earnings lose purchasing power and assets such as houses soar out of reach, while the Fed and the other central banks have institutionalized moral hazard for the super-wealthy, who can count on the Fed bailing them out while the not-wealthy pay 22% interest on credit cards.

Equally catastrophic is the incentivizing of speculation over productive investment of capital. Yes, we're all fans of reusable rockets and battery factories, but the $100 trillion in "wealth" added since 2009 isn't the result of incredible leaps in productivity; the vast majority of that "wealth" is the result of credit-asset bubbles inflated by the Fed and other central banks.

Meanwhile, the noose of financial repression keeps tightening, as depicted on this chart, courtesy of Richard Bonugli, with whom I discussed The Great Unwinding in a new podcast. (33 min)

As the high generated by the previous iterations of financial repression wears off, the dose increases, as do the stakes when that high wears off. This is how we get to the body count phase, where statistics are issued to "prove we're winning," when in fact the financial sector is increasingly fragile and the economy is increasingly dependent on the next dose of Fed fentanyl.

We're now so high on Fed fentanyl--rate cuts incoming!--that we don't even notice that speculation has replaced productivity growth as the source of "wealth":

Financial Repression is generous with collateral damage. Trillions in Fed fentanyl and federal deficits, and the bottom 50% received a staggeringly large 0.2% boost in their signal-noise share of the nation's financial wealth, all the way up to 2.6%, yowza.

We got your wealth effect right here: lucky you don't actually need wages to live, right? Oh, you do? Well, sorry about that...

Too bad you weren't already wealthy, then the Fed would have made you a lot wealthier.

The unwinding will be uneven, of course, with a great many towns destroyed to save them, and eventually the dominoes falling will reach us, wherever we are. The financial system is tightly bound globally, so as it unwinds it will take down the equally tightly bound global economy.

And so here we are: it became necessary to destroy the global economy to save it. We hope you enjoy the fireworks.

New podcastThe Great Unwinding. (33 min)

*  *  *

Become a $3/month patron of my work via patreon.com.

Subscribe to my Substack for free

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com