城市需要更多树木
Cities Need More Trees

原始链接: https://herman.bearblog.dev/cities-need-more-trees/

约翰内斯堡市中心曾经以其金矿开采业和贫瘠的土地而闻名,但现在发生了转变。 尽管这座城市被称为“eGoli”或“黄金之城”,但由于大规模的岩石开采和随后的处置实践,该市面临着挑战。 结果,产生了大量的岩石废料,导致城市周围形成了巨大的、尘土飞扬的土堆。 这导致了空气污染、热岛和整体不愉快的生活条件。 为了解决这个问题,20 世纪末出现了引入绿化的举措,主要集中在植树上。 到 2024 年,人行道和道路两旁种植了约 120 万棵树,还有数百万人在私人花园中安家落户。 不幸的是,由于历史社会经济因素,分布不均匀。 事实证明,树木除了控制灰尘和减轻城市热岛效应之外还有多种用途。 它们充当隔音屏障,减少环境噪音和轮胎扬起的灰尘量。 此外,它们增强了视觉吸引力,有助于增加生物多样性,为各种物种提供栖息地,促进人类健康和幸福。 总之,城市内绿色空间的实施可以促进改善宜居性、减少排放和持续的生态系统服务。

这些文本讨论了几个位于河流和运河附近的欧洲城市,包括柏林、汉堡、哥本哈根、苏黎世和日内瓦。 然而,它引起了人们对利用水体管理强降雨和干旱周期的有效性的担忧。 这些问题包括水管理系统无法应对突然的强降雨,以及尽管四面环水的树木仍遭受干旱。 因此,需要采取额外的城市规划策略,例如绿色屋顶和当地蓄水,以应对暴雨增多和夏季气温上升的问题。 尽管这些城市面临着挑战,但出于安全原因,仍然需要清除树木。 例如,古老、成熟的榕树对人行道、下水道和架空电线等基础设施构成风险。 作者从洛杉矶沙漠般的环境到绿草如茵的圣巴巴拉,表达了对圣巴巴拉这样的地方的对比感受。 在欣赏自然美景的同时,作者注意到富裕居民与工作社区之间的脱节,导致两个群体之间的社交互动有限。 此外,该地区不利的行人环境使得游客步行探索城镇具有挑战性。 历史记录揭示了 19 世纪末对圣巴巴拉景观的类似观察。 尽管地形看似荒凉,但事实证明,这个地点为生皮生产提供了丰富的资源。 研究表明,森林有助于云的形成和降雨,因此保护森林对于对抗干旱至关重要。 这一观察结果与人们对当今城市环境中极端天气条件管理的担忧是一致的。 城市发展需要考虑各种因素,包括砍伐树木与培育绿地、培育有凝聚力的社区、促进可持续性和确保可达性等选择的生态影响。 让大学、政府和其他组织进一步研究这些方面可能会产生有益于未来城市发展的宝贵见解。
相关文章

原文
Cities need more trees | ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ Herman's blog

I grew up just outside of Johannesburg, which is touted to be "the greenest city in the world". During the summer, when seen from above, it's a verdant, green landscape, with the tops of buildings popping through the canopy.

Joburg trees

Yes, there's a full city beneath those trees.

However, this is not what the land originally looked like.

To cut a long story short, Johannesburg was established following the discovery of gold in 1886. It's known colloquially as eGoli, or "The City of Gold". Gold extraction here is vastly different to other parts of the world. We don't have gold veins running through the rock like in old Western movies. Instead it's mineralised into the rock itself which requires significant processing to extract.

This form of extraction leads to the crushing of millions of tons of rock, which is then dumped creating large, dusty hills around the city. These hills are (especially to the communities surrounding them) toxic and radioactive, and when the wind picks up yellow dust clouds used to envelop the city.

One of the proposed solutions to suppressing this omnipresent dust was the planting of trees (1.2 millions as of 2024) on sidewalks and pavement, and millions more planted privately in back-yards and plots. Due to Apartheid in South Africa, which economically and socially disadvantaged the majority of the population based on race, these planting efforts were not equitably distributed. You can still see a stark difference between rich and poor neighbourhoods to this day based purely on tree cover.

But I'm not here to talk about the socioeconomic problems facing South Africa. Instead I'd like to focus on how the planting of so many trees affected the city itself.

Since these trees were originally planted to manage dust, they are generally big and leafy. This has the benefit of creating a lot of shade throughout the city, mitigating a lot of the "heat island" effect which is pervasive in any city since asphalt and concrete are great at absorbing visible spectrum light and radiating it as heat. Walking down a shady street on a hot summer day is such a pleasant experience when compared to being out in the blistering sun.

Trees are not just great dust sinks and heat shields, but great sound barriers as well. Having tree lined streets not only reduces the noise of traffic (and the dust kicked up from their tyres), but also protects pedestrians and infrastructure on the sidewalks from stray vehicles.

On top of that it just looks better. I'm certain humans have genetic biophilia, which is why we love being in nature or taking walks in the forest. Having trees around us, teeming with birds and other life just feels good. Speaking of birds, trees increase the biodiversity of insects and other small critters in urban environments. It also gives birds a safe-haven from the deadliest hunter of all: the humble house cat.

I've been to many cities, all over the world. Some that do trees well, and others that fail miserably. And I'm always shocked at the contrast. Given two cities with a similar climate, I'm significantly more likely to do things like walk to a local coffee shop and browse corner stores, or sit on a park bench. But only if the walk is pleasant and shady.

Planting trees as a form of environmentalism or carbon capture is generally a hit-or-miss strategy. The vast majority of planted trees never reach maturity, and depending on where the trees are planted it could have a net heating instead of a net cooling effect due to the change in the environment's albedo. However, planting trees in cities is pretty much all upside with almost no downside (except that birds tend to shit on my car).

Dead car

So the next time you're enjoying a walk down a lovely shady street, take a look up and appreciate the trees.


联系我们 contact @ memedata.com