只有28%的公众对高等教育“高度信心”; 新的民意调查结果
Only 28% Of The Public Has "High Confidence" In Higher Education; New Poll Finds

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/personal-finance/only-28-public-has-high-confidence-higher-education-new-poll-finds

乔纳森·特利 (Jonathan Turley) 的文章揭示了芝加哥大学 NORC 进行的一项新调查,该调查由个人权利与自由基金会资助。 这表明只有28%的美国人对美国大学表示高度信任。 共和党人 (12%) 和独立人士 (28%) 的信任度进一步下降。 尽管信任度较低,学者们仍继续毫无挑战地传播意识形态观点,主导出版物、奖项和协会。 然而,这些学校通过校友捐赠和公共资助维持财务稳定。 与此同时,由于兴趣下降和对压制个人信仰的恐惧增加,申请的学生越来越少。 媒体面临着类似的情况,受众和收入不断减少,但变革的阻力依然存在。 例如,《华盛顿邮报》的新任领导人弗雷德·瑞安(Fred Ryan)坦率地解决了这个问题,引发了员工的强烈反对,导致读者和金钱的损失。 最终,大学和新闻媒体都面临着维持公众信任的重大挑战,同时继续以不可持续的财务方式运营。 这些机构的重要性值得紧急关注和改革。

相关文章

原文

Authored by Jonathan Turley,

A new poll conducted by NORC at the University of Chicago (commissioned by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression) shows that only 28% of Americans have a lot of trust in higher education. Academia has continued to alienate much of the country as an orthodox echo chamber. As with media outlets, the result has been falling interest and trust in these institutions.The poll asked “How much confidence, if any, do you have in U.S. colleges and universities?”

Only 28% said they had a “great deal of confidence in colleges and universities.”

Not surprisingly, given the ideological balance at most schools, the highest levels of trust came from Democrats and liberals. However, even this group only showed a 40% high confidence rate. Among Republicans, it drops to 12% and among independents it drops to 28%.

For most businesses, such negative reactions would be viewed as catastrophic. For academia, it will not matter a whit.

It is still personally beneficial for professors and administrators to push ideological agendas and maintain the lack of intellectual diversity on campuses. These professors are not challenged in their writings or their statements. They dominate publications, awards, and associations. In the meantime, these schools still receive sufficient support from alumni and, in the case of public universities, public funding.

This could not come at a worse time as many decide that college is simply not worth the money. At the same time, falling birthrates are impacting dropping applications. Others have little interest in going to institutions where they must hide their political viewpoints or values.

We have seen the same phenomenon in the media where media outlets are collapsing in viewership or readership but reporters are resisting every effort to return to a more neutral and objective basis for coverage. Recently, the Washington Post’s new publisher and CEO William Lewis dropped a truth bomb on his writers by telling them “Let’s not sugarcoat it…We are losing large amounts of money. Your audience has halved in recent years. People are not reading your stuff. Right. I can’t sugarcoat it anymore.”

The response from the media has been a campaign against Lewis and another editor tasked with saving the newspaper from itself. The New York Times, National Public Radio, and other outlets have piled on Lewis with a series of attack pieces. This is being actively and openly supported by reporters at the Post and could well work in pressuring owner Jeff Bezos. The result will be to stay the course of plunging trust and readership at a paper that is hemorrhaging money and readers.

We need great universities and great newspapers as a nation. We need Princeton and the Post. That is why this trend is so alarming. These are hardened silos that seem impenetrable to efforts to restore trust in their product.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com