研究发现美国农药产品中485种化学物质与乳腺癌有关
Research finds 485 chemicals in US pesticide products linked to breast cancer

原始链接: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/sep/26/breast-cancer-us-pesticide-products

发表在《环境健康展望》上的一项最新研究指出,美国农药中使用的 485 种化学物质与乳腺癌存在关联。这些化学物质常见于农作物喷洒剂、草坪肥料以及虱子治疗剂等日常消费品中。 公共卫生倡导者警告称,美国环保署(EPA)目前的监管力度严重不足。该机构未能评估化学混合物的累积影响,且往往豁免对所谓“惰性”成分的严格安全性审查,而这些成分实际上并非生物惰性,甚至可能具有剧毒。此外,批评人士指出,化学工业与环保署之间的“旋转门”现象导致了监管松懈;许多化学物质因对激素干扰剂量反应的错误解读而被忽视。 随着早发性乳腺癌发病率的上升,研究人员呼吁加强监管,例如强制执行更严格的标签规定。在联邦政府未采取行动的情况下,专家建议通过以下方式降低个人接触风险:选择有机农产品,参考高风险蔬果农药残留指南,以及使用高质量的净水系统(如反渗透或活性炭过滤)来减少化学物质的摄入。

最近的一项研究指出,美国农药中含有 485 种化学物质“与”乳腺癌有关,这一发现引发了 Hacker News 上的激烈讨论。 批评者认为该研究存在缺陷,指出其缺乏原创性研究,而是依赖于“文献挖掘”——即将那些在啮齿动物身上通过高剂量、非现实剂量发现癌症关联的研究进行汇总。怀疑论者指出,这种方法缺乏严格的同行评审,往往混淆相关性与因果关系,并且所依赖的动物模型在转化为人类生理学方面效果不佳。他们认为,“与……有关”一词常被用作伪科学的流行语,在缺乏有力证据的情况下可能会引起公众恐慌。 相反,一些评论者主张采取“预防原则”,认为在缺乏绝对确定性的情况下,安全性的举证责任应由将化学物质引入环境的一方承担。他们建议,考虑到癌症发病率的上升,即使证据尚处于初步阶段,出于公共卫生考虑而谨慎行事也是合理的做法。归根结底,这场讨论突显了在面对环境健康担忧时,对严格、高质量科学标准的要求与对主动监管的渴望之间存在的张力。
相关文章

原文

New research has identified at least 485 chemicals used in US pesticide products that are linked to breast cancer, raising questions about the safety of food and other products at a time when early onset breast cancer rates are surging worldwide.

The new peer-reviewed paper, published in Environmental Health Perspectives, a top journal from the American Chemical Society, highlights what public health advocates say are a range of deficiencies in how US pesticides are regulated. The review includes active pesticide ingredients, but also hundreds of so-called “inert”, or inactive, ingredients that typically do not undergo a thorough safety review.

The Environmental Protection Agency only considers each pesticide ingredient’s individual health risks, and does not consider the entire pesticide formula, or exposure to multiple pesticides. The chemicals are not just found in pesticides used on crops, but also in lice treatments applied to children’s scalps, home lawn fertilizers, and flea and tick treatments.

“Adding these exposures up gets pretty consequential and concerning,” said Jenny Kay, a report co-author with the Silent Spring Institute non-profit. “We wanted to bring more attention to the pesticides in different products.”

Beside skin cancers, breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in the US. Incidence rates for breast cancer have notably increased by 1% per year, according to the American Cancer Society, and that rise has actually been slightly faster in women younger than 50 (1.4%).

Pesticide use has also increased in recent years, as federal health data via the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) shows 84 of these specific breast cancer-linked chemicals are present in the general population. But that number, scientists say, is an undercount because it does not track most of the compounds the Silent Spring Institute identified.

The pesticide review is part of a broader systematic effort by the institute to identify where in the economy, and across everyday life, people are exposed to breast cancer-linked chemicals. It identified about 500 in common consumer goods, and 462 in drinking water.

Only about 145 of the pesticide chemicals identified were registered with the EPA as active ingredients, meaning that the chemical industry is either using the inert status to avoid health scrutiny, or exploiting other loopholes.

Inactive, or inert, ingredients are usually added as surfactants or penetrating agents that help disperse the active ingredients or make them more absorbable. About 4,000 inert ingredients are approved for use by the EPA, among them Pfas “forever chemicals”. They are often added to make the pesticide more toxic to a living organism.

“They are not biologically inert, they are just called inert because they do not target the pest,” Kay said. In other words, the body does not distinguish between inert and active ingredients, and inactive substances are no less of a danger to human health.

“It is a regulatory blind spot,” Kay said. The EPA in 2023 rejected a legal petition to start more stringently reviewing inert ingredients.

Kay said another problem lies in hormone-disrupting chemicals causing disease at lower levels of exposure, but not higher. This “non-monotonic dose response” has led the EPA to dismiss some chemicals’ risks, and ignore that they can cause cancer at low levels.

The top officials in the EPA’s pesticide and chemical safety offices are former industry lobbyists. The pesticide office in particular has been viewed as being heavily infiltrated by industry, and subjected to its influence.

“I’m not in the head of EPA scientists, but I do worry a lot about industry pressure and the revolving door between EPA and industry employees because all of that factors into the way the EPA considers and regulates chemicals,” Kay said.

The Silent Spring Institute called for an expansion of California’s Proposition 65, which requires warnings for chemicals known to cause cancer or reproductive harm. The study identified 16 pesticides that are not listed under Prop 65, and the authors say adding these chemicals could discourage companies from using them.

People can protect themselves by buying organic produce, or products that have not been treated with pesticides, as much as possible. If that’s not possible, Consumer Reports has an easy-to-use guide on which fruits and vegetables typically have the highest levels of pesticide residues on them. Among those are blueberries, watermelon, kale and green beans.

A recent report found about 25% of the nation’s water intake and around 675,000 wells draw water contaminated with dangerous levels of atrazine, a hormone disrupting chemical linked to breast cancer. Water-filtration systems can filter pesticides from water, and though no system is perfect, activated carbon and reverse osmosis generally do the best job.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com