陪审团裁定 Facebook 在剑桥分析事件中欺骗用户,需承担法律责任
Jury finds Facebook liable for deceiving users in Cambridge Analytica case

原始链接: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/facebook-liable-deceiving-users-cambridge-analytica/

新墨西哥州陪审团裁定,Facebook(Meta)在隐私保护方面误导用户,需承担法律责任。此案主要涉及“剑桥分析”丑闻,当时约 8700 万个个人资料的数据被非法收集并用于政治精准投放。陪审团认为,该公司未能保护用户数据,影响了新墨西哥州超过 200 万的全体民众。 此前,该案经过了为期两周的审理。检方成功指出,该平台在数据泄露事件以及随后针对数据经纪人的调查中误导了公众。由于该公司被认定存在超过 200 万次违规行为,法官将裁定最终罚款金额,州政府寻求每项违规处以最高 5000 美元的罚款。 Meta 表示将提出上诉,理由是援引宪法第一修正案权利,并称州政府提供的证据已过时。这一裁决对新墨西哥州而言是一次重大胜利,在其他各州达成广泛和解协议后,该州坚持独立推进此案。今年早些时候,该州还获得了另一项重大法律胜利,当时 Meta 因其平台上的儿童安全保护问题被判处近 10 亿美元罚款。总检察长劳尔·托雷斯(Raúl Torrez)称赞该裁决是追究大型科技公司责任的历史性一步。

新墨西哥州陪审团裁定 Meta(Facebook)在剑桥分析公司丑闻中欺骗用户罪名成立。由于其他大多数州此前已达成和解,这次裁决标志着一次罕见的法律胜利。 Hacker News 上的讨论反映了人们对于企业监管有效性的严重分歧。该裁决的批评者认为,此类法律行动往往只是走过场,和解金被视为“经营成本”而非有效的威慑手段。许多用户表示,与 Meta 的营收相比,罚款微不足道;且诉讼过程过于缓慢,以至于判决下达时已显得意义不大。 相反,一些评论者认为,各州在此案中的法律工作建立了一套宝贵的“法律先例”,可供数千起针对 Meta 的私人诉讼的原告利用。辩论还触及了监管机构与科技公司之间的“旋转门”现象,许多参与者对现有体系是否能够真正追究大型企业责任持怀疑态度。另有一些人则对剑桥分析公司丑闻本身提出质疑,怀疑该公司的数据收集手段对政治结果的影响是否如外界所描述的那样严重。
相关文章

原文

A New Mexico jury on Friday found Facebook liable for deceiving users about privacy protections on the social media platform.

It is now up to the judge to determine how much the company would pay, with attorneys representing the state asking for the maximum $5,000 penalty per violation.

The two-week trial in Santa Fe centered on accusations that Facebook deceived users about a data breach stemming from a third-party personality quiz that harvested data from roughly 87 million profiles and sold it to a political consulting firm, Cambridge Analytica, to generate targeted ads. The now-defunct firm's clients included the 2016 campaign for President Trump. 

Jurors sided with prosecutors, finding Facebook's failure to protect users' data impacted New Mexico's entire population of more than 2 million people. 

"For years, Facebook operated as if the rules that apply to everyone else didn't apply to them. Today, a jury of New Mexicans said otherwise," New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez said in a statement. "This is a historic verdict, not just for New Mexico, but for every state fighting to hold Big Tech accountable."

Jurors also found Facebook misled the public about investigations into data brokers following the Cambridge Analytica scandal, finding the company liable for over 2 million violations. 

During closing arguments, lawyers for Facebook claimed the state's evidence was outdated and that despite having five years to gather material, New Mexico failed to find more than one other instance of a data breach.

A Meta spokesperson told CBS News the company disagreed with the jury's verdict and will continue to defend "against efforts to distort our records." The company also noted that free speech issues "featured very prominently" in the case. 

"We have a First Amendment right to manage those platforms in a way we believe best serves the interests of our community," the spokesperson said. "This means prioritizing free speech, protecting our users' information and giving them control over their data." 

Meta agreed in August to pay up to $18 billion to settle the multistate lawsuit surrounding child safety issues. Buried in the 130-page settlement was an agreement to release Meta from future liability related to the Cambridge Analytica privacy breach, making New Mexico the only state to pursue a case. Florida was the only other state that did not sign the settlement, saying it was not tough enough on Meta.

Also this year, New Mexico won judgments totaling $942 million from Meta in a two-phase trial about the company's safety protections for minors. Furthermore, the court ordered Meta to implement new safeguards, including age-verification technology and time limits on its platforms. 

"Let this be a warning to every technology company doing business in our state," Torrez said Friday. "If you lie to New Mexicans about how you use their data, we will find out, and we will hold you accountable."

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com