Authored by Micaiah Bilger via The College Fix,
Among the many woke winners of this year's prestigious National Book Awards is a black Columbia University professor whose screed attacks "white paint" as racist.
Professor Wendy Walters' new book, "A Dead White: An Argument Against White Paint," claims that white paint is not the "neutral" architectural design element that it initially appears to be.
Instead, she "interrogates all that we have taken for granted about the substance that colors, or fails to color, the structures and objects that surround us - and what the collective impulse toward white paint can tell us about culture, politics, and individual desire," the publisher's description states, in part.
The idea for the book originated with the Ivy League professor's "genuine and visceral dislike of white paint - a feeling that is at times overwhelming," she explained in a 2021 video for Creative Capital Foundation on YouTube.
But Walters pushed back on the idea that her emotional response is "possibly irrational."
"As I tried to understand why my response to white paint was so strong, I discovered numerous examples of the way that it figured into systems of erasure, exclusion, violence, and the masking of power in the social and natural world," she said in the video.
Most of the examples she gave linked white paint to racism.
In one, white supremacists splattered white paint outside the Rothko Chapel in Houston, Texas in 2018, and, in another, white paint was used to vandalize a 100th anniversary memorial gallery to the Tulsa race massacre in 2021.
She also mentioned a rainbow crosswalk for "LGBTQIA+ persons" in New Brunswick, Canada being painted over with white paint in an "act of intolerance."
"I hope to encourage the reader to think about how practices of decoration and adornment might allude to hidden narratives of power, whether or not they recognize them as being so," she said in the video.
The publisher's description of her work does not mention racism or white supremacy, and the book isn't scheduled for release until October.
However, in the 2021 video, Walters linked the book to her past writings about racism. According to her university bio, she "writes regularly about visual culture, political geographies, climate, and race and identity."
"A Dead White" is not the first to link white paint to racism, though.
Three years ago, Norway's University of Bergen received a $1.2 million government grant to explore how white paint has contributed to white supremacy around the world, The College Fix reported at the time.
The "NorWhite" study focuses on whether the Norwegian-developed paint pigment titanium dioxide white helped advance white "as a superior color," Fox News reported.
Why such projects are deemed worthy of awards has a lot to do with the left's capture of the arts and academia. As New York Times columnist Bret Stephens wrote on Tuesday: "Bluntly, the National Book Award has become a D.E.I. checklist: Only authors with preferred identities, preferred topics and preferred politics stand any realistic chance of winning."
Stephens mentioned Walters' book as one example. Other winners, announced last week, include books about "queer" parenting and "Islamophobia in America."
The problem is not that moderates or right-leaning authors are no good. The problem is that they are being shut out and a broad range of topics and ideas are being ignored.
Maybe Walters is a good writer. Maybe not. Her book isn't available to the public yet. But this "everything is racist" bent is getting old and boring. Frankly, it's lazy, too.
Pick something, anything: clean pantries, clowns, Mozart, capitalism, mathematics, milk, Taylor Swift (these are already taken, by the way). Then, argue that it's racist, smatter in a few "lived experiences" and - voila! - book deals and major prizes. Repeat. Again, and again, and again.
And they wonder why so many Americans have developed a distaste for academia.