不要用 AI 写作
Don't Use AI to Write

原始链接: https://paulbakker.io/writing/no-ai-for-writing/

虽然人工智能是研究、数据分析和编程的强大工具,但作者认为,永远不应让它代你写作。写作从根本上是一个深度思考的过程;将写作外包给人工智能,实际上绕过了理清思路和解决复杂问题所需的认知工作。 写作的生产力不在于数量或速度,而在于你见解的影响力。一份简练、深刻的文件,远比一份冗长且充斥着废话的人工智能生成的报告更有价值。 作者建议采取一种平衡的方法:在动笔*之前*,利用人工智能收集信息、整理数据或识别规律。在完成初稿后,将人工智能作为陪练——通过提问来发现思维盲点或梳理核心要点——而不是让它来重写或润色你的文字。归根结底,人工智能应作为反馈和准备的工具,但沟通的核心必须始终是你个人批判性思维的产物。

这场 Hacker News 讨论聚焦于在写作过程中使用人工智能的伦理与成效。参与者的共识是:**写作是思考的一种基本形式**,将撰写文稿的工作委托给人工智能,可能会产出缺乏作者独特声音和意图的空洞、衍生性或“垃圾”内容。 此次辩论的主要观点包括: * **“起草”的底线:** 大多数参与者认为,不应使用人工智能来起草旨在代表个人声音的原创文本。这种做法被视为不诚实,且放弃了赋予写作价值的认知工作。 * **人工智能的合理使用:** 人工智能在“低阶”任务中被广泛接受,例如校对、修正语法,或作为测试论点严谨性的对抗工具。 * **编程的相似性:** 讨论延伸到了软件开发领域,许多人认为“直觉编程”(即完全依赖人工智能编写所有代码)同样有害,因为它剥夺了开发者对深层逻辑的理解和解决问题的能力。 * **结论:** 社区建议,虽然人工智能可以作为头脑风暴或优化机制的有用工具,但组织思想和构建论点等“重活”必须由人类承担,以保持作品的完整性。
相关文章

原文
Articles

Writing requires thinking, don't let an AI do the thinking for you.

AI

Tools like Claude, Codex/ChatGPT and Gemini are great. I use them all day (both at work and personally) for coding, research, digging through data, collecting information etc. But what I don’t use them for is writing, and I strongly suggest you do the same.

Don’t skip the thinking!

Writing forces you to deeply think about the problem you’re solving, and what you’re trying to communicate to your readers. This is why writing is hard, but also why writing is such a useful tool to help you think. If you generate a document based on some bullet points, or whatever the source is, you’re skipping the thinking step. The result probably looks “pretty good”, and you’re likely going to accept it with some minor tweaks. But did you think deeply about the problem? Does the document really reflect the most important things you wanted to communicate? Probably not. But you’ll never know, because you skipped the thinking step.

The issue is not that AI tools are bad at writing (to the contrary), they’re just bad at thinking and coming up with new ideas. And that’s exactly where you come in!

If you’re worried that this will slow you down, ask yourself what your added value is if you’re just prompting an AI to do the thinking for you. Productivity in writing isn’t about producing the most content in the shortest amount of time, just like programming is not about producing the most lines of code. It’s about the ideas you bring, and the impact those ideas have on your team, company or others around you. Does it help your company more to have a 60-page strategy document full of fluff that never gets to the core of what problem you’re solving, or would a 3-page, very well thought through strategy be better?

So no AI to help with documents at all!?

It’s not about being dogmatic. Prevent replacing your own thinking with an AI’s “thinking”, but use tools where they actually bring value.

Once my initial writing (and thinking) is done, I actually do use AI to further improve a document. I’ll use prompts like “Read this doc, what questions would you have?”, or “what is the most important take away in this doc?”. This is similar to asking someone to proofread before you publish. Try to refrain from asking an agent to make fixes or improvements; just ask it questions. Based on the feedback you get back, you’re back in thinking mode how to best address the feedback. Just like you would ask a co-worker for feedback on something you wrote, but you wouldn’t ask a co-worker to “write a document based on these 5 bullet points”.

AI tools are also very useful while preparing to write. Sifting through data, structuring data, finding patterns, etc., are all things that can be done faster, and better, with the use of AI. It can help you better understand a problem, before thinking about solutions for that problem.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com