斯托尔曼:数千人死亡,数百万人失去自由(2001年)
Stallman: Thousands Dead, Millions Deprived of Liberties (2001)

原始链接: https://news.slashdot.org/story/01/09/17/1758231/stallman-thousands-dead-millions-deprived-of-liberties

在这篇文章中,理查德·斯托曼(Richard Stallman)警告称,美国政府对“9·11”恐怖袭击的反应有可能会对国家的核心价值观造成“次生损害”。斯托曼承认机场安检等基本安全措施是必要的权宜之计,但他强烈反对扩大化的大规模监控。 他特别批评了推广面部识别技术的提议,指出其潜在的无效性,并指责相关机构利用时机推动加强监控。此外,他对政府强制要求在加密软件中设置“后门”的行为表示担忧,认为这会破坏个人隐私。斯托曼还告诫人们,若在缺乏适当立法审查的情况下赋予行政部门无限的军事权力,将重蹈历史上权力不受制约所带来的危险。最终,他呼吁公众保持警惕,敦促民选官员保护公民自由,并指出以安全之名牺牲自由,实际上等同于让恐怖分子达到了破坏美国民主的目的。

对不起。
相关文章

原文

Hobart noted that Richard Stallman has written a very well said piece on the civil liberties that we will no doubt be deprived of following the recent terrorist attacks on the US. I know RMS takes a lot of heat for being out there sometimes, but this is a really well said bit and worth a read.

By Richard Stallman

The worst damage from many nerve injuries is secondary -- it happens in the hours after the initial trauma, as the body's reaction to the damage kills more nerve cells. Researchers are beginning to discover ways to prevent this secondary damage and reduce the eventual harm.

If we are not careful, the deadly attacks on New York and Washington will lead to far worse secondary damage, if the U.S. Congress adopts "preventive measures" that take away the freedom that America stands for.

I'm not talking about searches at airports here. Searches of people or baggage for weapons, as long as they check only for weapons and keep no records about you if you have no weapons, are just an inconvenience; they do not endanger civil liberties. What I am worried about is massive surveillance of all aspects of life: of our phone calls, of our email, and of our physical movements.

These measures are likely to be recommended regardless of whether they would be effective for their stated purpose. An executive of a company developing face recognition software is said to be telling reporters that widespread deployment of face-recognizing computerized cameras would have prevented the attacks. The September 15 New York Times cites a congressman who is advocating this "solution." Given that the human face recognition performed by the check-in agents did not keep the hijackers out, there is no reason to think that computer face recognition would help. But that won't stop the agencies that have always wanted to do more surveillance from pushing this plan now, and many other plans like it. To stop them will require public opposition.

Even more ominously, a proposal to require government back doors in encryption software has already appeared.

Meanwhile, Congress hurried to pass a resolution giving Bush unlimited power to use military force in retaliation for the attacks. Retaliation may be justified, if the perpetrators can be identified and carefully targeted, but Congress has a duty to scrutinize specific measures as they are proposed. Handing the president carte blanche in a moment of anger is exactly the mistake that led the United States into the Vietnam War.

Please let your elected representatives, and your unelected president, know that you don't want your civil liberties to become the terrorists' next victim. Don't wait -- the bills are already being written.


Copyright 2001 Richard Stallman

Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article are permitted in any medium provided the copyright notice and this notice are preserved.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com