我们管理和对待马匹的方式塑造了它们的个性。
How we manage and engage with our horses shapes their personality

原始链接: https://www.utu.fi/en/news/press-release/how-we-manage-and-engage-with-our-horses-shapes-their-personality

图尔库大学与瑞典农业科学大学最近的一项研究表明,马匹的个性很大程度上受人类提供的环境和关系影响。研究人员分析了超过 2700 匹马的数据,确定了四个个性维度:人类社交性、注意力、神经质和马匹社交性。 虽然年龄、品种和性别等内在因素起着基础性作用,但管理决策同样具有影响力。研究发现,长期稳定的饲养以及规律、非高要求的“高质量陪伴”能提高马匹对人类的社交性。同样,频繁骑乘与更高的注意力和更低的神经质相关,这可能是由于习惯化所致。相反,社交孤立会显著阻碍马匹与其他马匹互动,这突显了群体饲养对于行为发展的重要性。 尽管该研究属于横断面研究,无法证实直接的因果关系,但它表明人类管理的环环境直接影响马匹的性格。首席研究员奥塞安·利尔曼(Océane Liehrmann)强调,通过培养稳定的关系和社交生活条件,马主可以积极影响马匹的个性发展,从而提升它们的福利及其与人类进行有效互动的能力。

一项近期的研究指出,马匹的性格不仅由基因或品种决定,很大程度上还受其生活环境、照料方式以及与人类关系质量的影响。 Hacker News 上的评论者大多对此表示并不意外,并指出马是高度聪明的哺乳动物,具备复杂的沟通能力。经验丰富的马主强调,成功的互动建立在尊重马匹社交礼仪的基础上——例如进行眼神交流并等待对方发出接近的邀请——而非强行介入。如果人类忽视这些信号(例如为了拍照而从背后接近),可能会导致安全问题和沟通误解。 讨论中还强调,长期饲养马匹的主人会与动物发展出一套“专属语言”,其特征是微妙的肢体语言和相互形成的日常惯例。尽管正式研究证实了这些发现,但许多人认为,对于任何与动物建立长期联系的人来说,这都是常识。总而言之,人们达成的共识是:就像狗或人类一样,马的行为深受其人生经历这一“训练数据”以及照料者对待方式的影响。
相关文章

原文

Horse personality has long been known to influence welfare, training outcomes, and the quality of human–horse interactions. While genetic and biological factors clearly play a role, far less has been known about how the human-shaped environment may contribute to building horse personality.

"Personality is not something that develops independently of its surroundings. Horses live in environments we create and relationships we build for them, and our results show that these matter," says lead author of the study, Postdoctoral Researcher Océane Liehrmann from the University of Turku, Finland, and the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.

The research group conducted an international online survey during 2023–2024, gathering responses from 2,257 horse owners of about 2,767 horses across Europe, North America, and beyond. Owners rated their horses' personalities using a 52-item questionnaire and provided detailed information about housing conditions, riding and groundwork frequency, quality time with their horses, headgear use, ownership history, and relationship duration.

Four windows into horse personality

Statistical analyses of the data revealed four distinct personality dimensions: 

 
  • Human Sociability: tendency to seek and enjoy interaction with people
  • Attentiveness: capacity to focus on and cooperate with human cues
  • Neuroticism: emotional reactivity and sensitivity to stress
  • Horse Sociability: tendency to engage in affiliative, non-aggressive interactions with other horses
 

As expected, intrinsic factors such as age, sex, and breed were among the strongest drivers of personality scores. Warmbloods, for example, scored highest in Neuroticism, while draft horses scored lowest. Geldings consistently scored higher than mares in both Human Sociability and Attentiveness.

Depth of the human–horse bond and riding frequency matter

The length and stability of the relationship were linked to Human Sociability: horses with the same owner for over ten years scored about 12 percent higher than those together less than a year, while horses that had passed through multiple owners scored lower than those bought directly from a breeder.

"These patterns suggest that familiarity and relational continuity contribute to how openly and comfortably horses engage with people. Frequent changes of owner or stable may leave a lasting mark on a horse's willingness to seek human contact," explains Liehrmann.

Owners who often spent unstructured time with their horses, being present, offering scratches, and not demanding anything from them, had horses that scored higher on Human Sociability. Riding frequency, then again, was tied to calmness: horses ridden 4–7 times a week scored higher on Attentiveness and lower on Neuroticism, while rarely ridden horses scored higher on Neuroticism. This possibly reflects habituation from regular training, or that calmer horses are simply chosen for regular use.

Solitary housing, fewer social skills

One of the clearest findings concerned Horse Sociability: horses housed alone consistently scored lower than those living with other horses, regardless of whether they lived in pairs or full herds. 

This finding raises important welfare considerations. Horses housed alone may score lower because social isolation limits the expression of affiliative behaviour. It may also be that horses perceived as socially unfit are kept in isolation. In either case, the results point to social housing as an important consideration for both welfare and behavioural development.

Implications for horse welfare and management

The researchers emphasise that the study is cross-sectional and does not establish causation, and that the associations identified are modest. Longitudinal studies are needed to clarify whether management decisions shape personality, personality shapes management decisions, or both.

However, the findings show that housing conditions, the frequency and quality of human interactions, and the stability of the ownership history are all associated with measurable differences in personality profiles.

"Understanding how management and relationship factors interact with personality has direct implications for horse welfare. If we design environments that allow horses to develop socially, maintain stable relationships, and enjoy positive interactions with humans, we may be doing more than making horses easier to handle, we may help them develop their personality in a more positive way," concludes Liehrmann.

The study was published in the journal Royal Society Open Science.

Photo: Star, the author's horse, scored very high in human sociability. Photographer: Océane Liehrmann

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com