《威利狼大战阿克米公司》(1990年)
Coyote v. Acme (1990)

原始链接: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1990/02/26/coyote-v-acme

郊狼先生正寻求法律途径,起诉Acme公司长期提供缺陷、危险且不可靠的产品。尽管郊狼先生经过精心策划,但Acme的商品——从喷气动力溜冰鞋、弹簧鞋到各类爆炸物——却屡屡失灵,导致他遭受严重的人身伤害及羞辱。 该文件指出,Acme在销售高功率、危险设备时,既未提供足够的安全警示,也缺乏有效的功能质量控制。具体事件包括: * **火箭溜冰鞋:** 因缺乏必要的安全功能而无法控制,导致多次剧烈碰撞。 * **爆炸物:** 频繁发生故障,经常提前引爆并造成严重的人身伤害,包括皮毛烧焦、骨折及面部毁容。 * **弹簧动力鞋:** 发生灾难性的结构性损坏,使产品破碎得无法辨认。 郊狼先生认为,这些事件并非偶然事故,而是由于Acme在提供功能完备、安全且设计合理的产品方面存在系统性失职。他指出,每一次购买都以失败告终,这证明Acme的产品目录始终严重危害消费者安全。

Hacker News 社区最近讨论了电影《歪心狼对ACME》(Coyote vs. Acme)。这部真人与动画结合的影片改编自 1990 年《纽约客》的一篇文章。讨论显示观众的评价存在巨大分歧:许多观众认为该片出人意料地有趣、充满怀旧感且构思巧妙;而另一部分观众则觉得它平庸、重复,顶多算“中规中矩”。 尽管评价褒贬不一,但讨论中反复出现的一个主题是该片出乎意料的情感共鸣,以及它作为一部“爆米花电影”超出了人们的低预期。许多评论者指出,即使是不熟悉经典《乐一通》动画的孩子也能轻松看懂。此外,鉴于该片在发行过程中曾经历广为人知的制片厂博弈,不少人还赞赏了电影本身所呈现的“企业抗争”剧情所带来的讽刺意味。 除电影本身外,讨论还涉及了更广泛的话题,包括由于过度广告导致的现代观影体验下滑、《乐一通》角色作为文化符号的持久影响力,以及该片与《谁陷害了兔子罗杰》等同类标杆作品相比的质量之争。总体而言,用户一致认为,虽然这部电影或许不算具有开创性,但它作为一部诚意满满的娱乐作品,其魅力让许多人感到惊喜。
相关文章

原文

Hampered by these injuries, Mr. Coyote was nevertheless obliged to support himself. With this in mind, he purchased of Defendant as an aid to mobility one pair of Acme Rocket Skates. When he attempted to use this product, however, he became involved in an accident remarkably similar to that which occurred with the Rocket Sled. Again, Defendant sold over the counter, without caveat, a product which attached powerful jet engines (in this case, two) to inadequate vehicles, with little or no provision for passenger safety. Encumbered by his heavy casts, Mr. Coyote lost control of the Rocket Skates soon after strapping them on, and collided with a roadside billboard so violently as to leave a hole in the shape of his full silhouette.

Mr. Coyote states that on occasions too numerous to list in this document he has suffered mishaps with explosives purchased of Defendant: the Acme “Little Giant” Firecracker, the Acme Self-Guided Aerial Bomb, etc. (For a full listing, see the Acme Mail Order Explosives Catalogue and attached deposition, entered in evidence as Exhibit C.) Indeed, it is safe to say that not once has an explosive purchased of Defendant by Mr. Coyote performed in an expected manner. To cite just one example: At the expense of much time and personal effort, Mr. Coyote constructed around the outer rim of a butte a wooden trough beginning at the top of the butte and spiralling downward around it to some few feet above a black X painted on the desert floor. The trough was designed in such a way that a spherical explosive of the type sold by Defendant would roll easily and swiftly down to the point of detonation indicated by the X. Mr. Coyote placed a generous pile of birdseed directly on the X, and then, carrying the spherical Acme Bomb (Catalogue # 78-832), climbed to the top of the butte. Mr. Coyote’s prey, seeing the birdseed, approached, and Mr. Coyote proceeded to light the fuse. In an instant, the fuse burned down to the stem, causing the bomb to detonate.

In addition to reducing all Mr. Coyote’s careful preparations to naught, the premature detonation of Defendant’s product resulted in the following disfigurements to Mr. Coyote:

1. Severe singeing of the hair on the head, neck, and muzzle.

2. Sooty discoloration.

3. Fracture of the left ear at the stem, causing the ear to dangle in the aftershock with a creaking noise.

4. Full or partial combustion of whiskers, producing kinking, frazzling, and ashy disintegration.

5. Radical widening of the eyes, due to brow and lid charring.

We come now to the Acme Spring-Powered Shoes. The remains of a pair of these purchased by Mr. Coyote on June 23rd are Plaintiff’s Exhibit D. Selected fragments have been shipped to the metallurgical laboratories of the University of California at Santa Barbara for analysis, but to date no explanation has been found for this product’s sudden and extreme malfunction. As advertised by Defendant, this product is simplicity itself: two wood-and-metal sandals, each attached to milled-steel springs of high tensile strength and compressed in a tightly coiled position by a cocking device with a lanyard release. Mr. Coyote believed that this product would enable him to pounce upon his prey in the initial moments of the chase, when swift reflexes are at a premium.

To increase the shoes’ thrusting power still further, Mr. Coyote affixed them by their bottoms to the side of a large boulder. Adjacent to the boulder was a path which Mr. Coyote’s prey was known to frequent. Mr. Coyote put his hind feet in the wood-and-metal sandals and crouched in readiness, his right forepaw holding firmly to the lanyard release. Within a short time Mr. Coyote’s prey did indeed appear on the path coming toward him. Unsuspecting, the prey stopped near Mr. Coyote, well within range of the springs at full extension. Mr. Coyote gauged the distance with care and proceeded to pull the lanyard release.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com