数十年来致力于同一理念的人们
People that worked on the same idea for decades

原始链接: https://nityasnotes.com/writing/decades/

伟大的作品很少源于一时的顿悟,它们往往是数十年反复打磨的结晶。 计算机科学家斯蒂芬·罗伯逊(Stephen Robertson)花费了近二十年的时间来完善搜索算法。从1976年开始,他通过强调词项区分度来挑战当时主流的检索理论,并在一篇篇论文中不断迭代,最终在1994年发布了经典的BM25算法。通过整合词频和文档长度等要素,他将早期的概率基础转化为了行业标准。 同样,艺术家葛饰北斋也是在经过四十年的专注磨砺后,才创作出了他的代表作《神奈川冲浪里》。他在73岁时曾感叹,自己对自然的终身研究仍在演进,并将自己的艺术生涯视为一场通往“神圣境界”的无止境攀登。 这些例子揭示了一个共同的模式:无论是技术还是艺术,精通都是一个缓慢且积累的过程。真正的突破并非来自突如其来的灵感,而是源于一生中不断重温、精炼并深化核心理念的耐心。

抱歉。
相关文章

原文

I collect examples of people that worked on iterations of the same idea over the course of decades, before landing on their magnum opus

1. BM25 + Stephen Robertson

Stephen Robertson is a computer scientist known for his work on probabilistic information retrieval, most famously leading to BM25. In 1976, when researchers wanted to determine the relevancy of a document to a query, prevailing intuition was that a document that has a greater count of query term is more relevant. Robertson and Sparck Jones showed that relevance of a document to a query is more dependent on if the word is discriminating and uniquely present in relevant documents.

Let's say there are 10 documents of which 4 are relevant to a query about elite marathoners like Kipchoge. All 10 documents contain the word "the". Only the 4 relevant documents contain the word "Kipchoge". Per their 1976 paper, the term Kipchoge would have a heavier weight than "the" because it is discriminatorily present in the relevant documents.

Calculating term weight required knowing which documents were relevant in advance and did not consider term frequency or length of documents.

Eventually in 1994, Robertson and Walker published BM25, which is IDF * term frequency adjusted for length. It takes the concept of term weights in 1976 and incorporates the assumption that relevant documents are a fraction of a total set.

BM25 paper excerpt

I skipped a few chapters, there was a 1981 paper where he incorporated term frequency for example. All in all, he spent decades thinking about search algorithms and retrieval.

2. The Great Wave by Kanagawa

Few paintings have lasted the test of time as the great wave of Kanagawa. It took Kanagawa 40 years before he drew the wave he is most known for. At 73, he said he finally understands "the underlying structure of birds and animals, insects and fish, and the way trees and plants grow. Thus if I keep up my efforts, I will have even a better understanding when I was 80 and by 90 will have penetrated to the heart of things. At 100, I may reach a level of divine understanding, and if I live decades beyond that, everything I paint — dot and line — will be alive."

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com