“越改越糟”:你的软件更新所需要的词汇
Verschlimmbesserung: The Word Your Software Updates Need

原始链接: https://geekyschmidt.com/post/2026-08-25-verschlimmbesserung/

德语词汇“Verschlimmbesserung”(越改越糟)完美诠释了那种令人沮丧的软件更新:它们以“改进”之名优先考虑变更,却往往破坏了工作流程。 这种现象源于激励机制的错位。当组织将频繁发布或随意设定的指标置于真正的用户价值之上时,工程团队难免会为了这些关键绩效指标(KPI)而进行优化——即便结果导致产品变差。正如埃利亚胡·高德拉特所言,人们的行为完全取决于他们的考核方式。如果目标是发布速度,团队就会不顾实际影响而盲目发布。 卓越的产品需要承认:稳定性是一种功能,而非缺陷。有时,最理性的工程决策是选择“不发布”。为了避免陷入为了改变而改变的陷阱,领导层必须重新思考激励机制。如果我们只衡量产出,就只会得到无意义的更新;如果我们衡量的是实际价值,或许才能真正将用户体验置于发布周期之上。

抱歉。
相关文章

原文

The German language has a word for what your last software update did.

It is called Verschlimmbesserung: an attempted improvement that only makes things worse.

We have all lived through the SaaS update that moved a button, renamed a menu, and broke a workflow we relied on daily. Some product team shipped a “better experience” that solved a problem nobody had.

Eliyahu Goldratt nailed the root cause decades ago:

“Tell me how you measure me, and I will tell you how I will behave. If you measure me in an illogical way… do not complain about illogical behaviour…”

When point releases become more important than the product itself, you are incentivising Verschlimmbesserung. Your engineering teams are not failing. They are optimising for the metrics you gave them.

How you measure and incentivise your teams tells them exactly what you value. If the metric rewards churn, you get churn. If the metric rewards shipping, you get shipping; whether it improves anything or not.

Is new always better? Probably not. Office 2003 is still incredibly useful because nobody forced it to constantly reinvent itself.

Stability is a feature. Knowing when not to ship is an engineering discipline.

The Germans built a word for it. Perhaps we should start using it.

Verschlimmbesserung
联系我们 contact @ memedata.com