法官裁定为新冠肺炎患者开具伊维菌素的医生胜诉
Judge Rules For Doctor Who Prescribed Ivermectin For COVID-19

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/judge-rules-doctor-who-prescribed-ivermectin-covid-19

一位联邦法官裁定,梅里尔·纳斯(Meryl Nass)医生针对缅因州医学执照委员会提起的诉讼可以继续进行,该诉讼主要针对委员会要求她接受心理评估这一极具争议的命令。 2022年,该委员会以纳斯医生散布有关新冠疫情的虚假信息及违规开具处方药为由,吊销了她的行医执照。尽管没有任何证据表明她患有精神疾病或存在药物滥用问题,委员会仍强制要求她进行心理健康评估以恢复执照。美国地区法官兰斯·沃克(Lance Walker)对委员会的这一决定提出批评,称其“毫无根据且缺乏流程”,并指出该决定缺乏必要的保障措施,且委员会似乎有意利用这一命令来杀鸡儆猴。 虽然沃克法官以委员会成员享有豁免权为由,驳回了关于吊销执照决定的诉讼请求,但他允许针对心理评估的法律挑战继续推进。目前已移居新罕布什尔州的纳斯医生坚持认为,委员会设定的条件过于苛刻,旨在压制她提供偏离政府建议的医疗服务的能力。她的执照目前仍处于吊销状态。

相关文章

原文

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times,

A doctor's lawsuit against Maine's medical board can proceed, a federal judge has ruled.

An order from the Maine Board of Licensure in Medicine that Dr. Meryl Nass undergo a psychological evaluation for allegedly spreading misinformation about COVID-19 was "based on no evidence or process," including no probable cause, U.S. District Judge Lance Walker said in an Aug. 20 decision.

"In judicial proceedings, at a minimum probable cause findings ordinarily are required to justify pretrial impositions. In this case, as alleged, the Board dispensed with preliminary proceedings altogether," Walker wrote.

The process appeared to have "lacked any safeguards to protect against agency zeal and resembled investigatory action imposed, somewhat ironically, in the absence of evidence rather than the initiation of an impartial, sober, thoughtful judicial process designed to assess the truth of facts to arrive at the existence of probable cause to justify such a sanction," he also said.

The board did not respond to a request for comment by publication time.

"I am happy to report that I will eagerly move forward with the legal case to clear my name and defend the free speech right of medical practitioners to tell the truth to their patients, especially if it goes against government or medical orthodoxy," Nass said in a blog post.

Maine's medical board in 2022 suspended Nass's license after receiving a complaint from a person who was not her patient that the doctor was spreading misinformation about COVID-19 because she noted that people who recovered from the illness had protection against re-infection.

Board members also took issue with how Nass prescribed ivermectin to a COVID-19 patient and lied to a pharmacist about why she prescribed hydroxychloroquine to another patient. It was for COVID-19, not for Lyme disease.

The board ordered Nass to undergo a psychological evaluation in order to get her license back, among other conditions. State law only authorizes such an order when a licensee "may be unable to practice medicine with reasonable skill and safety to patients by reason of mental illness, alcohol intemperance, excessive use of drugs, narcotics, or as a result of a mental or physical condition interfering with the competent practice of medicine," Walker noted in the new ruling.

"The record before the Board did not include any suggestion or information that Dr. Nass suffered from drug or alcohol abuse or a physical condition, suggesting that, if anything, the Board considered Dr. Nass's opinions to be the product of not independent thought but a mental illness or mental condition," he said. "Alternatively, the imposition of this sanction would suggest that the Board was making an example out of Dr. Nass."

The Maine Superior Court previously voided the psychological evaluation order, concluding it was arbitrary and capricious.

After that court ruled, Maine's medical board asked the federal court in Maine to throw out Nass's lawsuit.

Walker sided with the board regarding its actions apart from the evaluation, finding members enjoyed immunity for their conduct during the hearing on the allegations against Nass and for their determination to suspend her license.

But the case can move forward regarding the psychological evaluation order, he said.

"The scope of what remains of Dr. Nass's claims will need to be addressed in later proceedings but includes, at a minimum, the requirement that she submit to a psychological evaluation," the ruling stated.

Nass told The Epoch Times in an email that her license remains suspended because the board imposed conditions that would have prevented her from practicing independently, including requiring her to send her charts regularly to the board for review.

"The reason I wanted a license was so that if another pandemic happened, I would be able to provide the appropriate care to patients as I saw fit, which might not be what the government recommended," Nass said. "Since the conditions the Board imposed precluded that, I did not seek to regain the license, which remains suspended."

Nass also said she recently moved to New Hampshire.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com