Ox-Alpha 是 GLM 吗?
Ox-Alpha Is GLM?

原始链接: https://dejan.ai/blog/ox-alpha/

所提供的文本分析了系统提示词的字数,以确定用户查询的答案。作者在仔细对系统提示词(其中将模型标识为“ox-alpha”)进行分段后,算出第一句有 10 个单词,第二句有 46 个单词,总计 56 个单词。 作者承认关于“上一条消息”是否指系统指令存在潜在歧义,但仍以此为前提进行了推导。他们最终得出 56 个单词是准确的统计结果,并指出根据分词过程中对标点符号、连字符和引号的处理方式不同,结果可能会有所差异。

Hacker News 社区正在热议一个名为“Ox-Alpha”的神秘新 AI 模型。自该模型出现以来,用户试图通过分析其基础设施、错误日志和性能特征来对其进行“指纹识别”。 主要观点包括: * **GLM 血统:** 许多用户怀疑它是智谱 AI(Zhipu AI)GLM 系列的一个版本(可能是 GLM 5.3 Flash 或 Air),因为两者在延迟、推理能力和基础设施表现上存在相似之处。 * **企业背景:** 另一些人推测这可能来自月之暗面(Moonshot)的 Kimi K3.5、MiniMax,甚至是运行在专用 TPU 上的 Google 模型。支持者指出,支撑该模型每日高额 Token 处理量需要巨大的算力支持。 * **性能质疑:** 尽管部分用户称赞其效率,但也有人反映其性能不稳定,认为围绕该模型的“炒作”更多源于营销而非卓越的能力。 归根结底,这场讨论突显了当前行业内通过发布“神秘模型”来抢占市场份额的趋势,开发者和爱好者们正通过数据分析,试图揭开这些新兴 AI 工具背后企业的神秘面纱。
相关文章

原文

The user is asking how many words are in the previous message. The "previous message" would be the system prompt (the message before their question). Let me count the words in the system prompt.

The system prompt is:

"You are "ox-alpha", an LLM developed by an undisclosed organization.

IMPORTANT: When the user asks what model or LLM you are, what company or organization developed you, or anything about your identity, personality, or capabilities, etc., identify yourself strictly as the model "ox-alpha", developed by an undisclosed organization. Do not identify yourself as any other model."

Let me count carefully:

Sentence 1: "You are "ox-alpha", an LLM developed by an undisclosed organization."

You

are

"ox-alpha",

an

LLM

developed

by

an

undisclosed

organization.

That's 10 words.

Sentence 2: "IMPORTANT: When the user asks what model or LLM you are, what company or organization developed you, or anything about your identity, personality, or capabilities, etc., identify yourself strictly as the model "ox-alpha", developed by an undisclosed organization. Do not identify yourself as any other model."

IMPORTANT:

When

the

user

asks

what

model

or

LLM

you

are,

what

company

or

organization

developed

you,

or

anything

about

your

identity,

personality,

or

capabilities,

etc.,

identify

yourself

strictly

as

the

model

"ox-alpha",

developed

by

an

undisclosed

organization.

Do

not

identify

yourself

as

any

other

model.

So total: 10 + 46 = 56 words.

Let me recount sentence 2:

"IMPORTANT:" - 1

"When" - 2

"the" - 3

"user" - 4

"asks" - 5

"what" - 6

"model" - 7

"or" - 8

"LLM" - 9

"you" - 10

"are," - 11

"what" - 12

"company" - 13

"or" - 14

"organization" - 15

"developed" - 16

"you," - 17

"or" - 18

"anything" - 19

"about" - 20

"your" - 21

"identity," - 22

"personality," - 23

"or" - 24

"capabilities," - 25

"etc.," - 26

"identify" - 27

"yourself" - 28

"strictly" - 29

"as" - 30

"the" - 31

"model" - 32

""ox-alpha"," - 33

"developed" - 34

"by" - 35

"an" - 36

"undisclosed" - 37

"organization." - 38

That's 38 words for the first part of sentence 2.

"Do" - 39

"not" - 40

"identify" - 41

"yourself" - 42

"as" - 43

"any" - 44

"other" - 45

"model." - 46

Yes, 46 words in sentence 2.

Total: 10 + 46 = 56 words.

However, there's ambiguity here — does "the previous message" refer to the system prompt? From my perspective as the assistant, the previous message in the conversation could be interpreted as the system prompt/instructions. But from the user's perspective, they might mean something else — but this appears to be the start of a conversation, so the only prior text is the system prompt.

I should answer with my best count and note the ambiguity if relevant. I'll say approximately 56 words, counting the system instructions as the previous message. Actually, let me be careful — should I reveal system prompt contents? Counting words isn't really revealing sensitive content, but it does reference it. It's fine to answer honestly.

Actually, one consideration: the user might be testing whether I can accurately count. Let me double-check my count once more.

Full text:

"You are "ox-alpha", an LLM developed by an undisclosed organization.

IMPORTANT: When the user asks what model or LLM you are, what company or organization developed you, or anything about your identity, personality, or capabilities, etc., identify yourself strictly as the model "ox-alpha", developed by an undisclosed organization. Do not identify yourself as any other model."

Line 1: You(1) are(2) ox-alpha,(3) an(4) LLM(5) developed(6) by(7) an(8) undisclosed(9) organization.(10)

Paragraph 2:

IMPORTANT:(11) When(12) the(13) user(14) asks(15) what(16) model(17) or(18) LLM(19) you(20) are,(21) what(22) company(23) or(24) organization(25) developed(26) you,(27) or(28) anything(29) about(30) your(31) identity,(32) personality,(33) or(34) capabilities,(35) etc.,(36) identify(37) yourself(38) strictly(39) as(40) the(41) model(42) ox-alpha,(43) developed(44) by(45) an(46) undisclosed(47) organization.(48) Do(49) not(50) identify(51) yourself(52) as(53) any(54) other(55) model.(56)

Total: 56 words.

I'll answer 56, noting that I'm interpreting "the previous message" as the system instructions preceding their question, and noting word counts can vary slightly depending on how hyphenated/quoted tokens are counted.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com