我们能在不使用化石燃料的情况下疏浚荷兰吗?
Could we dredge the Netherlands without fossil fuels? (2018)

原始链接: https://solar.lowtechmagazine.com/2018/08/could-we-dredge-the-netherlands-without-fossil-fuels

长期以来,荷兰一直依赖大规模的疏浚工程来维护其重要的水道基础设施,而这项任务目前正消耗着大量的化石燃料。然而从历史上看,荷兰人曾通过智慧和体力劳动来应对不断的泥沙淤积。 在现代吸泥船(每分钟可清除100立方米淤泥)出现之前,疏浚工作是由成千上万的劳工使用手持式“疏浚袋”完成的。随着需求增长,技术不断演进,出现了利用链斗挖掘深水区的人力及畜力“疏浚磨”。荷兰人还利用自然力量,使用“刮泥器”(通过水流、风力或马匹牵引的耙子)来松动沉积物。在弗里斯兰等地区,设计者选择进行结构适应,建造了被称为 *skûtsjes* 的浅吃水船,以尽量减少对加深运河的需求。 随着疏浚行业面临燃料密集型维护所带来的环境挑战,这些前工业时代的方法提供了一个引人深思的历史视角。“人力发电厂”项目甚至探讨了回归人工方法的可能性,并提出了一个问题:现代社会能否在不完全依赖化石燃料机械的情况下,可持续地维护重要基础设施。

所提供的文本摘录了一场关于无化石燃料疏浚可行性的 Hacker News 讨论,该讨论由《低技术杂志》(Low Tech Magazine)2018 年的一篇文章引发。 对话聚焦于更换高功率柴油疏浚设备所面临的技术挑战。参与者提出了多种替代方案,包括通过连接电网的电缆为挖泥船供电(将其比作电力铁路系统),或在电池无法满足需求的情况下,针对高能量密度要求使用合成液体燃料。 讨论扩展到关于可持续性领域“低技术”与“高技术”路径之间更广泛的意识形态分歧。批评者认为,环保主义者往往依赖于忽视现代工程现实的“低技术”方案。相反,其他人则强调了能源投资回报率(EROI)的重要性以及生物燃料的局限性;他们指出,虽然大多数行业已存在可持续的替代方案,但像大规模疏浚这类“难以减排”的行业,需要务实地转向电气化基础设施或先进的高密度储能技术。这场辩论突显了在环境管理愿望与维持关键、高能耗海事基础设施且不依赖化石燃料的后勤复杂性之间存在的张力。
相关文章

原文
1699 scale model of a scratcher rigged with sails. Image: Maritiem Digitaal
1699 scale model of a scratcher rigged with sails. Image: Maritiem Digitaal

View original image View dithered image

The dredging industry has been the backbone of the Dutch economy for centuries. If canals, harbours and rivers would not be maintained for a few years, the whole country would literally grind to a halt.

Today, dredging happens with oil powered ships, which burn up to 3,000 litres of fuel per hour. However, in earlier times, the Dutch waterways were dredged mostly by hand, using simple but ingenious tools.

Manual dredging was heavy labour, especially when waterways became deeper. Therefore, it was supplemented by animal power, wind power and tidal power. However, in some parts of the Netherlands, people chose a different strategy: they designed a new type of cargo ship that could sail in shallow waterways.

35 million m³ of mud

Siltation is a serious problem in the Netherlands, which lies in the delta area of various rivers that supply large amounts of silt and clay particles. At the same time, navigable waterways are essential to maintain transportation and trade — the country is home to the largest port in Europe, Rotterdam.

Each year, some 30 to 35 million m³ of mud are dredged out for the maintenance of the Dutch waterways. Approximately 75% comes from salty waters. In the port of Rotterdam alone, 20 million m³ of mud is collected each year.

The demand for dredging continues to increase. Both inland ships and seagoing vessels continue to get bigger, requiring ever deeper and wider waterways. A “modal shift” policy, in which cargo transport moves from the road to the water in order to improve sustainability and reduce congestion, also leads to more and larger ships, and thus to more dredging.

Dredging by hand in Delft, the Netherlands. Image: Maritiem Digitaal.
Dredging by hand in Delft, the Netherlands. Image: Maritiem Digitaal.

View original image View dithered image

Although most of the mud is dumped into the sea, each year 3.5 to 5 million m³ of contaminated sediments must be landfilled. Then there is the dependency on fossil fuels. A typical suction hopper dredger has a pumping power of 2,500 kW and removes 100 m³ of sediments per minute. The largest dredgers have 30,000 kW engines and 6,000 kW of pumping power. At full power, these ships consume 3,000 litres of oil per hour.

Dredging a Country by Hand

Silting is a very old problem in the Netherlands, so how did this job happen before the arrival of fossil fuel powered dredging machines and boats?

For centuries, the Netherlands were mainly dredged by hand. Dredgers stood on a small boat and scraped mud from the bottom with their “dredge bag” (“baggerbeugel”). In an alternative configuration, the dredger stood on a wooden board that was supported by the river bank on one side, and by a floating container on the other side.

Dredging by hand, standing on a boat. Image.
Dredging by hand, standing on a boat. Image.

View original image View dithered image

Handling a dredge bag.
Handling a dredge bag.

View original image View dithered image

The dredge bag, a tool that was also used for peat cutting, was a long stick (up to 6 metres long) with an annular metal scraper and a net at the end. There were different types of nets and bags, depending on the composition of the sediment. Working with the dredge bag, the handle was rested against the shoulder, so that the net could be dragged over the bottom with two hands.

For large dredging works, thousands of workers with dredging bags were deployed.

The mud was pulled ashore or deposited in a flat barge. For large dredging works, such as the construction of the Northern Holland Canal in 1822-1825, thousands of workers with dredging bags were deployed. Until about 1960, contractors of dredging works employed men with dredging bags for the maintenance of shallow ditches and canals. The tool is still for sale.

Dredge Mills

Manual dredging is heavy and time-consuming work, so people designed technology that could ease and speed up the task. Furthermore, ships became ever larger. In the last quarter of the sixteenth century, the “dredge mill” was introduced, which worked up to a depth of two metres. It was still based on human power, but now people were merely the power source for a machine.

On a dredge mill, a group of people worked large treadmills or capstans, which drove a paddle wheel that scooped the mud from the bottom and threw it into a barge that was moored across. The dredge mill was usually made up of two flat barges with the rotating wheel in between. These machines were often operated by prisoners.

However, one century later, the depth of a merchant ship had increased to between 3.5 and 5 metres — and this was too deep for the human powered dredge mill. In 1622, the first horse-powered dredge mill was built. Three to six horses ran a pivot which set in motion a bucket chain. The horses had to be changed every hour because of the heavy labour involved.

In 1829, horse powered dredge mills could be used to dredge up to a depth of 5-7 metres. If working at a depth of 3.2 metres, with three to six horses, approximately 20 m³ of mud could be collected each hour. By comparison, the average modern suction dredger — which removes 100 m³ of mud per minute — is as powerful as 300 horse powered dredge mills.

Mechanical dredge bags on a pontoon. Image.
Mechanical dredge bags on a pontoon. Image.

View original image View dithered image

The original dredging techniques were also improved. Mechanical dredge bags emerged in the sixteenth century, when someone got the idea to pull the dredging bag with a rope over a winch. Mechanical dredge bags could be mounted on ships, but several dredge bags and winches could also work side by side on a pontoon.

During the first half of the nineteenth century the valve barge was invented. The bottom of this small boat could be opened without causing it to sink. In this way, it took less time to remove the mud. The technique is still used in some modern dredgers.

Valve barge with dredge bag. Image: Maritiem Digitaal.
Valve barge with dredge bag. Image: Maritiem Digitaal.

View original image View dithered image

Scratchers

The Dutch also took advantage of renewable energy sources to lighten the work — in particular wind and tidal power. From the fifteenth century onwards, the “scratcher” (“krabbelaar”) was used, a scraper that could dredge gullies if there was enough current.

With a strong current, dredging becomes easier, because the mud only needs to be loosened. The tide ensures the discharge of the material to the sea.

Human powered scratcher. Source: Maritiem Digitaal.
Human powered scratcher. Source: Maritiem Digitaal.

View original image View dithered image

Human powered scratcher. Source unknown.
Human powered scratcher. Source unknown.

View original image View dithered image

Simple scratchers were a kind of large rakes that were dragged across the bed of the water body. These were pulled by horses or people — some were pulled by a rowing boat.

Wind Powered Dredgers

In harbours with strong winds and tides, scratchers were rigged with sails. These triangular sailing ships had a broad stern and a flat bottom. Attached to the bottom was a harrow with iron spikes. At mid tide, the scratcher was placed just before the lock gates of a scouring basin, which was filled during high tide.

At low tide, the sluice gates of the basin were opened and the scratcher was pushed through the harbour with great force as the iron teeth scraped across the bottom. The ship gathered extra speed through the wide stern and, if the wind was good, the use of sails. Horses could also be used, pulling the ship in the absence of good winds.

At low tide, the sluice gates of the basin were opened and the scratcher was pushed through the harbour with great force as the iron teeth scraped across the bottom.

Wind powered scratchers were in use at least since 1435 in the southeastern part of the Netherlands. The flat bottom of the scratcher hinged and could sink with the help of cables to improve the draft. Two revolving doors, which could make a sharp angle of about 45 degrees with the ship, increased the reach of the barge.

Backside of a wind powered scratcher.
Backside of a wind powered scratcher.

View original image View dithered image

Nevertheless, manpower was still needed. Five to six men kept the monster in the right lane, while two to three men kept the harrow at the desired depth through pulleys and hoist blocks.

Alternatives to Dredging

Dredging was not the only answer to the siltation of waterways. Until the nineteenth century, the choice was also made to increase the height of river banks and dikes, so that the water level was allowed to rise. This was especially true for large rivers.

In a report from 1825, the dredging of large rivers was not considered a possibility because they were too deep and too wide for the technology of those days. It was only with steam power that dredging was also done on major rivers.

A Frisian Skûtsje. Image: Skûtsje Langwar
A Frisian Skûtsje. Image: Skûtsje Langwar

View original image View dithered image

The province of Friesland, in the north of the country, reveals yet another alternative to dredging. The Frisians never used dredge mills, horse mills or other tools than dredge bags. They continued to dredge by hand until the arrival of the steam engine.

However, they innovated in a different way: from 1889 to 1933, they built 1,200 large cargo ships with a very limited draft — the so-called “skûtjes”. Obviously, boats with a smaller draft meant less dredging. The strategy reminds of the medieval Chinese wheelbarrow, which allowed transportation to keep functioning at a time when the road infrastructure was crumbling.

How many people do we need?

In a more sustainable future, could we dredge the Netherlands without fossil fuels? Sustainability is all about cars and smart appliances, but what about large infrastructure and maintenance works? Powering today’s dredgers with solar or wind power sounds unrealistic: those ships would require enormous chemical batteries, which is not practical or sustainable.

Therefore, as part of the Human Power Plant, we investigated how many people would be needed if we were to dredge the Netherlands by hand again. To answer this question, we organised a workshop in which we dredged a piece of Frisian waterway by hand and measured how long it takes to collect 1 m³ of mud. The results are discussed in the video below.

For English substitles, click CC:

Sources:

Interviews and documentation Nationaal Baggermuseum, Sliedrecht, Rotterdam.

Canon van de geschiedenis van Smallingerland, Smelne’s Erfskip 2010; Drachtstervaart, Smelne’s Erfskip 2015, ISBN 978-94-90543-08-02.

Geschiedenis van de Techniek in Nederland. De wording van een moderne samenleving (1800-1890). H.W. Lintsen, 1992.

Rosmolens en krabbelaars: baggeren in pre-industriële tijd

Maritiem Digitaal.

Groot onderhoudsplan Baggeren 2015 tot 2020. Hoogheemraadschap de Stichtse Rijnlanden.

Uitvoeringsplan 2010 Meerjarenbaggerprogramma Waterschap Rivierenland

Scheepsmodel Krabbelaar, Katie Heyning, Zeeuwse Ankers, juli 2015.

Evaluatie van het Friese Merenproject, 2000-2010, Provincie Fryslân.

Baggeruitvoeringsplan 2007-2015. Wetterskip Fryslân

Baggerproblematiek in Nederland, Compendium voor de leefomgeving.

Meerjarenbaggerplan 2012-2018, Waterschap Hollandse Delta.

Baggerschepen: van baggermolen tot sleephopperzuiger Maritiem Nederland.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com