Flock Safety, the startup that blanketed America in automated license plate readers (ALPRs), announced Thursday that it is dialing back its expansive platform. The company is significantly shortening its data retention windows, requiring police to justify every search, and allowing cities to block neighboring jurisdictions from querying their cameras for immigration enforcement.
Not even (paid?) damage control by Bari Weiss' The Free Press could salvage the situation.
And with the 'Get the Flock Out' movement in full swing, more than 50 agencies and municipalities have canceled, suspended, rejected, or simply unplugged their Flock contracts since January, according to a tracker maintained by DeFlock. In July, Republican members of Congress filed at least two bills aimed at severely restricting the systems.
Others haven't waited for legislation. A Guardian investigation documented 33 destruction incidents across 23 states - cameras smashed, sawed off their poles, or hauled away entirely. One activist told AFP he has personally disabled roughly 30 devices and posts instructional videos to some 500,000 Instagram followers, while the DeFlock America Facebook group has grown past 600,000 members crowdsourcing camera locations and disabling techniques. In Oregon, six poles were cut down and a note left at the base: "Hahaha get wrecked ya surveilling fucks."
Fusion centers are now monitoring the surveillance state's opponents. Intelligence bulletins obtained by 404 Media through public records requests show law enforcement tracking anti-Flock TikTok and Instagram accounts, flagging "extensive and ongoing chatter on social media" about methods to "physically destroy Flock LPR cameras," and instructing departments to increase patrols around camera sites.
New Policies
Flock operates roughly 120,000 cameras nationwide, recording the plate numbers, makes, models, and bumper stickers of practically every car that passes. Thousands of law enforcement agencies across 49 states can search that data and share it seamlessly across jurisdictional lines.
According to CEO Garrett Langley's announcement, the platform is undergoing several major structural shifts:
- Retention Drops to Seven Days: Default data retention is shrinking from 30 days to just seven. Longer holds will now require data to be explicitly tied to an active case number as evidence.
- Mandatory Case Numbers: Every search query must now be labeled with a criminal case number to proceed.
- Automated Audits: A tool that flags abnormal search behavior is now mandatory for all law enforcement customers. If tripped, the system automatically locks users out pending an internal review.
- Jurisdictional Firewalls: Cities can now restrict what outside agencies are allowed to search their cameras for. Langley noted, "City A could allow City B to search its cameras only for a stolen vehicle, missing person, or violent crime while blocking searches related to immigration enforcement."
So, cities can choose not to help ICE catch illegals.
That feature exists for a reason. 404 Media found Flock's lookup tool aided at least 4,000 immigration-related searches between Trump's inauguration and May 2025 - including queries run in states that had banned local law enforcement from cooperating with ICE.
The policy shift also comes on the heels of a glaring security failure. Langley disclosed that a glitch discovered in December 2025 left some of Flock's AI-powered pan-tilt-zoom (PTZ) cameras exposed to the public internet. "For a brief period of time, third parties were able to access live streams and footage from those cameras," Langley admitted, attributing the breach to a vendor's network configuration error before adding, "We are accountable."
Meanwhile, earlier this month a North Carolina police officer was arrested for allegedly using Flock's plate readers to track her boyfriend's ex-wife. So random cops abusing Flock systems has been another issue.
An issue at scale, it turns out. The Washington Post reported this month that it found nearly 50 instances of officers charged or accused of using the cameras for unauthorized purposes, many of them tracking current or former romantic partners or family members. Four Richmond County Sheriff's Office employees have been arrested and fired since June for personal searches. This week, six Savannah Police Department employees - including four officers - were fired for searching friends and family and letting an outside agency use the city's cameras. Savannah says it caught them using Flock's audit function - the one that only became mandatory on Thursday.
Bipartisan Backlash
The movement against Flock doesn't break down cleanly along party lines. Lawmakers from both sides of the aisle, civil liberties organizations like the ACLU, and ordinary residents at local town halls have converged on the company.
While ALPR technology isn't new, Flock's hyper-aggressive expansion and easy-to-use search interface made the surveillance uniquely visible. The backlash unites left-leaning advocates concerned about over-policing and civil rights with right-leaning advocates concerned about constitutional privacy and government overreach.
As one surveillance-law scholar told the Associated Press, the "growing community backlash" aimed specifically at Flock has captured a profound cultural shift: people don't want their daily movements tracked.