两个轮子、些许取舍与油价
Two wheels, a few tradeoffs, and gas prices

原始链接: https://blog.raed.dev/posts/motocycle/

在法国,汽车平均载客量仅为 1.08 人,驾驶五座车辆运载单人本质上是低效的。摩托车提供了一个令人信服的替代方案:它们的耗油量约为汽车的一半,使用的原材料更少,且占用更少的道路与停车空间。除了生态效益外,作者还发现骑行能培养更具主观意图的出行习惯,并需要驾驶者保持一定水平的参与度和专注力,而这正是配备了各类现代“放空”功能的汽车所不需要的。 然而,作者也承认摩托车存在显著的物理风险。由于缺乏保护性“铁壳”的安全性,骑行者必须优先考虑严格的训练、防御性意识以及全套防护装备。尽管摩托车的死亡率更高,但作者认为,这种权衡是合理的,因为摩托车具有更长的机械寿命、卓越的环境效率,以及骑行本身带来的纯粹乐趣——这提供了一种汽车无法复制的与环境感官交融的联结。归根结底,对于那些愿意接受并管理道路固有危险的人来说,摩托车被视为一种实用、可持续且极具回报的选择。

这篇 Hacker News 讨论凸显了摩托车通勤既令人向往又潜藏危险的矛盾特质。尽管用户们津津乐道于摩托车带来的便利、节省的开支以及在车流中穿梭的快感,但这些益处与道路上严重且足以改变人生的风险相比,依然显得沉重。 一位评论者分享了自己遭遇的两起毁灭性事故:一起是被酒驾司机肇事逃逸,另一起则导致了永久性残疾。这些经历如当头棒喝,提醒人们即使是经验丰富的骑手,也往往受制于自身无法控制的因素,如司机的疏忽或其他人的简单失误。 最终,参与讨论者们达成共识:虽然骑行摩托车能提供独特的自由感,但其受伤的统计概率极高。对许多人而言,长期的身体风险——尤其是对那些肩负家庭责任的人来说——已超过了骑行的快感,导致一些人开始转向电动滑板车等更安全的出行方式。
相关文章

原文

Most cars on French roads carry exactly one person. The average occupancy for commuting trips in France is 1.08 passengers per vehicle 0. 16 million people driving alone, twice a day, in machines built to seat five. I ride a Kawasaki that weighs 185kg. It carries one person too, but at least it’s honest about it.

Fuel, materials, space

My fuel consumption sits around 3L/100km (73.5 MPG) in mixed riding. A comparable compact car doing the same coastal routes between Antibes and Nice burns 6 to 8 liters. That’s roughly half the fuel, half the CO2, for the same commute. On highway stretches where the engine stays in a narrow RPM band, consumption drops further.

The material gap is just as wide. A motorcycle uses a fraction of the steel, plastic, rubber, and electronics of a car. Less battery, fewer components, less waste at end of life. When an occupancy rate of 1.08 means almost nobody is using the other four seats, those seats are just mass you’re accelerating and braking for no reason.

Road space matters in this part of France. In Nice or Cannes during summer tourist season, three motorcycles fit in one car parking spot. Motorcycles cause less wear on road surfaces too. I think about this every time I watch someone in an SUV do their third lap around Place Garibaldi looking for a spot.

Where the ecological argument actually holds

The per-trip emissions math is straightforward, so I won’t belabor it. The part that surprised me is how owning a motorcycle changed my habits around driving in general.

I plan routes more carefully now. I’m more aware of weather and road conditions. I don’t make lazy 2km drives to grab groceries because suiting up in full gear for a 2km errand feels absurd, so I walk. The motorcycle has made me more intentional about when I use a motor vehicle at all. I can’t prove this is true for all riders, but I’ve seen it in the ones I know.

Motorcycles are also mechanically simpler than modern cars, with fewer systems to fail and fewer electronics to become obsolete. My Kawasaki will remain serviceable for decades with basic maintenance. Meanwhile the infotainment screen in a 2024 car will stop getting updates by 2029.

Electric

Electric motorcycles are on the way too, though the range isn’t there for my riding patterns yet. A small battery pack charged from French nuclear grid electricity would eventually make the per-kilometer carbon math very hard to beat.

Unfortunately, I don’t have access to a charging station where I currently rent, but as soon as that changes, I’m looking into electric/hybrid.

The risk

Motorcycling is dangerous. I’m not going to bury this in a disclaimer at the bottom or soften it with statistics about how safe modern bikes have become.

You are exposed. There is no crumple zone, no airbag, no metal cage. A pothole that a car driver doesn’t notice can put you on the ground. A driver checking their phone who drifts into your lane has a fender bender with another car but a serious crash with you. Rain changes the grip equation entirely, and the Côte d’Azur has a specific problem: it rains so infrequently that when it does, the roads are coated in months of accumulated oil.

I wear full gear every ride, even in August when it’s 35°C and the leather feels punitive. Helmet, gloves, jacket with armor, reinforced pants, boots. I took the progressive French licensing route (A2 then A) which includes long hours of mandatory training on handling, emergency braking, and low-speed maneuvers. I ride defensively, assume every car hasn’t seen me, and I still have close calls a few times a year.

Motorcycling forces you to ride differently, you have to pay attention, anticipate and be reactive. I have never “zoned out” on a motorcycle, I can’t say the same for cars.

The fatality rate per kilometer traveled is higher on a motorcycle than in a car. The numbers vary by country and source, but the gap is real everywhere. You have to accept that and adjust your behavior, or you shouldn’t ride.

Why it works

Nobody buys a motorcycle for the CO2 numbers. They buy it because riding is practical and most importantly enjoyable in a way that driving stopped being sometime around the introduction of lane-keeping assist.

On a motorcycle, you’re in the environment instead of sealed off from it. Lavender above Grasse in June, a 5-degree temperature drop when the road cuts through a forest, leaning into corners with your whole body. After 45 minutes through the hills behind Antibes, I arrive somewhere more awake than when I left. I’ve never once felt that way stepping out of a car.

motorcycle

The best ecological choice is the one people will actually make consistently. For me, that’s a motorcycle. I accept the risk because the tradeoff is worth it. Your math might come out differently.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com