我不读人工智能创作的小说。
I won't read LLM authored fiction

原始链接: https://mccormick.cx/news/entries/why-i-won-t-read-llm-authored-fiction

作者认为,阅读虚构作品对于保持创造力至关重要,因为它是个人写作的催化剂。通过吸收另一位作者独特的“统计特征”——即特定的词汇选择和语言模式,读者的文笔会变得更加生动且富有层次感。 与往往遵循常规结构的非虚构作品不同,虚构文学具有深刻的个人色彩与创造性。作者指出,这就是为何人工智能生成的文学作品令人感到乏味:由于大型语言模型被设计为从“统计学常态”中采样,它们会将读者引向平庸的平均值,而非卓越。为了避免算法带来的同质化影响,作者得出结论:虚构文学若要具有意义,必须由人类创作,以确保文本保留那种激发读者个人声音所需的、独特的灵魂品质。

最近的一场 Hacker News 讨论凸显了人们对大语言模型(LLM)创作小说的抵触情绪日益高涨。许多参与者认为,艺术本质上是人与人之间情感交流的行为,而一旦得知作品是由机器生成的,就会剥夺他们所珍视的人类“灵魂”、创作意图和情感联结。 AI 生成内容的批评者强调,创作过程——包括所有的挣扎、灵感和生活阅历——与最终成果是密不可分的。对于这些读者来说,LLM 的输出就像“毫无营养的稀粥”,缺乏伟大文学作品所必需的潜台词和真实的视角。另一些人则表达了信任危机,他们指出,由于无法核实作品是否由人类创作,他们越来越倾向于完全避开新作品,转而阅读 2023 年之前的经典著作。 相反,一些评论者认为,作者身份在阅读体验的质量面前是次要的,并引用了“作者已死”的文学理论。另一些人则指出,许多商业“通俗”小说本身就已模式化,可能与 AI 作品无异,这表明 AI 最终可能成为构建世界观或互动娱乐的有用工具。归根结底,这场辩论反映出人们在“视艺术为以人为本的必然需求”与“优先考虑消费和娱乐”这两类群体之间,存在着日益加深的鸿沟。
相关文章

原文

Aug. 5, 2026

There have been periods of my life where I stopped reading. I don't mean that I stopped reading entirely - I still read articles and blogs and journals, but I could not find the time to read fiction novels.

Fiction makes you think and feel in a way that other writing doesn't. I've noticed that my own writing comes much easier and fresher when I'm reading fiction regularly. I think I've figured out why this is.

When you read something that's written by somebody else it has a certain statistical profile. They will choose certain words over a certain other words. This is well established fact and can even be used to a degree for fingerprinting who wrote a piece of text. Every writer at a given point in time has their own unique profile. When you absorb someone else's statistical profile like this, by reading their words, it nudges your own in a new and more interesting direction. Your words begin to sparkle slightly. Your statistical profile is no longer the stodgy old one you had before but it's now been given a shine and a luster by the fresh new shape of the words you're reading.

I think this effect is stronger for fiction than for technical writing or non-fiction because people write fiction in a different way. Non-fiction is more biased towards the normal. Put simply, fiction is written from the heart. It's creative. Maybe it's closer to your raw, "natural" statistical profile than other types of writing.

I've been trying to figure out why I don't want to read a novel where most of the words are written by an LLM, even if a human designed the novel at a high level. It feels gross. I think this is the reason. The statistical profile of LLM writing is close to the normal. That's literally how LLMs work. They sample from a distribution that captures a median way of writing. I simply don't want my mind pushed towards the statistically normal when I am reading fiction. That's the exact opposite of what I want from the experience.

For any piece of fiction that I read from the 2020s and beyond, I want to know "this text was written by a human being in their own words".

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com