我们每周收取 1 万美元来删除 AI 生成的代码。
We charge $10k a week to delete AI-generated code

原始链接: https://odra.dev/slopfix/

您的 AI 生成代码库是否正在变成一个“凭感觉编程”(vibecoded)的噩梦,以至于每次添加功能都会导致系统崩溃?你并不孤单。我们通过将臃肿的项目重构为整洁、可维护的系统,帮助团队摆脱代码重复和技术债务的恶性循环。 **我们的流程:** 1. **免费分析:** 我们会检查您的代码库,评估我们是否能提供帮助。 2. **固定价格重构:** 在一周内,我们的三位高级工程师将合并重复逻辑,用标准库替换“自造”框架,并重建不可持续的部分。 3. **安全第一:** 我们会记录您应用程序的功能以确保零回归,提供两周质保,并安装防护措施(代码规范检查、CI/CD、CLAUDE.md),以保持您未来代码库的整洁。 **基于绩效的定价:** 我们会预先设定明确的代码行数缩减目标。如果完全达到目标,您支付 10,000 美元;如果部分达到,则按比例扣除费用。我们不搞“代码高尔夫”(过度精简代码),我们优先考虑可读性和长期可维护性。 不要让 AI 代理决定您的架构。如果您的项目已经变得无法管理,请发送电子邮件至 **[email protected]** 开始免费分析。让我们让您的代码重新变得易于人类阅读。

A recent Hacker News discussion highlights the rise of "vibe coding"—using AI to rapidly build and ship software without deep technical oversight. While proponents argue this dramatically increases velocity and eliminates the tedium of manual coding, critics warn it creates "AI slop": unmaintainable, brittle codebases where technical debt accumulates faster than humans can track. This trend has birthed a new niche service: "Slopfix" (odra.dev). The service charges $10,000 for a one-week, senior-engineer-led "refactoring" of these AI-generated projects. The goal is not just to clean up code, but to establish architectural boundaries and test suites that allow the AI-assisted system to remain manageable moving forward. The community debate centers on the sustainability of this model. Skeptics argue that patching AI-generated mess with more AI-assisted refactoring is a "Sisyphusian" task, while others view it as a necessary evolution of software engineering, where developers increasingly act as "plumbers" or "system editors" rather than builders. Ultimately, the discussion reflects a broader shift: as coding becomes cheaper and more automated, the value of software engineering is pivoting toward architectural oversight, business logic alignment, and the ability to distinguish between high-quality systems and automated clutter.
相关文章

原文

Did that happen to you?

You have an AI-generated codebase that works, but adding a feature now takes days and breaks two other things? This happens to every vibecoded project past a certain size: the agent stops seeing the whole picture and starts duplicating code instead of finding it. We can help.

What we do?

We analyze your codebase for free. If we don't think we can help, we say so and you've lost nothing. If we can, you get a fixed price and a committed reduction target — something like "100,000 lines down to 35,000, same functionality."

Then we do one week of focused work. Before touching anything, we sit down with you and write out exactly what your app does, screen by screen, endpoint by endpoint. That checklist is our safety net and yours. Then we cut: the fourteen date formatters become one, the hand-rolled framework becomes a library, the duplicated logic collapses. Where the code is beyond saving, we distil what it does and rebuild that part clean.

You keep everything. The smaller codebase, the QA checklist, and a set of guardrails — a CLAUDE.md, lint rules, CI checks — that slow the slop down when you go back to building. Plus two weeks of warranty: if we broke something that worked before, we fix it free.

Yes, we use Claude Code too. On a very short leash. The difference is thirty years of combined experience about what maintainable code looks like, and the agent doesn't get a vote.

What it costs?

One week. Three senior engineers. $10,000. We commit to a reduction target up front, and you pay in proportion to how much of it we hit. Promised 50% and delivered only 20%? That's 40% of the target, so you pay $4,000. Hit the target or beat it, you pay full price.

Lines are counted by scc, non-blank and non-comment, and the contract bans code golf. We don't win by deleting your comments or compressing your code into something clever and unreadable.

We are not agents

Talk to us

We're real people and we'd rather talk than exchange forms. If the story above sounds like your last three months, get in touch: [email protected].

Bring your repo. The analysis is free either way.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com