扎克伯格面临的最大法律梦魇可能让 Meta 损失 1.4 万亿美元。
Mark Zuckerberg's biggest legal nightmare yet could cost Meta $1.4T

原始链接: https://www.the-independent.com/tech/mark-zuckerberg-meta-fine-trillion-b3010281.html

Meta Platforms 面临高达 1.4 万亿美元的潜在罚款——这一金额几乎相当于其整个公司的市值。此前,四个州提起诉讼,指控该公司蓄意将 Facebook 和 Instagram 设计成令年轻用户上瘾的平台。包括加利福尼亚州和科罗拉多州在内的这些州认为,Meta 在平台安全性方面误导了公众,并违反了消费者保护法。 Meta 驳回了上述指控,称所要求的罚款“缺乏证据支持”,在法律史上前所未有。该公司进一步辩称,社交媒体成瘾并非医学上认可的诊断结果。 一场关键的审判定于 8 月在加利福尼亚州奥克兰市举行。届时,美国地区法官伊冯·冈萨雷斯·罗杰斯(Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers)将审理这些指控,以及来自 29 个州的指控——即 Meta 在未经家长同意的情况下收集儿童数据,违反了联邦法律。此案是针对社交媒体巨头的一波更广泛法律审查的一部分;TikTok、YouTube 和 Snap 也面临数千起诉讼,均涉及其平台对青少年心理健康的影响。罗杰斯法官已裁定,案件中仍存在重大的事实争议,这意味着尽管 Meta 试图推迟诉讼程序,这些指控仍将继续推进。

近期 Hacker News 的一场讨论聚焦于有关 Meta 因其平台具有蓄意成瘾性而面临 1.4 万亿美元潜在法律诉讼的报道。 评论者普遍认为,社交媒体公司设计算法的目的就是为了实现用户参与度最大化,并将这种做法比作烟草行业。尽管许多人承认这些平台提供了社交功用,但参与者认为它们造成的心理伤害——尤其是对儿童的伤害——非常严重,甚至可能比吸烟或饮酒更具隐蔽性。 这场辩论凸显了一个日益增长的公众共识,即 Meta 的设计选择具有掠夺性,不过用户对法律解决方案表示怀疑。许多贡献者质疑为什么公司依然只是面临可控的罚款,而不是更严厉的刑事级别后果,并指出财务处罚未能阻止 Meta 的行为。此外,用户指出这是一个全行业的问题,涵盖了 TikTok 和 YouTube 等平台,这表明整个以参与度为导向的商业模式需要监管和文化接受度方面的根本性社会变革。
相关文章

原文

Meta Platforms could face an unprecedented $1.4 trillion in penalties after four states accused the tech giant of deliberately designing Facebook and Instagram to addict young users while misleading the public about the platforms' safety.

The eye-watering figure was disclosed by Meta itself in a recent court filing responding to attorneys general's proposed penalty calculations. The total is close to the company's roughly $1.5 trillion market value.

The disclosure comes ahead of a pivotal trial beginning in August in Oakland, California. California, Colorado, Kentucky and New Jersey allege Meta violated state consumer protection laws by creating addictive products for children and teens.

Meta denies the allegations, calling the proposed penalty "unsupported by the evidence” (Reuters)

Meta denies the allegations, calling the proposed penalty "unsupported by the evidence."

"A sanction of that size has no analog in the history of consumer protection enforcement," the company said in its court filing.

Although the states' filings remain under seal, hearings in June revealed they calculated the potential penalties by multiplying the number of alleged violations by fines allowed under state law. The alleged violations are based on the estimated number of children and teenagers affected.

The August trial before U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers will also consider claims brought by 29 states accusing Meta of violating the federal Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (Reuters)

The August trial before U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers will also consider claims brought by 29 states accusing Meta of violating the federal Children's Online Privacy Protection Act by collecting children's data without proper parental consent.

Meta has argued that "social media addiction" is not an established psychiatric diagnosis and therefore its statements denying its platforms are addictive could not have been false.

The company faces additional legal battles beyond the August trial. Fourteen more states are pursuing similar claims under their own laws, with a separate trial scheduled for February.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta accused Meta of putting profits ahead of children's safety and pledged to hold the company "fully accountable" for its alleged role in the youth mental health crisis (Getty)

Last month, Judge Rogers rejected Meta's request to delay the August proceedings, ruling there are unresolved factual disputes over whether its platforms are addictive, whether the company falsely denied designing them that way, and whether Meta intentionally targeted children.

Following that ruling, California Attorney General Rob Bonta accused Meta of putting profits ahead of children's safety and pledged to hold the company "fully accountable" for its alleged role in the youth mental health crisis.

Meta is one of several social media companies facing mounting legal pressure. Snap, Alphabet-owned YouTube and ByteDance-owned TikTok are also battling thousands of lawsuits alleging they intentionally designed their platforms to keep children and teenagers hooked, contributing to widespread mental health problems.

New Mexico became the first state to take such claims to trial, winning a $375 million jury verdict in March after jurors found the company had misled consumers. A judge is now considering whether to award additional damages and order changes to Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com