欧洲公司网站大多由美国服务商提供支持。
Europe's company websites are mostly served by US vendors

原始链接: https://ciphercue.com/blog/european-web-hosting-vendor-share-2026

一项针对 19,450 个欧洲企业网站的研究显示,总部位于美国的供应商在欧洲大部分地区的互联网基础设施层占据主导地位。 在研究涉及的七个国家中,美国供应商在其中五个国家的首选网站中占据多数或相对多数的份额,其中英国(67.5%)和荷兰(53.6%)的依赖度最高。德国和波兰是显著的例外,这两个国家凭借强大的本土主机托管产业保持了较高的市场份额。 在所有七个市场中,Cloudflare 是最大的单一基础设施供应商,其市场表现持续领先于所有本土互联网服务提供商(ISP)及国际竞争对手。 该研究明确指出,这属于供应商归属分析,而非 IP 地理位置研究。尽管 Cloudflare 使用本地边缘服务器,但该公司是一家美国注册企业。对于评估供应链集中度、第三国数据暴露风险以及运营主权的欧洲政策制定者和企业而言,这一区别至关重要。 作者指出,尽管出于规模和安全特性考虑,依赖美国供应商通常是理性的技术选择,但研究结果突显了“主权差距”。在深入关注云区域或次级处理程序等更复杂的底层架构之前,企业应先评估这种供应商层面的依赖关系。

最近的一场 Hacker News 讨论分析了一份报告,该报告指出欧洲在网络基础设施方面严重依赖美国供应商。用户们讨论了这种趋势究竟是欧洲科技行业的失败,还是仅仅因为 AWS、Stripe 和 Cloudflare 等美国产品在质量、可扩展性和生态系统上更胜一筹。 讨论中出现了三个反复出现的主题: * **实用性与主权:** 许多贡献者认为,企业将功能性和成本置于区域来源之上。尽管一些人承认对美国的依赖在数据隐私和地缘政治影响力方面存在风险,但他们指出,欧洲的替代方案通常缺乏美国同类产品那样的稳健性或功能集。 * **文化与结构壁垒:** 参与者指出欧洲缺乏“中间地带”的采用率。市场分裂为偏好自托管的硬核开源爱好者,以及默认使用美国 SaaS 的主流用户。这使得欧洲 B2B 初创公司除非能提供远超对手的产品,否则很难获得市场份额。 * **质疑:** 用户批评了原文的研究方法,许多人将其称为“AI 垃圾内容”。批评者认为,该报告关注的是表面指标(如面向公众的网站 CDN),而非更关键的深层问题,即敏感的公司内部数据实际上存储和处理在何处。
相关文章

原文

We looked at the primary website apex and www records for 19,450 European company entities and asked a narrow question: which infrastructure vendor is serving the company's main web presence?

Across seven European markets, US-headquartered vendors serve the majority of primary company websites in two of them (the United Kingdom at 67.5% and the Netherlands at 53.6%), and the plurality in three more (Italy, Spain, and France, each between 44% and 49%). Cloudflare is the single largest internet-facing infrastructure vendor in every one of the seven countries we sampled, ahead of every other US vendor, every European hosting company, and every domestic ISP.

This is not an IP-geolocation study. It is a vendor attribution study. For each apex domain, we resolved DNS A/AAAA records and mapped the answering IPs to their announcing autonomous system. For CDN and proxy providers such as Cloudflare, that identifies the internet-facing serving vendor, not necessarily the origin host.

Vendor share by country

Each bar shows the percentage of primary company websites in that country served by a US-headquartered infrastructure vendor. The remainder is the "Other / regional" bucket, which includes European hosting companies, domestic ISPs, in-house infrastructure, and international vendors not matched by our keyword rules.

0% 25% 50% 75% 100% UK 67.5% NL 53.6% IT 48.4% ES 44.6% FR 44.2% DE 31.0% PL 18.8% US-HQ vendors serve the majority of the country's websites US-HQ vendors are the largest cluster, but not a majority Domestic hosting is the largest cluster
Share of primary company websites served by US-headquartered infrastructure vendors, by market.

Germany and Poland are the exceptions. Both have a dense domestic hosting industry (Hetzner, IONOS, STRATO, Mittwald in Germany; Home.pl, NetArt, ATMAN, Beyond in Poland) that shows up clearly in the observations. Everywhere else, US-headquartered vendors are either the plurality (Italy, Spain, France) or the majority (the UK, the Netherlands).

One vendor, in every country

The single largest internet-facing infrastructure vendor in every one of the seven markets is Cloudflare. Not the largest of the US-headquartered vendors, the largest of all vendors, foreign and domestic.

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% UK 31.6% NL 36.8% IT 28.2% ES 23.1% FR 28.2% DE 17.9% PL 15.2%
Cloudflare share of primary company websites, by market. In every country, Cloudflare fronts more sites than any other vendor.

Amazon is the second-largest US vendor in most markets. Google, Microsoft, Fastly, Akamai, and Squarespace round out the classified set.

The full numbers

CountryEntitiesUS-HQ vendorsCloudflareAmazonOther US-HQOther / regional
United Kingdom918620 (67.5%)290115215298
Netherlands2,2411,201 (53.6%)8251502261,040
Italy2,3501,138 (48.4%)6632272481,212
Spain1,427637 (44.6%)329128180790
France2,5041,107 (44.2%)7061732281,397
Germany5,6791,763 (31.0%)1,0173903563,916
Poland4,331813 (18.8%)66069843,518

What this measures, and what it does not

This is a vendor question, not a geography question. It has to be, because the geography question is harder than it looks.

Every Cloudflare-served website in every country is served from a Cloudflare edge POP that is likely to be geographically close to the visitor. A French visitor to a French site behind Cloudflare is almost certainly served from a Cloudflare edge in France. That does not mean the site is French-hosted. It means the site is Cloudflare-fronted, and Cloudflare is a US company. The origin server behind the Cloudflare edge could be anywhere, including the customer's own datacentre or a European provider.

That distinction matters for policy and procurement. EU regulatory regimes increasingly focus on ICT supply chains, processor relationships, third-country exposure, operational resilience, switching, and concentration risk. Physical packet geography is only one part of that picture. The more basic question is: which vendor is the organisation relying on at the internet-facing layer?

What this study does not measure:

  • physical data-centre location
  • origin hosting provider behind a CDN or reverse proxy
  • EU sub-processor arrangements the customer has in place
  • regional data-plane isolation offered by the vendor
  • customer-specific product configuration and tenancy model
  • US-only versus EU-based administration and control-plane arrangements

What this does not say

We are not saying European companies should not use US-headquartered vendors. Cloudflare has DDoS mitigation and edge presence that European competitors have not matched at scale. There are reasonable technical reasons to end up where the market has ended up.

We are not saying this is the whole cybersecurity picture. The internet-facing layer is one variable. Email security, IAM, EDR, SIEM, DNS, and endpoint management are separate stacks and each carries its own vendor geography, which we will look at in follow-up pieces.

The practical point is not that every European company should leave US infrastructure tomorrow. The point is that sovereignty discussions often start too late in the stack. Before organisations debate cloud regions, subprocessors, or contractual controls, they should know which vendors already sit in front of their public web estate.

For European infrastructure vendors, this is the market map. For policymakers, it is the base rate. For buyers, it is the inventory problem.

Method note

  • Data source: CipherCue's hosting_attribution observations. For every apex domain, we resolve DNS A/AAAA records and look up the announcing autonomous system via iptoasn.com (Routeviews-derived BGP data). Vendor classification is by AS operator name, not by IP geolocation.
  • What "vendor attribution" identifies: the operator of the AS that answers the DNS query for the apex or www record. For CDN and proxy vendors such as Cloudflare, this identifies the internet-facing serving vendor, not necessarily the origin hosting provider.
  • Scope: 19,450 European company entities in the CipherCue directory across DE, PL, FR, IT, NL, ES, GB. Filtered to apex domain and www subdomain only. Records for arbitrary subdomains (SaaS endpoints, jobs boards, CDN-fronted static assets) are excluded because those measure SaaS geography, not the entity's own vendor choice.
  • Snapshot window: 2026-04-28 to 2026-06-29.
  • Deduplication: each entity is counted once per vendor. An entity served by Cloudflare on both an IPv4 and an IPv6 address counts as one Cloudflare observation for that entity.
  • Vendor classification: AS operator description matched by keyword (Cloudflare, Amazon, Google, Microsoft, Fastly, Akamai, Squarespace, Wix, Shopify). Everything else falls into the "Other / regional" bucket. This bucket should not be read as "European". It includes European hosting companies, domestic ISPs, in-house infrastructure, and international vendors not matched by the keyword rules.
  • "US-headquartered": the eight vendors named above are all incorporated in the United States. This is the vendor's country of incorporation, not the country of the IP that answers.
  • Entity country: the country field on the entity record, sourced from the company's registered address in the country registrar it was seeded from (Companies House for GB, KRS for PL, HRB for DE, and so on).
  • Not counted: entities with no successful apex resolution during the window; entities without a country field; anything below the apex or www level.
CipherCue tracks observed infrastructure across European company entities and lets you slice by country, vendor, and category. Request a demo.
联系我们 contact @ memedata.com