本博客使用英式英语撰写。
This blog is written in en-GB

原始链接: https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2026/07/this-blog-is-written-in-en-gb/

作者拒绝了那些要求通过剔除特定文化用语和指代来使其博客内容更具全球“包容性”的请求。通过明确将内容标记为英式英语,作者认为自己的写作反映了其身份、口音和文化背景。 作者主张,遇到诸如“fringe”(刘海)或“jumper”(毛衣)这类不熟悉的术语并非理解障碍,而是一个学习契机。以美国读者阅读《哈利·波特》为例,作者认为读者完全有能力通过上下文线索来理解异域概念。正如作者本人是通过接触而非简化才了解了“Twinkies”等美国文化标志一样,他们相信读者也完全能够应对英国区域性的俚语和指代。 归根结底,这篇文章旨在提醒人们,世界并非文化同质的。作者鼓励读者拥抱对陌生事物的不适感,而不是要求语言的同质化。如果误解了某个指代或俚语,他们的建议是:保持冷静;大脑具有适应性,在不同文化视角间穿梭是交流中正常且可控的一部分。

这篇 Hacker News 讨论帖探讨了一篇博文,内容是作者决定坚持使用**英式英语 (en-GB)** 写作风格。讨论的核心在于区域语言认同与全球数字空间中美式英语的“文化霸权”之间的矛盾。 主要议题包括: * **文化认同与包容性:** 许多评论者认为语言是文化认同的核心,不应期望作者为了迎合全球(通常以美国为中心)的受众而将其写作风格同质化。另一些人则反驳称,在专业或国际语境下,使用小众的区域性习语可能会产生排他性且效率低下。 * **“美式规范”:** 参与者讨论了美式英语如何成为科技、媒体和互联网平台的默认标准。当英国或其他国家的用户遇到不同的日期格式、拼写习惯或计量单位时,往往会产生冲突。 * **语言细微差别:** 讨论深入探讨了“英语”本身的复杂性,指出英语并没有单一的标准。评论者对比了英式和美式在“quite”、“moot”和“tabled”等词汇用法上的差异,以及英国国内多样的区域方言,并指出期望获得统一的“英语”体验是不符合历史事实的。
相关文章

原文

Someone left a comment on my blog recently asking if I'd mind making my language more inclusive. They didn't get some of the cultural references I'd used and suggested it would be easier if I used tropes which were more globally known.

Here's the thing. No.

All my blog posts start with a simple declaration:

 HTML<!doctype html>
<html lang=en-GB>

There's a reason for that. It is more than the language I speak; it is the culture I live in, the way that I think, and the accent I use.

When your AI bot reads this text aloud, it should do so with a British accent. That's how I speak. It is OK to hear a slightly unfamiliar accent. You'll be able to figure out what I'm saying. Your world won't collapse if I don't start each sentence with "Howdy, y'all!"

But what should you do if you come across a concept you don't understand?

When The Wicked Witch of the TERFs released the first Harry Potter book "Philosopher's Stone", it was published in the USA with a different title; "Sorcerer's Stone". There were also a dozen other language changes - which caused great consternation in the fandom.

What do you think happens if Skip or Madison come across a kid eating "a sherbet lemon" or a description of Hermione's "fringe" or discover Harry wearing a jumper? Will their little minds collapse under the knowledge that people far away use different words?

No. And neither will you.

It is OK if things are unfamiliar to you.

Up until my mid-twenties, I had never seen or eaten a Twinkie. They were a cultural lodestone in a hundred books and films, but not the sort of thing I could buy locally. So I used my context clues. They seemed like an unappealing foodstuff which, nevertheless, were inexplicably popular.

As a kid, I could recite all the lyrics to Vanilla Ice's Ice Ice Baby without getting half the references. The brain is malleable and can fit in new concepts with relative ease.

So if you see a reference to Count Duckula, or hear me exclaim "Accrington Stanley!", or even blush as I describe an utter wanker - please take it as a sign that the hegemony is not universal and some people exist in a cultural milieu different to your own.

And breathe. It'll be OK.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com